1 / 15

DACNET: An Intranet of DAC connecting Directorates & Field Units

DACNET: An Intranet of DAC connecting Directorates & Field Units. Requirement: Dialup for Field Units Dedicated Link for Directorates. Network Design.

awentia
Download Presentation

DACNET: An Intranet of DAC connecting Directorates & Field Units

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DACNET: An Intranet of DAC connecting Directorates & Field Units Requirement: Dialup for Field Units Dedicated Link for Directorates

  2. Network Design • While finalizing on the network design aspects regarding topology, other networking module requirements and network protocol usage, it is essential to keep the bandwidth requirements in perspective. Some of the factors which influence the required bandwidth are: • Type of application • Type of transaction (interactive/batch) • No. of simultaneous users on the network • Transaction size • Response time expected

  3. VSAT (Very Small Aperture Terminal) • Outdoor Unit: Antenna & RFT Antenna: Reflector, Feedhorn & Mount RFT: LNA, Down Converters Upconverters, HPA • Indoor Unit: Functions as a modem and also interfaces with end user equipment

  4. VSAT Applications • Superior quality full mesh telephony with fax • High volume file transfers • Video conferencing on demand • Internet access • Point-of-sale credit card and check verification • Electronic funds transfer for debit cards, pharmacy adjudication, and electronic benefits • High volume, secure automatic teller machine (ATM) transactions • "Back office" applications such as accounting, time and attendance, and e-mail • Wireless local loop (WLL) connectivity

  5. Advantages of VSATs • Last Mile Problem: Guarantee seamless communication even across the last mile • Reach • Reliability: (99.5 %, 80-85% in case of Lease Line) • Support for mission-critical applications: ERP, Billing & finance and data broadcast • Time: Less deployment time) • Flexibility: Enormous expansion capabilities • System Integration: Single point of contact • Network Management • Maintenance: Low Mean Time Repair (MTTR) • Cost: Pay-by-mile concept in case of lease line

  6. VSAT System Architecture Consists of: Space Segment: Satellite transponder Ground Segment: Central HUB or MES Remote VSATs Topologies: Star Mesh Hybrid

  7. Access Technologies • Time Division Multiple Access(TDMA) • Frequency Division Multiple Access(FDMA) • Code Division Multiple Access(CDMA) • Demand Assigned Multiple Access(DAMA) • Pre-Assigned Multiple Access(PAMA) • Frequency-Time Division Multiple Access(FTDMA)

  8. Frequency bands

  9. Why Ku Band? • Capable of offering up to 45 Mbps • Hardware Economics • Very small Antenna sizes up to 0.75 m • Very strong satellite traponders • Most suitable for web eanabled applications without any bottlenechs in terms of bandwidth/availability • Offering broadcasting and Multicasting Turbo Internet Appliactions • Internet connectivity without any legacy bottlenecks

  10. When designing a WAN using satellite as a transmission medium, planning for the right band of operation is imperative. Any band of operation whether C, Ext-C or Ku band has to be looked at from following perspectives: • Availability over Indian Sub-continent • Long term perspective • Commercial & Technical Issues • Ku band statistics

  11. Since Ku band frequency of operation is very high, the size of ground equipment such as antenna reduces to quite an extent. Also since most of the Ku band transponders are high power (typically EIRP of 44 DBW as against 32 DBW in C Band) even the radio frequency terminals (RFT) required are small, hence overall sizes for ground equipment go down considerably. For example, if it needs 3.8 meter antenna with a 5W RF to uplink 64 Kbps SCPC carrier in C/Ext-C band, the same carrier can be uplinked using 1.8/2.4 Meter antenna with 0.5W RFT.

  12. Availability: Ku band is very standard band for operation all over the world. Large no. of satellites with Ku band transponders are available. Over Indian sub-continet also Ku band is available through INTELSAT, INSAT 3B and PANAMSAT. Moving from one satellite to another is not an issue, since availability is universal. Disaster recovery of transponder and satellite is taken care of due to the flexibility to change to another satellite. Long Term Perspective: Operation in Ku band are brighter in term of availability of transponders, Economics of scale in terms of bulk production of the H/W electronics globally.

  13. Commercial & Technical Issues: Ku band transponders have higher EIRP, the cost of hiring a transponder is higher than that of either C or Ext-C Band. However it is more than offset by lower capital expenditure on the ground equipment. Besides, as contracted bandwidth increases, economics of scale come into play and it becomes even more viable. • The only technical issue that needs to be taken care of with Ku band is rain fade that can be taken care of by • Installing Uplink Power Control (UPC) at the hub site • By building the rain fade margins into the link calculations and selecting appropriate RFT

  14. Response of SkyBlaster and DirecWay VSATs • Upload/Download speed and Round Trip Time(RTT) were observed for DirecWay 4020 and SkyBlaster 360E VSAT systems. The results are summarized below: • A file of 3.5 MB was uploaded to ALPHA server on NIC LAN and ICAR server on RF Link. The upload speed of SkyBlaster is better. There is a difference of the order 4.54 Kbytes/Sec. in upload. • A file of 3.5 MB was downloaded from ALPHA and ICAR servers. The download speed of DirecWay VSAT is found to be better than SkyBlaster. There is a significant difference in the speed if content server (ALPHA) is in NIC LAN. The difference is of order 14.7 Kbytes/Sec. if content server (ICAR) is on RF Link. • A file of 1.16 MB and 1.5 MB was downloaded from Internet sites. The difference is nominal in both the VSAT systems. • The analysis of Round Trip Time reveals that the SkyBlaster is more consistent. • Both the VSAT systems have maintained 8/32 Kbps connectivity.

More Related