1 / 40

CEDM Annual Meeting Paul Fischbeck EPP and SDS Carnegie Mellon University 17 May 2011

Decision Support Tools for 1) Investigating Trends in the US Vehicle Fleet 2) Nuclear Power Plant Shutdown. CEDM Annual Meeting Paul Fischbeck EPP and SDS Carnegie Mellon University 17 May 2011. Fleet Trends Project Course. Undergraduate, semester-long, capstone course 23 undergrads

barney
Download Presentation

CEDM Annual Meeting Paul Fischbeck EPP and SDS Carnegie Mellon University 17 May 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Decision Support Tools for 1) Investigating Trends in the US Vehicle Fleet2) Nuclear Power Plant Shutdown CEDM Annual Meeting Paul Fischbeck EPP and SDS Carnegie Mellon University 17 May 2011

  2. Fleet Trends Project Course Undergraduate, semester-long, capstone course • 23 undergrads • Social and Decision Sciences (SDS) • Engineering and Public Policy (EPP) • 2 graduate student managers • Mohd Nor Azman Hassad • Thomas Yu • 2 faculty • Iris Grossmann • Paul Fischbeck

  3. Trade-offs • Fuel economy and … • Performance • Safety • Practicality • Life cycle costs • How have these metrics changed over time? • Airbags make lighter more fuel efficient vehicles safer, right?

  4. Databases • Ward’s Automotive (1990-2010) • National new car sales by make and model for each year • Hedges & Company (2010) • State-level car population by make, model, and model year • Kelley Blue Book (1990-2010) • List and used car prices • Detailed specifications by make, model, and year • FARS (Fatality Analysis Reporting System) • Fatalities from automobile crashes • NHTSA • NHTS/NPTS (National Household Travel Survey) (1995,2001,2009) • DOT Federal Highway Administration • 5-Star Safety Rating • NHTSA Safety ratings for cars • Others • US Census, EIA (fuel prices, power mix)

  5. Interface to the Integrated Database By combining metrics and filters, over 1,200 different graphs possible

  6. Life-Cycle Analysis • Inventory Analysis • Considers the individual inputs (energy, materials) and outputs of the product at each stage • Stages: material production, product manufacture, assembly, distribution, use, disposal • Variables to track: energy, emissions, costs • Impact Analysis • Combines environmental impacts into one total impact number • Improvement Analysis • Determine how to reduce the environmental impact of the product

  7. GREET Model • Argonnes National Laboratory • Calculates the life-cycle energy use and emissions for vehicle production • MPG (KBB) • Lifetime miles driven (NHTS/NPTS) • Vehicle type- SUV, passenger cars (KBB) • Year (KBB) • Weight (KBB) • Country of assembly (KBB) • Separate GREET model run for each of the 6,000 make/model/year vehicles in the Ward’s Automotive database

  8. 2005 1990

  9. Emissions Trends by List Price

  10. Emissions Trends by List Price

  11. Emissions Trends by List Price

  12. Emissions Trends by List Price

  13. Emission Trends by Vehicle Type

  14. Emission Trends by Vehicle Type

  15. Emission Trends by Vehicle Type

  16. Emission Trends by Vehicle Type

  17. Comparison: Weight of Vehicles (Year – 2000) In 73% of crashes, vehicles with no fatalities weighted more In 27% of crashes, vehicles with fatalities weighted more

  18. Weight – Safety Tradeoff At equal weight, 3% benefit to safer vehicle Heavier vehicles (safety rating 5) have less probability of fatality compared to lighter vehicles of the same safety rating

  19. Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants • Since Fukushima, there has been discussion of the risks imposed by nuclear power plants • Question: Given various decision rules, what would be the impact on environmental and economic metrics • Natural risks (earthquakes, hurricanes, tornados • Plant characteristics (individual, age, manufacturer) • Characteristics of surrounding region (population, political support) • Joint work with David Rode from DAI and Thomas Yu (EPP Masters 2011)

  20. Reasons for Curtailing Operations Tornado Alley Earthquake and Nuclear Power Plants

  21. Method • All power generation facilities for each NERC region were modeled (total over 16,000 plants) • Historical capacity factor • Emissions rates • Variable costs (sorted) • Nuclear plants were turned off based on decision criteria • Lost production made up by increasing the output of plants with extra capacity in order of marginal cost • NERC forced outage rates for coal and gas • Average cost of generation calculated (does not include T&D) • Infinitely elastic (no pipeline capacity limits) • For some scenarios, increase demand would send NG prices very high • Additional NOx, SO2, and CO2 emissions tracked • Additional coal and natural gas consumption determined • Pipeline capacity would be reached for some regions well before demand is met

  22. Interface

  23. Emissions Trends by Country

  24. Emissions Trends by Country

  25. Emissions Trends by Country

  26. Emissions Trends by Country

  27. Emissions Trends by Country

  28. Trends in Emissions by MPG Category

  29. Trends in Emissions by MPG Category

  30. Trends in Emissions by MPG Category

  31. Trends in Emissions by MPG Category

  32. Trends in Emissions by MPG Category

  33. Trends in Emissions by MPG Category

  34. Trends in Emissions by MPG Category

More Related