1 / 66

PFO as a risk factor for Decompression Sickness

PFO as a risk factor for Decompression Sickness. Dr Peter Germonpré, MD. SCUBA diving is BIG FUN. In Belgium, 35.000 divers are performing each 30-100 dives per year  1- 3.000.000 dives /yr Recreational SCUBA diving is BIG BUSINESS : Dive gear Dive schools Dive vacations.

Jims
Download Presentation

PFO as a risk factor for Decompression Sickness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PFO as a risk factor for Decompression Sickness Dr Peter Germonpré, MD

  2. SCUBA diving is BIG FUN • In Belgium, 35.000 divers are performing each 30-100 dives per year 1- 3.000.000 dives /yr • Recreational SCUBA diving is BIG BUSINESS : • Dive gear • Dive schools • Dive vacations

  3. SCUBA Diving has it’s risks • … like any sport ! • Risks associated with the underwater environment: • Drowning • Hypothermia • Animal life • Pressure-related disorders

  4. Decompression Algorhythms

  5. Saturation & desaturation of inert gas • Saturation = uptake (N2 = nitrogen) in tissues Desaturation = wash-out (N2) from tissues • Source = lungs = destinationVector = plasmaDestination = tissues = source • Dissolution Coefficients 

  6. Possible factorsinfluencing saturation (& desaturation) • Diffusion – related factors • Depth of dive ( alveolarN2 pressure ) • Descent to which depth ( pressure gradient for N2) • Residual N2 pressure in tissue (from previous dive) • Perfusion – related factors • Dive time (time at depth) • Ascent speed • Cardiac output, vasoconstriction, personal (age, sex, health, VO2 Max…)

  7. Risk factors for DCS • Depth – Time profile – Repetitive dives • Reverse dive profiles • Speed of ascent • Exercise during dive • Cold during deco stops • Personal habits : poor physical condition, smoking, age • Personal factors : fat content, dehydration, alcohol use, sex

  8. Decompression Sickness in Divers • 30-50 cases per year in Belgium (overall risk = 1/40.000 dives) • Dive profile errors : 40% • normal saturation - insufficient off-gassing • “Logical” causes of decompression failure : 20% • increased saturation - “normal” N2 off-gassing • increased or normal saturation - insufficient off-gassing • “Unexplained” : 40%

  9. Decompression Sickness : the cause

  10. Haldane’s work (1908) Pressure ratio of 2 / 1 = SafeStaged decompression = no DCS= no bubbles ?

  11. Decompression Algorhythms • Are humans animals ?

  12. Risk ofDCS Time Depth Comex data base (JP Imbert)

  13. DAN Europe: analysis of 202 cases of DCS 1989-1993 Depth > 30 msw Deco diving Error ascent / stops Repetitive dive Stress – Fatigue Multiday diving Material fault Altitude after dive

  14. Decompression Sickness : the cause

  15. Boyle’s Law • Growth of bubbles in tissue (Yount 1989) • Coalescence of bubbles 1 ATA 0.75 ATA 0.5 ATA 0.25 ATA

  16. The Decompression Sickness « Grey Zone »

  17. Mechanism of disease

  18. The Foramen Ovale • Fœtal circulation: • High MPAP • RAP > LAP • Fossa Ovalis • Valve-like structure

  19. The Foramen Ovale • Neonatal circulation: • Low MPAP • LAP > RAP • Fossa Ovalis • Valve-like structure • Closure in 5-10 days (in seal pups)

  20. Mechanism of disease

  21. PFO-related DCS & the Brain • Germonpré et al. 1998 (J Appl Phys)(c-TEE): • Significant association PFO – cerebral DCS • No association PFO – Spinal DCS • Louge et al. 2001(Crit Care Med)(c-TCD) : • Cerebral DCS: 83% TCD pos • Spinal DCS: 37.9% TCD pos • Torti et al.2004 (Undersea Hyperb Med) (c-TEE): • > cerebral / vestibular symptoms

  22. Patent Foramen Ovale • Anatomical variant rather than disease • Prevalence: • 5-8mm long, 2-3mm wide • Valve-likestructure

  23. Reversal of inter-atrial pressures Vik et al., 1994 : Increase of MPAP during «bubbling» phase (>25%)

  24. Reversal of inter-atrial pressures Balestra et al. 1998 (Undersea Hyperb Med)

  25. Transthoracic echocardiography

  26. Trans-oesophageal echo

  27. C-TEE

  28. Retrospective studies (1) • 1989: Moon et al. (Lancet) : c-TTE • PFO 37% in DCS divers • PFO 61% in neurologic DCS • PFO 10.7% in non-divers • 1989: Wilmshurst et al. (Lancet) : c-TTE • PFO 66% in early neurologic DCS • PFO 17% in late neurologic DCS (30 min) • PFO 24% in control divers

  29. Retrospective studies (2) • 1998: Germonpré et al. (J Appl Physiol) – c-TEE • 37 DCS divers (20 cerebral, 17 spinal) • 36 matched control divers (age, sex, BMI, smoking, physical fitness, diving experience) • semi-quantification of PFO (gr 0, 1, 2) • “undeserved DCS” • No diving technical errors • < 3 minor risk factors (fatigue, effort, alcohol, cold, dehydration,…)

  30. Standardised, optimised c-TEE technique • Based on intrathoracic pressure changes • Strict protocol and sequence c-TEE Balestra et al. Undersea Hyperb Med 1998; Germonpré et al. J Appl Physiol 1998

  31. Cerebral damage in divers • Adkisson et al. 1989 (Lancet) (SPECT): • Cerebral perfusion deficit after neurologic DCS & AGE • Knauth et al. 1997 (Lancet) (RNM)(87 divers): • Multifocal cerebral lesions • 7 lesions in 7 divers without PFO • 34 lesions in 4 divers with PFO grade 2 • Total (TCD) 25 divers PFO, 13 grade 2 • Auto-selection of divers : ?

  32. Nitrogen bubble embolisation may cause cerebral ischemic damage in divers ? • Diver S. - 39 years old - 17 years diving experience - 800+ dives • 1 confirmed episode of vestibular / cerebellar decompression sickness - timely treated & completely recovered • Anamnesis: > 10 episodes of abnormal drowsiness, fatigue - during approx. 1 hour, after dives

  33. Brain Damage through diving ? Reul et al., Fueredi et al., Knauth et al.WEAK POINTS : • Selection bias : DCS ? • Morphological (MR) analysis : Wirchow spaces ? • PFO detection method : other shunts ?

  34. Brain Damage through diving ? • Selection bias : DCS ? • 200 volunteer divers: • Age < 40 yrs • > 5 yrs diving, > 200 dives • No history of DCS • Random ¼ selection • Morphological (MR) analysis: Wirchow spaces ? • T1, T2, FLAIR sequences: diff diagnosis • PFO detection method : other shunts ? • Standardised c-TEE • Neuropsychometric testing: WAIS, MMS subtests for neurotoxic solvents

  35. Results • In experienced divers who never had DCS, no increased prevalence of WML is found as compared to a control population • In these divers, a high prevalence of PFO is found (65%) (Germonpré et al. EUBS Congress 2003)

  36. Time-related opening of PFO in divers • Initial PFO prevalence: • 14/33 PFO (42.5%) – 5 Gr.1 - 9 Gr.2 • Final PFO prevalence: • 17/33 PFO (51.5%) – 3 Gr.1 - 14 Gr.2 • PFO grades: • Gr.0  Gr.1 : 3 /19 divers • Gr.0  Gr.2 : 1 /19 divers • Gr.1  Gr.2 : 4 / 5 divers • Gr.1  Gr.0 : 1 / 5 divers (Germonpré et al. Am J Cardiol 2005)

  37. PFO : should every diver be screened ? • Causes of DCS • normal saturation - insufficient N2 off-gassing • increased saturation - “normal” off-gassing • increased saturation - insufficient off-gassing • normal saturation - “normal” off-gassing - clinical manifestation of “silent bubbles”

  38. Haldane’s work Pressure ratio of 2 / 1 = SafeStaged decompression = no DCS= no bubbles ?

  39. Cardiac echography after a 25m/25min. Dive

  40. Reversal of inter-atrial pressures

  41. Retrospective studies : risk quantification • Germonpré et al. 1998 (J Appl Physiol) – c-TEE : • Odds Ratio PFO – no PFO : 2.6 • Odds Ratio PFO Gr 2 : 3.2 • Bove et al. 1998 (Undersea Hyperb Med) - META : • Odds Ratio PFO : 2.5 • Incidence of DCS in study population :2.28 / 10.000 dives • DAN 1989-1995 : DCS risk of «european diver»: • 1 / 7.390all dives (> 30m…) • 1 / 35.105no decompression dives < 30m

  42. Vascular bubble disease • Vascular bubble formation dependent on • Nitrogen load • Rate of ascent • Gas nuclei (endothelial cell pockets) • Nitrogen off-loading capacity of circulatory and pulmonary system (lung = bubble filter) • Cavitation at turbulence areas (heart valves) • Unknown factors • VGE : Venous Gas Embolism

  43. Feeling cold during decostops • Leffler et al. Aviat Space Env Med 2001 : increased risk for DCS when divers are warm throughout the dive • Marroni et al. EUBS Meeting 2001 : increased and prolonged bubble production when skin temperature was cold in end-stage of dive

  44. Physical condition • Carturan – J Appl Physiol 1999High VO2max (= good fitness)  less post-dive bubbles • Wisloff et al. J Physiol 2004Exercise at 20 hrs before dive prevents bubbles in rats – nitrix oxide (NO) or Heat Shock Protein (HSP) involved ?

  45. Age • Aerospace medicine : age group of 40-45 yrs 3x more DCS than 20-25 yrs old

  46. Smoking • HSE Report 2003 : smoking by itself not significant for DCS; lung function alteration 2x higher OR • Wilmshurst 2001 : smokers more likely for DCS-AGE

  47. Detection Methods for PFODiTullio et al. 1993 - Kerut et al. 1997 • c-TEE • Transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) • Sensitivity 68% to 90% - Specificity 100% • Transthoracic Echocardiography (c-TTE) • Sensitivity 47% - Specificity 100% • Right Heart Catheterisation • Sensitivity 80% - Specificity 100% (Di Tullio et al: Stroke 1993 - Kerut et al.: Am J Cardiol 1997)

More Related