1 / 16

What to expect from this presentation

Advocating for SRHR in Brussels presentation by Mascha Matthews DSW EU Liaison Office, Brussels 08 May 2007. 2 - Who are the advocacy targets?. 1 - Who are the SRHR advocates?. 4 - What lessons can be learned. 3 - How do we work?. What to expect from this presentation.

Download Presentation

What to expect from this presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Advocating for SRHR in Brusselspresentation by Mascha MatthewsDSW EU Liaison Office, Brussels08 May 2007

  2. 2 - Who are the advocacy targets? 1 - Who are the SRHR advocates? 4 - What lessons can be learned 3 - How do we work? What to expect from this presentation Advocating for SRHR in Brussels

  3. 1 2 3 4 Grant-funded advocacy & projects IPPF European Network ► Member Associations in almost all EU Member States ►Some very strong IPPF Member Associations, have advocacy staff, increasing focus on EU level ►Some very small, hardly any staff at all - trying to find ways to increase capacity Gates – European Advocacy for RH ►IPPF EN is chair + 8 national European RH advocacy organizations + European Parliamentary network ►Advocacy and media activities at both national and Brussels/EU level + study tours

  4. 1 2 3 4 Grant-funded advocacy & projects MacArthur - EuroNGOs ►Formal coalition, including IPPF Member Associations and other national organizations that do advocacy related to global SRHR ►EuroNGOs does not do advocacy as a coalition but shares information

  5. 1 2 3 4 Core advocates/coalitions “Brussex” ►DSW, IPPF European Network, MSI, StopAIDS Alliance, GCM, IPM, European Parliamentary Forum, etc ►Informal group of SRHR and HIV/AIDS advocates ►Meets every 4-6 weeks to share information about policy developments and advocacy opportunities ►Loosely coordinates work “Global Fund Brussels” ►Some of above + Open Society Institute ►Similar to BRUSSEX but focuses specifically on advocacy related to the GFATM

  6. 1 2 3 4 Secondary advocates/coalitions “OVC Group” ►Some of above + WorldVision, Save the Children, HelpAge, CARE, etc. ►Developed an annual action plan and meets regularly to coordinate its implementation “Gender lunch group” ►some of above plus women’s rights groups ►Very informal, meets over “brown bag” lunch to share information CONCORD Europe ►Europe-wide networks and national platforms of development NGOs ►Formal coalition, with staffed secretariat ►Special consultative relationship with European Commission ►Sometimes an SRHR advocacy target

  7. 1 2 3 4 The European Commission (EC) European Commission ► Proposes legislation: e.g. European Consensus on Development ► Not only obvious Directorate General’s ► Difficult to find out where to go: DG Dev/AIDCO ► Ask simple questions – EC has to find an answer

  8. 1 2 3 4 The European Parliament (EP) European Parliament ► Good relations with MEPs (assistants): - Influence reports - Push for questions asked to EC and Council - Source of information ► Focus on key MEPs on the dossier ► Strategic: through political groups and committees

  9. 1 2 3 4 The Council of Ministers (the Member States) Council of Ministers • ► Visits to Permanent Representations: • - Source of information, better understanding MS standpoints • Influence Council Regulations • ► Support from big MS is necessary • ► Involved in entire process; can be lobbied at all stages

  10. 3 4 1 2 Advocacy methods Advocacy Methods ►Develop and maintain relationships with key decision-makers, MEPs, etc. to get information about upcoming developments ►Conduct strategic outreach for specific interventions ►Develop “input” papers at the right time ►Participate in formal consultations ►Workshops/roundtables/seminars ►Petitions

  11. 4 3 1 2 Vision about Europe Overview on the European Union ► Where should the EU go and how should it relate to the South? ► What is Europe’s role in development cooperation (as opposed to US administration etc)? ► What is Europe’s role with regards to SRHR?

  12. 4 3 1 2 What do we ask from the EU/EC? We have got: ► Beautiful wording in policy documents ► EC funding has been decided upon (and has decreased) What do we precisely ask for?

  13. 4 3 1 2 Targets – Who is really in power? Who is in power? ► Be in solidarity with organisations with a broader/other mandate  Improve knowledge on powerful NGOs ► Focus on Member States: - Double aid - Development policy decided by MS - Decisions made in capitals (especially in new MS) - Division of labour  Outreach to Perm Reps ► Opponents: -Do you reach out to them? Defense or Attack? -Agree to disagree -Get policy makers on board if you can

  14. 4 3 1 2 Method – How to be most effective? (1) How to be effective? ► Messages: - New and innovative, no expert language - Political framework: MDGs, Acquis – how can you achieve your goals? - Economic rewards - Data, no emotions ► Include the South ► Understanding of political environment (underlying policy trends)

  15. 4 3 1 2 Method – How to be most effective? (2) How to be effective? ► Provide alternatives, not JUST critique ► Timing – hard to identify the right timing ► More media action => Media workshop & strategy ► Brussex

  16. ??? QUESTIONS ???

More Related