1 / 20

Flight Readiness Review

Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe”. Mr. Lynch- Head Mentor Mr. D. Laney, mentor Mr. M. Loughlin mentor Steven Schroeder- Program Manager Damon Emerson- Rocket design

Download Presentation

Flight Readiness Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” Mr. Lynch- Head Mentor Mr. D. Laney, mentor Mr. M. Loughlin mentor Steven Schroeder- Program Manager Damon Emerson- Rocket design Thomas Loughlin- Payload Andy Holm- Construction Gregory Katsaros- Audio Visual Nick Yuan- Safety Robert Forzano- Outreach/Publicity Chris Jardine- Communications Navin Kalluri- Communications St. Thomas High School, Houston, TX http:// rocketry.sths.org*

  2. Agenda • Mission Statement and Goals • Project Update • Launch Vehicle and Payload Summary • Vehicle Body System • Propulsion System • Recovery System • Payload System • System Tests • Full Scale Launch • Payload Experiment • Safety • Budget and Outreach

  3. Mission statement and Goals Mission Statement Our mission is to supply accurate data about cosmic radiation by building a safe and functioning rocket that can provide ample time for data collection. Our Major Project Goals •Reach an altitude of one mile. •Payload records data on ionizing radiation. •Both parachutes deploy at predetermined altitudes. •Land within one square mile. •Rocket retrievable with payload intact. •Shed light on radiation variation with altitude.

  4. Project Update • Since the CDR we have finished construction of the full-scale rocket, which included: • Coating the body tubes with fiberglass and epoxy • finishing the motor mount and attaching it and the fins to the lower body tube • Securing the nose cone to the upper body tube • Constructing full-sized payload section • Assembling and inserting the recovery system • Things we still have left to do: • Make repairs to the rocket (will explain later)

  5. Fins – (L) Fins are carefully aligned and affixed to the Motor Mount Tube with epoxy and fiberglass cloth. (R) The finished fin assembly without the all-thread rods connecting the upper and middle Centering Rings, and the Retention Bolts on the Lower Centering Ring.

  6. Centering Rings (L) Two U-bolts were placed on the Upper Centering Ring in order to distribute the forces involved in the deployment of the Shock Cord. (R) All-Thread Rods were used to connect the upper two Centering Rings, also, to distribute forces involved in ejection.

  7. Launch Vehicle and Payload Summary Vehicle: Length – 99” Gross Liftoff Weight – 17.8 lb Diameter - 5.54” Payload Mass - 4.4092 lb Motor – K700W Stability Margin – 2.92 Maximum altitude- 5400 ft Launch System - 1.5”x1.5” (10’) Section 2 weight: 3.43 lbs Section 3 weight: 4.34 lbs Recovery: Drogue – 28” at Apogee Main – 120” at 900 ft. Payload Experiment Summary: Measure levels of cosmic radiation with altitude through the use of scintillator probes whose data will be correlated with time and altitude.

  8. SYSTEMS Vehicle Body Propulsion Recovery Payload System Tests

  9. (1) Vehicle Body System | | CG CP Rocket Length: 99” Center of Gravity: 62” Center of Pressure: 78” Stability Margin: 2.92 •Modified LOC Precision Magnum 3e •Three Body Tubes (5.40”- size needed for payload) Lower (31”) – K700W, Drogue, G10 Fins Middle (28”) – Payload Bay Upper (11”) – Main Chute •Nose Cone (21”) GPS Transmitter- 151.82 MHz

  10. (2) Propulsion System •Motor: Aerotech K700W •Thrust / Weight: 10 N/ lb •Velocity off Launch Rod: 87.2 ft/s •Rail Length: 10 ft •Burn Time: 3.594 s

  11. (3) Recovery System Drogue Chute • 28” LOC Precision • Deployed at Apogee • Harness: braided nylon, 0.0625 in. thick, 30 ftin length • Deployment Velocity: 61.2 ft./s Main Chute • 120” LOC Precision • Deployment at 900 ft •Harness: braided nylon, 0.0625 in. thick, 30 ft. in length • Deployment Velocity : 71.9 ft/s Redundancy Plan • 2 Perfectflite Dual Deployment Altimeters mean velocity: • Each one will connect to a drogue and main ejection charge Landing • Landing at 152 s Section 1 KE: 37 (ft-lb) • Expected Drift: 1092 ft. Section 2 KE: 46 • Mean velocity: 24.9 ft./s Section 3 KE: 65

  12. (4) Payload System •Bay #1 - Circuit Board, Scintillator Probe •Bay #2 - Two Altimeters – Linked to ejection charges at either end of Payload Bay. Within Nose Cone •GPS Transmitter Outside of Lower Body Tube •Video camera

  13. (4) Payload System Sled holding two dual-deployment altimeters. Ring at the end of the sled is designed to hold six switches – two to activate the Altimeters, two safety switches for the Drogue, and two safety switches for the Main Parachute.

  14. Full Scale Launch • We did not test the ejection charges on ground before the flight, a mistake we certainly will not make again. • Although our rocket performed well in most aspects, our launch wasn’t successful because our recovery had two errors • The charges for the main and drogue chutes were wired backwards, the drogue chute deployed at 700 feet • The main chute did not deploy at apogee as it would have because the connecting shear pins were too thick • The rocket sustained heavy damage, but we are making repairs and will ground test this Saturday

  15. Payload Experiment Hypothesis After consideration of the effects due to terrestrial radiation, we would expect the counts to increase with elevation as the net absorption of Secondary Cosmic Radiation by the atmosphere decreases.

  16. Payload Experiment Significance (1) Radiation will be measured using scintillator probes which are much more sensitive to gamma radiation than Geiger Mueller tubes and can give as a more accurate picture of how radiation is distributed with altitude. (2) Radiation levels are suggested to be associated with changes in atmospheric conditions (such as cloud formation and global warming; chlorine production and ozone depletion) (3) Radiation levels are linked to the breakdown of DNA in organic tissue and so merit further study.

  17. System testing Tested •GPS – Locality tracking. •Camera – Video testing. •Vehicle – Scale model launch. Testing •Payload – scintillator probes and (a) consistency of data collection, (b) background counts, (c) isolation of ray sources. Will Test •Recovery – Ejection charges and chute deployment. Safety and RF Signals. •Propulsion – (a) Inspection of parts, (b) assembly supervision.

  18. safety plans Prior to each project phase: Review system risks and mitigations. Review Safety Codes. Pass test on Safety Procedures. Sign Safety Statement.

  19. Budget and Outreach • Upon completion of the rocket, documented expenses will be submitted to NASA for reimbursement. • In coordination with the Advancement Office at our school, funding requests are being forwarded to alumni and local businesses. Funds are beginning to accrue.

More Related