1 / 14

IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC

IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC. CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007. Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee. 1 General Observations. SME and SMP topping agenda Concerns over regulatory overload Standards lack relevance to SME/SMP…

Download Presentation

IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IFRS for SMEs: Views of IFAC CAPA Osaka Conference, Osaka, October 5, 2007 Sylvie Voghel Chair, IFAC Small and Medium Practices Committee

  2. 1 General Observations • SME and SMP topping agenda • Concerns over regulatory overload • Standards lack relevance to SME/SMP… • …and SME/SMP lack ability to efficiently comply • IFAC SMP Committee • Ensure standards reflect SME/SMP • Succinct, relevant, understandable guidance

  3. 2 IFRS for SMEsIntroduction • IFAC has closely tracked and input since start • Globally applicable standard, consistently implemented • Ease compliance burden on preparers • Ensure benefits exceed cost • Release of ED is milestone • IFAC supports project & committed to assisting IASB secure optimal outcome

  4. 2 IFRS for SMEsIFAC’s Role • Encouraged member bodies, regional accountancy organizations to contribute to debate • Promoted conduct of field tests – more member bodies need to join • Getting SMEs and SMPs engaged • Responding to ED • Pragmatic approach – focus on major things

  5. 2 IFRS for SMEsIFAC Comment Letter 1 Recognition & measurement simplifications: • Elimination of deferred tax • Amortization of goodwill • Simplified impairment tests • Modifications to financial assets and liabilities

  6. 2 IFRS for SMEsIFAC Comment Letter 2 Eliminate all cross references: • Remove altogether certain topics – segment reporting, EPS and interim reporting • Remove most options – cost method only for PP&E, intangibles, investment property & when consolidating associates and joint ventures

  7. 2 IFRS for SMEsIFAC Comment Letter • Cost-benefit overriding objective • Restructure – topics not relevant to all at back • Rationalize disclosures – focus on financial position • Post-implementation review • Exclude very small entities with few external users

  8. 3 Micro-Entity Financial ReportingPhase 1 • Concerns expressed at IFAC SMP Forums • Project aim – to inform debate • Micro-Entity Financial Reporting: Perspectives of Preparers and Users, December 2006 • Summary of existing research evidence • Lack of research

  9. 3 Micro-Entity Financial ReportingPhase 2 • Focus group interviews of owners, financiers & preparers • Kenya, Italy, Poland, UK & Uruguay • Investigates whether proposed IFRS for SMEs: • likely to meet needs of users • can be easily applied by preparers • What changes to ED may be necessary for it to be suitable for micro-entities?

  10. 3 Micro-Entity Financial ReportingPhase 2 • Mixed support for international guidance for micro-entities • ED too complex and long for micro-entities • Characteristics of any new guidance: • Simplicity, few rules, infrequent updates, short, & applicable to all

  11. 3 Micro-Entity Financial ReportingPhase 2 • Outline content - general support for: • Fixed format statements, simple disclosure checklist, clear rules for common transactions, & statement of principles • Précis version for owners and longer one for preparers • Internet and hard copy

  12. 3 Micro-Entity Financial ReportingPhase 2 • Conclusions: • ED appears unsuitable for micro-entities • Relatively minor changes to ED will not be sufficient for micro-entities • No clear case for separate tier of micro-entity guidance • Some form of assurance needed for micro-entity financial reports

  13. 4 Assurance Services for SMEs • Inappropriate for IFAC to dictate policy • If there is sufficient demand then IAASB should make available appropriate standards • SMP Committee welcomes IAASB proposals to: • Revise ISRE 2400 Engagements to Review Financial Statements; and • Explore alternative assurance service and, if appropriate, develop a standard if different from review

  14. www.ifac.org

More Related