1 / 14

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Additional Considerations

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Additional Considerations. Environmental Economics, Lecture 16. Outline. Limitations of Cost-Benefit Analysis Discount rates Option values Appropriate use of cost-benefit analysis. Limitations of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Equity & distributional considerations

Thomas
Download Presentation

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Additional Considerations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Additional Considerations Environmental Economics, Lecture 16

  2. Outline • Limitations of Cost-Benefit Analysis • Discount rates • Option values • Appropriate use of cost-benefit analysis

  3. Limitations of Cost-Benefit Analysis • Equity & distributional considerations • Focus on total costs & benefits, not marginal • Possible to manipulate cost-benefit analyses. • Sensitive to analysts assumptions on • Discount rate • Treatment of risk/uncertainty

  4. Distorting a cost-benefit analysis • The “jobs game” • Example: the British Olympic Association argues that a “benefit” of London Olympics is job creation (9000 full time jobs). • What are the people who will take these jobs doing now? • Direct wage costs are a cost, not a benefit. • Reallocation of currently productive labor is also an opportunity cost, not a benefit.

  5. Discount Rates • How should a cost-benefit analysis value future benefits. • Present value (example) • I offer you $105 next year • The risk-free interest rate is 5%. • $105 is just as good as getting $100 now and putting it in the bank. • Present value of $105 next year is $100. • See Tietenberg, pp 24-25.

  6. If present value, what is the right discount rate? • Market rate gives indication of our social willingness to tradeoff current and future benefits. • Can use comparisons between risk-free and risky assets to impute “market cost” for risk. • Traditional approach. Use long term rates on govt. bonds as “risk-free” measure and then adjust for risk. • The size of adjustment varies by analysis • Assumptions about interest rate can make a big difference (see example 3.5 and Barrett)

  7. Considerations on discount rate • Should tradeoffs between present and future observed in private markets drive our public choices? • Private risks can be “hedged” or diversified. • Possibility of catastrophic changes • Public values vs. private values • If public sector uses a lower discount rate, then more projects with longer payoff periods pass cost-benefit analysis.

  8. Evidence on discount rates for environmental goods • Observed behavior on energy efficiency(high implicit discount rates) • Some survey experimental evidence points to higher discount rates.

  9. Option Value • Value of Flexibility (See class notes) • Value of new information (Example from Jinhua Zhao, Iowa State)

  10. Example: New information • Example: risk neutral planner. Will get further information about environmental benefits next year • Expected payout = $10/year • Expected NPV = (10/0.1)-84=$16 • Go ahead: invest now

  11. Example cont’d • Consider waiting till next year to decide? • If unfavorable ($5), 5/.1 < 84 (Don’t invest!) • If favorable ($15), 15/.1-84= $66 (Invest) • Expected payoff = (.5)(66)/1.1=$30 • Should not invest now! (30 > 16) • Delay helps avoid unfavorable investment that you will regret given the new information.

  12. What is the story? • Hysteresis: waiting has value when • There is uncertainty in payoff of investment • You can learn in the future by delaying • Investment is irreversible or costly reversible • The value is called option value • Much like financial option value • Example: call option: opportunity to invest in year two • Value is $30 • Investment now kills this option • Invest now only if ENPV ¸ OV, or if the benefit can cover both the cost and the OV • Investment now competes not only with no-investment, but also with investment later.

  13. Applications • Global Warming • Argument for research or learning by doing • Argument for waiting for new infromation. • Krutilla-Fisher (Pearce and Turner, ch 10) • Development decisions are irreversible. Should include value of new information.

  14. Policy Recommendations from Economists • See Arrow et. al

More Related