1 / 13

The Plan… 17 Oct 2013

The Plan… 17 Oct 2013. Continue on with Chapter 7 Criminal Law Trial Procedure Presentation Assigned work: Finish yesterday’s assignment(s) Start new assignment(s) Court room procedure etc. 7 .2 – The criminal Trial Process. The Criminal Trial Process Intro.

agalia
Download Presentation

The Plan… 17 Oct 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Plan… 17 Oct 2013 • Continue on with Chapter 7 • Criminal Law Trial Procedure • Presentation • Assigned work: • Finish yesterday’s assignment(s) • Start new assignment(s) • Court room procedure etc.

  2. 7.2 – The criminal Trial Process

  3. The Criminal Trial Process Intro • A criminal trial is an adversarial process that pits the Crown against the accused. • Section 11(d) Canadian Charter of Rightsstates that each person charged with an offense is: • “presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law” • This is where “burden of proof” comes into play…

  4. The Criminal Trial Process (p174) • Key Point: burden of proof • …is the Crown’s obligation to prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt • proof of guilt must be beyond a reasonable doubt

  5. The Criminal Trial Process II (Crown) • The Crown’s Opening Statement • starts the trial • They do so as they have the “burden of proof” • includes: • offence committed • summary of evidence to be presented • general outline of how Crown will present its case • Direct Examination • …is the first questioning of a witness to determine what he or she observed about the crime • completed by Crown counsel

  6. The Criminal Trial Process III (Defence) • Cross-Examination • …is the second questioning of a witness to test the accuracy of the testimony • performed by Defence counsel • Motion for Dismissal • Defence may bring a motion for dismissal – a request to the judge that the charges against the accused by dropped • This is done if council believes that Crown has failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt • If judge agrees, case withdrawn from jury = directed verdict of not guilty • The Defence’s Opening Statement • …is summary of arguments to be used by defence

  7. The Criminal Trial Process IV • Direct Examination by Defence • questioning of own witnesses by Defence counsel • Defence brings witnesses to refute the Crown’s testimony • Done so show reasonable doubt • Cross Examination by Crown • questioning of defence witnesses by Crown counsel • The defendant may also choose to testify on their behalf at this time • Crown Rebut • …is the Crown’s chance to contradict evidence introduced by Defence • DefenceSurrebuttal • …is a reply to Crown’s rebuttal • Closing Statements by both sides

  8. Rules of Evidence • “I object!!!” - The following questions and answers posed or provided in court may be ‘objected’ to by either counsel: • Judge must decide if the evidence is “admissible” (accepted) to the court; objection can occur with: • leading questions • …is a question designed to elicit a specific answer • i.e.: “So, you hate Bob, right?” • hearsay statements • …evidence given by a witness based on information they received from a third party • i.e.: “Terry told me Larry stabbed Bob.” • opinion statements • …witnesses cannot offer opinions unless they are recognized experts offering opinions on their area of knowledge

  9. Rules of Evidence II • immaterial or irrelevant questions • …are questions that have no direct application to the case at hand • non-responsive answers • …when a witness provides an answer that doesn’t answer the question that was asked Of note: In cross-examination, counsel may ask leading questions as long as it pertained to previous testimony. - i.e. statement made (to witness) “You want this court to believe you saw Manny trying to hang Mr. Hill in a noose?” The question refers to a fact – the witness saw Manny try and hang Mr. Hill – a fact that was already established in the direct examination…

  10. Types of Evidence • Evidence is the information that will prove or disprove disputed facts in a court of law. • Evidence must be “material”, that is relevant and important to the case • direct evidence • …is the testimony given by a witness to prove an alleged fact • i.e.: an eyewitness (Austin saw Manny make the noose and put it around Mr. Hill’s neck) • circumstantial evidence • …is indirect evidence that leads to a reasonable inference of the defendant’s guilt • i.e. someone gets assaulted & robbed, purse found in garbage can with accused finger prints on it. No one saw who did the assault & robbery, but have an idea the accused is responsible • is generally admissible in court – judge must be convinced that defendant’s guilt is one of possible conclusions that could be drawn from the circumstantial evidence

  11. Types of Evidence II • character evidence • …is evidence used to establish the likelihood that the defendant is the type of person who either would or would not commit a certain offence • Crown may not introduce ‘bad character’ evidence • i.e. past convictions of defendant, attack credibility not character • Defence may introduce ‘good character’ evidence • Done to sway the jury etc. to the fact that the accused could never do such a thing • electronic surveillance • …the use of any electronic device to overhear or record communications between two or more people • wiretapping – intercepting phone communications • bugging – recording oral communications • Must be established by court order, unless emergency situation

  12. Types of Evidence III • polygraph tests • ‘lie-detector’ test • measures changes in pulse, respiration, and blood pressure • not 100% accurate • Relies on the competence & accuracy of examiner • results not admissible as evidence, but anything said by defendant during testing is admissible • voir dire • …is a mini-trial in which jurors are excluded while the admissibility of evidence is discussed • Most common use, decide if accused confession was given in good faith.

  13. Ok, that’s it… • What you can do: • Finish yesterday’s work if not done so already… • NEW assignment(s) • Court Room Layout • Court Room Q&A • Court Personnel Roles • Read and answer the questions… • Definitions… good news/bad news scenario

More Related