1 / 11

Conquering The Performance Appraisal (PA) Challenge

Conquering The Performance Appraisal (PA) Challenge. Gary Blau, Ph.D. Temple University 215-204-6906 gblau@sbm.temple.edu. Role Of PA In The Employment Process. Forecast/Plan > Job Analysis > Recruit > Select > Orient & Train > Perform > PA > Reward > Stay/Go Why Do PA:

alton
Download Presentation

Conquering The Performance Appraisal (PA) Challenge

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Conquering The Performance Appraisal(PA) Challenge Gary Blau, Ph.D. Temple University 215-204-6906 gblau@sbm.temple.edu

  2. Role Of PA In The Employment Process • Forecast/Plan > Job Analysis > Recruit > Select > Orient & Train > Perform > PA > Reward > Stay/Go • Why Do PA: Employer: justify employee decisions; identify training needs; improve employee morale Employee: receive feedback; clarify path to rewards • Ideal People Portfolio

  3. Three Key Questions For PA Right Dimensions (including weighting) ? Fair PA Process ? Meaningful Rewards ? Other ?

  4. Types of PA Formats By Criteria

  5. Sample of Behaviorally Anchored Rating –“Initiative” Initiative = “ability to be proactive and exercise self-reliance as a behavior” 1 = (poor), reactive; only does what told; requires too much attention 2 = (below average), follows instructions; occasionally does a little more 3 = (average); can work independently; sometimes needs to wait for instructions 4 = (good), grasps situation effectively; goes to work without hesitating 5 = (excellent), always ahead of events; anticipates; clearly exceeds expectations of supervisor, co-workers, customers

  6. PA Challenges • Rater Errors & Biases (examples ?) • Organizational Politics • Individual Versus Group Focus • Technology: PA software packages e.g., www.shrm.org; search “performance appraisal software” • Other ?

  7. Keys For A Legally Defensible PA System • Based on: up-to-date job descriptions, documented observables (use diary for each employee) • Written appraisals conducted regularly for all (record reasonable accommodation requests separately) • Raters trained: use measure, avoid errors/bias; Frame of Reference training; interviewer • Get employee to sign-off (acknowledge, can disagree) • Provide appeals process for employee • Use more than one rater source, including employee • Show continuity (previous development goals, now evaluate) • Other ?

  8. The Performance Interview • 5 issues: Interviewer Skills; Preparation (Supervisor & Employee); Process; Substance; Follow-up • Get the Employee (Ee) to “take ownership” of any problem behaviors; get Ee to state: problem behavior; outcomes of problem behavior; consequences of continuing • 3 thoughts: maintain Ee self-esteem; listen with empathy (not sympathy); get Ee’s help in problem solving

  9. 5 Questions An Employee Should Be Able To Answer After Their PA Interview • Exactly how well am I doing? • Exactly where do I need to improve? • How did my supervisor reach his/her conclusions? • What help will I get? • What will the consequences be (positive and negative)?

  10. Other PA Issues & References • Timing (employee anniversary vs. all at once) • Role of prior PAs in disciplining an employee • Is the PA process working ? (part of employee survey) • Top management commitment to PA process, managers accountable for doing PAs? • Fit with organization’s culture? References: Gomez-Mejia, L. 2001. Managing human resources. Prentice Hall. Carrell, M. 2000. Human resource management. Dryden. Johnson, C. 2001. “Making sure employees measure up”. HR Magazine, March, Vol.46 (3), 36-43. Grensing-Pophal, L. 2001. “Motivate managers to review performance”. HR Magazine, Vol. 46 (3), p.45-48

  11. Why Invest In Behaviorally-based Performance Scales • A More Motivated Workforce • A More Motivated Group of Supervisors • A More Accountable Group of Supervisors • A More Respected/Effective HR Function • TRANSLATION – a more satisfied and loyal workforce with greater positive retention (keeping higher performers), and fewer employee complaints/problem behaviors, and reduced likelihood of future employee litigation

More Related