1 / 9

Neil Macdonald, Georgina Endfield, Lindsey McEwen & Thomas Kjeldsen

Building UK climate resilience through bridging the qualitative-quantitative data divide. Neil Macdonald, Georgina Endfield, Lindsey McEwen & Thomas Kjeldsen Workshop 1: Existing databases and uses. @UKCRP_SPF. Programme. 09.30-10.00   Tea and Coffee

adobbs
Download Presentation

Neil Macdonald, Georgina Endfield, Lindsey McEwen & Thomas Kjeldsen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Building UK climate resilience through bridging the qualitative-quantitative data divide Neil Macdonald, Georgina Endfield, Lindsey McEwen & Thomas Kjeldsen Workshop 1: Existing databases and uses @UKCRP_SPF

  2. Programme 09.30-10.00   Tea and Coffee 10.00-11.20   Introduction/Ice breaker - we would like everyone to explain their experiences, approaches and motivations in using historical datasets 11.20-12.40    A series of short talks detailing different disciplinary experiences of developing, designing and building databases for historical information   • Georgina Endfield - TEMPEST - a UK weather database   • Andrew Black - Chronology of British Hydrological Events • Jamie Hannaford - Integrating quantitative and qualitative data • Lindsey McEwen - DRY (a recent UK socio-drought project) 12.40-13.30   Lunch 13.30-14.30   Discussion 1 - Existing databases and applications 14.30-15.00   Tea and Coffee  15.00-16.00   Discussion 2 - Current uses of such databases and limitations Flood marks on the Loire river at Puy-en-Velay. M. Lang @UKCRP_SPF

  3. Introduction ‘Building UK climate resilience through bridging the qualitative-quantitative data divide’ is supported by a UKRI grant funded through the Strategic Priorities Fund (SPF) lead by NERC and the Met Office. It is a 1-year project seeks to capitalise on expertise in developing, using and blending existing datasets and in historical climatology and hydrological research in the UK. To date, research in climate resilience has placed emphasis on enhancing and improving climate models and seasonal to decadal forecasting capabilities. This network aims to adopt the principals of ACRE’s (Allan et al., 2016) ‘melded’ approach and aims to develop a new protocol for working across different types of historical qualitative and quantitative information. The protocol will bring a novel dimension to climate service provision by incorporating historical quantitative data, supported by physical weather reconstructions and narrative accounts of the impacts and responses associated with past climate variability and extreme weather events. Such historically informed and culturally and spatially contingent information could make an invaluable contribution to climate service provision, helping vulnerable communities prepare for future climate risks. Flood marks on the Loire river at Puy-en-Velay. M. Lang @UKCRP_SPF

  4. Our key objectives are to: 1. To identify existing datasets used by different organisations and practitioners, and those datasets currently developed within the different disciplines detailing past climatological and hydrological events. It will also determine what and where data gaps exist and how can these be addressed. 2. To explore current approaches to bridging across the qualitative-quantitative data divide (e.g. the application of indices to qualitative data). Identify whether new approaches can be applied to bridging the data divide from other disciplines (e.g. engineering). 3. In consultation and working with project partners, to determine the mechanism and forms of data that would be of greatest utility to practitioners for improving climate resilience. 4. Through co-production develop and share a protocol for all disciplines to work with in bridging across the qualitative-quantitative divide 5. To make this protocol available for a wide range of practitioners and stakeholders to facilitate the development of historically informed climate services Flood marks on the Loire river at Puy-en-Velay. M. Lang Sangster et al., 2018

  5. Workshop programme This will be achieved through three workshops, each with a focus reflecting the first three objectives, but throughout we will be considering the co-production of the protocol. Workshop 1 (April 2019 @ UoL)  Focus on determining and documenting existing databases available, detailing both natural events and social responses that exist within different disciplines. Examining how these are interacted with, and are used by, both academics and stakeholders. Also an introductory ‘icebreaker’ event, as many participants are unlikely to have previously met, with the network specifically transdisciplinary. Workshop 2 (28th June 2019 @ RGS London)  Focus on understanding and exploring existing approaches used to classify and bridge across the qualitative-quantitative divide, whilst also exploring new possibilities. Will also examine potential for the greater use of indices in understanding both the impacts of (vulnerability) and responses (resilience) to past events, using overlapping periods as calibration for methods explored.   Workshop 3 (~Nov 2019 @ Met Office)  Bring together the outcomes from the previous workshops and focus on the co-production of the protocol, including a plan of action for its dissemination and implementation. This protocol will be supportive of, and applicable to, the Climate Change Risk Assessment (CCRA4), and a wider range of beneficiaries.  Flood marks on the Loire river at Puy-en-Velay. M. Lang @UKCRP_SPF @UKCRP_SPF

  6. Protocol & outputs 1. As a result of the three workshops a protocol to be published in a leading journal will be developed providing a framework for bridging across the qualitative-quantitative data divide. All contributors to the three workshops will be invited to be co-authors of the protocol. 2. Another key outcome of this project will be the development of a strong interdisciplinary research network capable of tackling the complex issues associated with climate resilience that can adapt and address future calls coming forth from UKRI. 3. On project completion we will write an article for NERC's Planet Earth magazine Flood marks on the Loire river at Puy-en-Velay. M. Lang Bristol Channel (1607) & Thuringian (1613)

  7. Programme 09.30-10.00   Tea and Coffee 10.00-11.20   Introduction/Ice breaker - we would like everyone to explain their experiences, approaches and motivations in using historical datasets 11.20-12.40    A series of short talks detailing different disciplinary experiences of developing, designing and building databases for historical information   • Georgina Endfield - TEMPEST - a UK weather database   • Andrew Black - Chronology of British Hydrological Events • Jamie Hannaford - Integrating quantitative and qualitative data • Lindsey McEwen - DRY (a recent UK socio-drought project) 12.40-13.30   Lunch 13.30-14.30   Discussion 1 - Existing databases and applications 14.30-15.00   Tea and Coffee  15.00-16.00   Discussion 2 - Current uses of such databases and limitations Flood marks on the Loire river at Puy-en-Velay. M. Lang @UKCRP_SPF @UKCRP_SPF

  8. Discussion 1 - Existing databases and applications What databases are you using? How did/do you become aware of databases? What elements are important? Geographical or temporal spread? What purpose do you use the database for and why? If you don’t use such databases why and what prohibits/prevents/discourages use? Flood marks on the Loire river at Puy-en-Velay. M. Lang @UKCRP_SPF @UKCRP_SPF

  9. Discussion 2 - Current databases uses and limitations How are you using existing databases and why? Disciplinary recognition? What are the principal limitations of these databases? What improvements could be made? What would encourage you to contribute to a database? Importance and value of such sources in - Academic research - Outreach/engagement - Impact Flood marks on the Loire river at Puy-en-Velay. M. Lang @UKCRP_SPF @UKCRP_SPF

More Related