1 / 5

Supreme Court strikes down mandatory minimum gun sentences - Affordable Defence

Contact the lawyers at the Ottawa criminal law firm of Edelson Clifford D'Angelo Friedman LLP at 613-909-8153.

Download Presentation

Supreme Court strikes down mandatory minimum gun sentences - Affordable Defence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Supreme Court strikes down mandatory minimum gun sentences http://affordabledefence.com/

  2. MINIMUM SENTENCES DESCRIBED AS "CRUEL AND UNUSUAL" BY CANADA’S TOP COURT The Supreme Court of Canada has struck down mandatory minimum sentences for some gun crimes, according to CBC News. In handing down its decision, the country’s top court described the mandatory minimum sentences as “cruel and unusual” punishments that violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Under the sentencing law, convicted firearm offenders faced minimum sentences of between three to five years in prison. The decision is just the latest instance of the Supreme Court quashing tough-on-crime laws passed by the federal government in recent years. http://affordabledefence.com/

  3. MANDATORY MINIMUM LAW The mandatory minimum sentencing law for firearms offences was passed by Parliament in 2008. Under the law, first-time offenders faced a mandatory minimum sentence of three years in prison if they were convicted of possessing a prohibited loaded firearm. For repeat offenders, the minimum sentence was five years. In striking down the law, the top court expressed concern about hypothetical possibilities where such sentences would be clearly disproportionate, according to the Globe and Mail.  http://affordabledefence.com/

  4. LAW STRUCK DOWN The majority of the court, however, rejected that argument, noting that giving prosecutors such power would create a dangerous and unfair situation for defendants. The danger of subjecting otherwise law-abiding citizens to strict punishments because of an honest mistake would constitute a disproportionate and unconstitutional punishment. The court, therefore, struck down the mandatory minimum firearm sentences in a six-to-three decision. The decision is not the first time the top court has pushed back against federal tough-on-crime legislation. The court has recently struck down laws against prostitution, assisted suicide and white-collar crime and has also softened a key sentencing law by ruling that offenders have a right to receive credit for time served during pretrial detention. http://affordabledefence.com/

  5. Thank You http://affordabledefence.com/

More Related