1 / 19

Teaching for Transfer: Theory and Practice

Teaching for Transfer: Theory and Practice. Adrienne Jankens & Thomas Trimble 2013 Fall Orientation. Transfer Defined. “The ability to extend what one has learned in one context to new contexts” ( Bransford , 1996). “Preparation for future learning” ( Bransford and Schwarz, 1999).

binh
Download Presentation

Teaching for Transfer: Theory and Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Teaching for Transfer: Theory and Practice Adrienne Jankens & Thomas Trimble 2013 Fall Orientation

  2. Transfer Defined • “The ability to extend what one has learned in one context to new contexts” (Bransford, 1996). • “Preparation for future learning” (Bransford and Schwarz, 1999)

  3. Basic Concepts • Low-road transfer (car to truck) • Automatic, stimulus-driven • High-road transfer • Mindful, deliberate • Near transfer- from one context to another similar context • from algebra to geometry • Far transfer- from one context to a seemingly unrelated context • from algebra to cooking • Negative transfer-when experience in one context hurts performance in another • from soccer to basketball

  4. Characteristics of Learning and Transfer (Bransford) • Initial learning is necessary for transfer • New learning involves transfer based on previous learning • Transfer is best viewed as a dynamic, active process • Transfer is not a unitary process-different routes to transfer

  5. Factors that impact transfer • Abstraction-transfer is enhanced by instruction that helps students reconstruct problems at higher levels of abstraction • Abstraction builds bridges between different contexts • Learner-generated abstractions promote transfer better than instructor-supplied abstractions • Transfer is difficult when knowledge is over-contextualized (only taught in one highly specific context) • Prompting • Helping students see the potential for transfer in other settings and contexts • Reflection (metacognition) • Self-monitoring

  6. Engaging and Recontextualizing Prior Knowledge • Rounsaville, Goldberg, and Bawarshi (2008): Prompting and encouraging students to reflect on what prior knowledge is influencing their approaches to new writing tasks is key for their development of metacognition • Reiff and Bawarshi (2011): “Boundary crossing” and “boundary guarding” • Nowacek (2011); Rounsaville (2012): Students work through a negotiation between prior knowledge and present task • Roberston, Taczak, and Yancey (2012): “remixing,” “assemblage,” and “critical incidents”

  7. Discussion • Reflection as a genre? • The vocabulary of reflection?

  8. Teaching for Transfer: Practice Adrienne Jankens & Thomas Trimble 2013 Fall Orientation

  9. Goals • Provide activities that promote high-road transfer across writing contexts (both near and far) • Forward-reaching—preparing for future tasks • Backward-reaching—approaching current tasks using learning from past experiences

  10. Scaffolding and Sequencing • Help students learn to write reflection • Use reflection to support the development of other writing projects • Build reflective activities to lead effectively to the final reflective text: the reflective argument essay

  11. Tools • Engaging Prior Knowledge: KWL (Ogle)

  12. Tools Thomas • Journal Prompts • Describe a time when an argument changed your mind. • Describe a time when you encountered a writing task that you did not know how to complete. What did you do? • What was the most difficult part of this assignment? How did you deal with that difficulty? • What part of this assignment is still fuzzy?

  13. Tools • In-Process Reflections: tuning-in journal, talk-backs

  14. Tools Thomas • Letter to the Reader (from Sandra Giles’s article “Reflective Thinking and the Revision Process”)

  15. Tools • Tying to Course Learning Outcomes: strategies for making them accessible • Clear identification on schedule • Discussion of terms (via KWL) • Midterm practice

  16. Tools Thomas • Outcomes Memo

  17. Discussion

  18. Resources • 1020 Teaching Resource Site • Bransford and Schwartz. “Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications.” Review of Research in Education. 24.1, Jan. 1999: 61-100. Web. • Giles, Sandra. “Reflective Thinking and the Revision Process.” Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing. Vol. 1 Ed. Charles Lowe and PavelZemliansky. • “Learning and Transfer.” How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Eds. John D. Bransfordet al. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000. 51-78. • Perkins, D.N. and Gavriel Salomon. “Rocky Road to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanisms of a Neglected Phenomenon.” Educational Psychologist 24.2 (1989): 113-142.

  19. Resources • Nowacek, Rebecca. Agents of Integration: Understanding Transfer as a Rhetorical Act. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 2011. Print. • Reiff, Mary Jo and AnisBawarshi. “Tracing Discursive Resources: How Students Use Prior Genre Knowledge to Negotiate New Writing Contexts in First-Year Composition.” Written Communication. 28.3. 2011. Web. • Roberston, Liane, Kara Taczak, and Kathleen Blake Yancey. “Notes toward a Theory of Prior Knowledge and Its Role in College Composers’ Transfer of Knowledge and Practice.” Composition Forum. 26. Fall 2012. Web. • Rounsaville, Angela, Rachel Goldberg, and AnisBawarshi. “From Incomes to Outcomes: FYW Students’ Prior Genre Knowledge, Meta-Cognition, and the Question of Transfer.” WPA. 32.1. Fall/Winter 2008. Web. • Yancey, Kathleen Blake. Reflection in the Writing Classroom. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press, 1998. Print.

More Related