1 / 33

How We Decide Jonah Lehrer

How We Decide Jonah Lehrer. Important question: when to use rationality vs. intuition. Reason vs. emotion: false dichotomy decisions DEPEND on emotion case history: tumor in orbitofrontal cortex OFC connects “primitive brain” to conscious thought. Feelings guide our choices

Sophia
Download Presentation

How We Decide Jonah Lehrer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How We DecideJonah Lehrer

  2. Important question: when to use rationality vs. intuition

  3. Reason vs. emotion: false dichotomy decisions DEPEND on emotion case history: tumor in orbitofrontal cortex OFC connects “primitive brain” to conscious thought

  4. Feelings guide our choices • rational thoughts tend to come AFTER decision has been made • LeDoux: feelings = summary of unconscious info processing • consciousness a small part of what brain does

  5. metacognition: only in humans (??) • done by “newer” parts of brain; still have a lot of “bugs” • older parts of brain debugged much longer

  6. dopamine—pleasure centers; helps regulate all emotions & helps us decide • Shultz: “prediction neurons” • if expectation confirmed: increased firing rate of “dopamine neurons”

  7. if expectation disconfirmed: decreased firing rate of dopamine neurons = prediction error signal • also: if expectation disconfirmed--anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)—error-related negativity signal (“oh, shit” circuit) • unexpected result focuses attention • ACC remembers feedback and adjusts expectations

  8. Artificial Intelligence • Deep Blue—chess. rigid, can’t learn from experience • Tesauro—backgammon. learn from playing games (similar to tic-tac-toe matchbox computer) • program predicts moves and refines predictions over thousands of games

  9. Artificial Intelligence • similar programs used for high rise elevators, flight schedules • program finds optimal solution itself

  10. Iowa Gambling Task • two types of card decks • one high risk, one conservative • conservative has higher long-term payoff • 10 cards: GSR increase for risky deck • 50 cards: start choosing conservative deck more often • 80 cards: can explain deck preference

  11. Deliberate Practice • best for improving decisions • focus on mistakes, not successes • “self criticism is the secret to self improvement” • Dunning—”incompetence” & need to use external feedback • Dweck studies

  12. When do emotions mislead us? • gambling: anticipation of reward excites dopamine system (note Parkinson’s ex.) • unpredictable rewards—tend not to adapt • incorrect beliefs cause incorrect expecations & actions • e.g., hot hand in basketball • e.g., finding patterns that are not there (T maze ex.)

  13. emotions misleading us • e.g., stock chartists • Deal or No Deal—base decisions on how deal “feels” instead of rational analysis • can work, but can mislead when emotions too strong (e.g., overreact to previous bad choice)

  14. emotions misleading us • framing: loss aversion • credit cards—less emotional attachment than actual money • small vs. large expenditures: stronger emotional response to large, but numerous small ones add up to more

  15. emotions misleading us • adjustable loans • smaller payment NOW: midbrain emotion areas • larger payment LATER: prefrontal cortex for rational planning • decision based on which is more active brain area

  16. emotions misleading us • Evolutionary psych “mismatch hypothesis” • our emotions evolved to solve adaptive problems in our evolutionary past; they may not be well-suited to decisions we make in modern life (as described by Loewenstein)

  17. “Nudge” • Thaler: we should design choice programs to make good decisions more likely • e.g., his “save more tomorrow” program: ask employees to opt into savings plan that will start in a few months • opt-out vs. opt-in programs

  18. Self Control • ability to delay gratification—a consistent personality trait • depends on prefrontal cortex controlling emotion centers • experts better able to control emotions in emergency situations (“deliberate calm”)

  19. When to think less • skilled athletes do better with less conscious control; e.g., golf studies • (note: Van de Velde description not completely accurate!!) • poster study: justify choice leads to less happiness with chosen poster; why?

  20. When to think less • too much analysis—focus on variables that don’t matter • poster we are happy with should be based on emotion, not logic

  21. When to think less • wine tasting: if know brand or price, it affects our rating • should choose blind to get what we actually like best

  22. ways we are bad at math • serving sizes affect how much we eat & drink • how far would you drive to save $15? • Ariely study & Social Security nos.

  23. too much information • more info—diminishing returns, then negative returns • better to focus on few most important factors • adding low quality info hurts

  24. too much info • MRI and back pain study • 2/3 of asymptomatic people had MRI that looked like a problem • doctors aware of this study still wanted MRI for their patients

  25. Moral Decisions • are based on emotions • reasons (rationality) comes later • siblings example • personal vs. impersonal decisions: trolley examples • animal examples of fairness sensitivity

  26. games and fairness • ultimatum game • dictator game • most people make fair offer to a person

  27. brain and decisions • Bechara—brain areas compete for control • competition is mostly unconscious • Knutson & Loewenstein study—consumer choice • nucleus accumbens—dopamine pathways • insula—aversion • prefrontal cortex—rational analysis

  28. Knutson & Loewenstein study • could predict choice by which area most active

  29. what if deadlocked? • not always best to “force” a decision • better to tolerate uncertainty, gather more information (unless not to decide is to decide)

  30. existing beliefs • confirmation bias—avoid info that contradicts existing beliefs; seek confirming info • study: evaluate contradictions by Bush & Kerry

  31. existing beliefs • self delusion “feels good” because we enjoy feeling certain • another author: overconfidence is worst cognitive bias • professional pundits study—predictions worse than chance; most famous were worst predictors

  32. existing beliefs • ideologies can make people disregard contradictory info • “prisoners of their preconceptions” • real experts learn from dissonant data

  33. playing poker • rational approach—know odds, keep track of cards • emotion—a feel for when to bluff, when to fold, etc. • experience—know when to rely on math and when to go with feel • use conscious mind to learn, and intuition to make choices

More Related