1 / 38

Learning Outcomes Assessment in Student Services

Learning Outcomes Assessment in Student Services. A Statewide Initiative in Maryland’s Sixteen Community Colleges. Context. Maryland’s Community College Governance Structure Maryland Higher Education Commission (MHEC) Maryland Association of Community Colleges Liaison with MHEC

bat
Download Presentation

Learning Outcomes Assessment in Student Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Learning Outcomes Assessment in Student Services A Statewide Initiative in Maryland’s Sixteen Community Colleges

  2. Context Maryland’s Community College Governance Structure • Maryland Higher Education Commission (MHEC) • Maryland Association of Community Colleges • Liaison with MHEC • Government Relations • Community College Financing • Public Relations • Economic Development and Job Training • Research • Education

  3. Context Nine Affinity Groups • Chief Academic Officers • Chief Student Services Officers • Chief Administrative Officers • Chief Planning and Institutional Research Officers • Continuing Education Officers • Development Officers • Public Relations Officers • Information Technology Officers • Facility Planning Officers

  4. Context Student Services Affinity Groups • Registrars and Admissions Officers • Financial Aid • Intercollegiate Athletics • Student Life • Academic Advising/Counseling • Testing Centers • Career Counseling • Tutoring

  5. Genesis • For 10 years, professional organizations have underscored the need to assess student services • Emphasis on learning outcomes assessment for accreditation • NASPA Conference –Emphasis on learning outcomes assessment in student services

  6. Maryland LOA Project– Started June 2003 Student Learning Assessment Workshopwith State Deans/VPsFacilitated byMarilee Bresciani • Established goals for the project • Discussed concept of core indicators • Developed process for developing a statewide assessment plan

  7. Project Goals • Shift focus of assessment from student satisfaction to student learning • Assist student services staff to learn to design, implement and analyze learning outcomes projects • Assist staff to improve student services and programs based on learning outcomes data • Create benchmarks for comparison of findings across institutions throughout the state

  8. Process – October 2003 The Year of Assessment for Student Services in Maryland Community Colleges Workshop • 150 staff attended a workshop facilitated by Dr. Marilee Bresciani and guided by the Deans/VPs • An overview of learning outcomes assessment • Participants assigned to groups by functional area • Brainstormed core learning values and ways to gather evidence of learning • Identified one core value to start the process

  9. Assist Students to BecomeSelf-Directed Learners Deans/VPs clarified • Clearly defined “core value” of self-directed learner • Developed a matrix to distribute to the Affinity Group chairs • Established what was wanted from Affinity Groups

  10. Definition of Self-Directed Learner The student will: • Define a need or problem and employ effective decision-making to resolve it • Plan ahead/set goals • Acquire knowledge • Use available resources • Seek assistance from appropriate people/experts • Apply critical analysis to consider options • Evaluate decisions

  11. Definition of Self-Directed Learner Affinity groups focused on: • Outcomes • Strategies • Measurements • Benchmarks • Feedback loops

  12. Process – October 2004 • Deans/VPs sponsored a third workshop, another statewide meeting of student services staff with an assessment expert • Workshop focused on assessment methodology and measurement

  13. Examples • Advising/Counseling Affinity Group • CCBC Academic Advising Project • Intercollegiate Athletics Affinity Group

  14. CCBC ExampleAcademic Advising Project • See Handout –CCBC - Learning Outcomes Project for Academic Advising 2005-06

  15. Spring/Summer 2005 • Deans and VPs sponsored a fourth workshop facilitated by assessment experts in April 2005 • Assisted affinity groups to finalize statewide projects • Developed time table for implementation of the project • Affinity groups finalized their work by the end of June and submitted their plans to the Chairperson of the Deans/VP group by June 30 • Campus plans were developed over the summer and submitted to Chairperson of the Deans/VP groups in September.

  16. Transitioning from Statewide Projects to College Plans • Customized projects to fit mission, programs and services of the individual colleges • Integrated statewide project into the lexicon and structures for assessment at each institution

  17. Montgomery CollegeGermantown Campus • Small campus in multi-campus college • Student services not organized like other colleges • Multiple outcomes projects • No tracking system

  18. Montgomery College Example-First Year Experience Program • See Handout –Montgomery College - Learning Outcomes Plan for First Year Experience Program 2005-06

  19. The College is Serious…. • Unit strategic objectives all have “outcomes” “outputs” “and “assessment results” attached • Strategic plan is the only way to get $$ or positions • Tracking system is on the way

  20. CCBC’s Plan • Convened student services affinity group representatives across the college and staff from institutional research • Asked staff to review affinity group plan and submit college projects • Draft submitted to Deans in August 2005 • Draft submitted to Coordinator of Learning Outcomes Assessment for the College and College Vice Chancellor for Learning and Student Development • Plan approved September 2005

  21. Harford’s Plan • See Handout –Harford Community College - Learning Outcomes Plan for Registration Services 2005-06

  22. Challenges Encountered Instructing staff across functions and colleges how to develop learning outcomes assessment projects • Staff wanted to develop a menu of core indicators rather than focus on one indicator • Deans/VPs kept groups focused on one indicator as a way of helping staff to learn the outcomes assessment process

  23. Research by Dr. Bob Baer (2005) The two most difficult learning college principles to implement in student services are • assessment of learning • inclusion of students as full partners in the learning process, i.e. developing students to be self-directed learners.

  24. Next Steps • Colleges are now implementing projects • Colleges will analyze their data over the summer, refine their projects, and prepare to re-implement them in fall 2006 • Affinity groups will review college results over the summer, benchmark findings and prepare a report for the State Deans/VPs in September 2006

More Related