1 / 17

Implementation of Connection Network Codes The French process

Implementation of Connection Network Codes The French process. Energy Community /ENTSOE external Workshop Vienna 25.02.2016. Stéphanie Bieth – RTE French TSO. Topics. Organisation and schedule Impact on the national documents Roles of the involved parties. Topics.

bjennie
Download Presentation

Implementation of Connection Network Codes The French process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implementation of Connection Network Codes The French process Energy Community /ENTSOE external Workshop Vienna 25.02.2016 Stéphanie Bieth – RTE French TSO

  2. Topics • Organisation and schedule • Impact on the national documents • Roles of the involved parties

  3. Topics • Organisation and schedule • Impact on the national documents • Roles of the involved parties

  4. Launch of the national implementation of connectionNetwork Codes A « pilot working group » was put in place in October 2014 by the Ministry, in cooperation with the French Regulator (CRE), in order : • To assess the impact of RfG on the existing texts governing the connection of generators to the grid • To list the subjects that have to be discussed with stakeholders and identify their importance for the stakeholders • To define in which framework the consultation should take place. A report was presented to the Ministry and the Regulator in March 2015. Organization and schedule

  5. A specificcommittee for discussion and proposals The report concludedthata specificcommitteeshouldbe put in place to discuss and makeproposals on the implementation of RfG on a national level. This committeeonlyaddresses the implementation of RfG. It started in July 2015. Feedback on thisexperienceshouldenable us to decide on the process for following codes. Theseprinciplesshouldbe consistent. A committee on DCC implementationwas put in place in December 2015 A third one on NC HVDC isexpected in March 2016 Organization and schedule

  6. Keyprinciples The committee makes proposals on non-exhaustive and non mandatory requirements as well as proposals on methodologies identified by the « pilot working group ». Based on these proposals, it will then be up to the Ministry and/or the Regulator to decide on these requirements and methodologies. Organization and schedule

  7. Implementationschedule March 2018 Implementation ends March 2019 applicability March 2016? Entry into Force Sept. 2016 T0: ECBC vote Dec. 2016 March 2017 26/06/15 3 Sept. 2018: Declaration of existing facilities 2 regulatoryframework modifications Technicalrequirements 1 Choice of type B, C, D thresholds A B C D Grid codes modifications (TSO and DSOs) 4 Some of the elements of step 3 and 4 can start before the end of step 2 and 2’ 2’ Operationnal notifications and Complianceprocess Zoom 5 CostBenefitAnalysis Derogations 6 7 Application to existingfacilities Organization and schedule

  8. Implementationschedule -Zoom March 2017 Dec 2016 March 2016 2 • Types B,C,D • FRT capability (SPGM, PPM) • fastfaultcurrent injection PPM • Reconnectionafterfault • Control and protections • Informations exchanges • Active power recovery (SPGM, PPM) • Types C,D • LFSM-U • FSM • Reactive power capability (PQ diagram ) • Voltage control (PPM) • P control • Tripping to houseload, black-start, islandoperation • Instrumentation, models • Ramps • Syntheticinertia PPM • Types D • FRTvoltage ranges • Voltage control • Synchronization • Automaticdisconnection • Types A,B,C,D • Time period in the frequency ranges • ROCOF threshold • LFSM-O • Admissible active power reduction • Type A • Logic interface • Automaticreconnection • Offshore • UQ DiagramatPmax • Voltage ranges • Type B • reactive power capability • Logic interface for P control Operationnal Notification Type A 2’ Operationnal Notification + Complianceprocess B,C Operationnal Notification + complianceprocess Type D et offshore Organization and schedule

  9. Topics • Organisation and schedule • Impact on the national documents • Roles of the involved parties

  10. Existing framework concerning technical requirements for connection Directive 2009/72/CE European Law Energy Code National Law Regulatory Framework General provisions on technical requirements for connection and their scopes Decrees Detailed requirements such as reactive power requirements, FRT capability, compliance monitoring, etc. are defined by Orders NRA Decisions on connection procedures Arrêtés (Orders) SOs describe the regulatory, technical and contractual conditions to connect facilities to their network. They may also specify technical solutions allowing compliance with the regulatory aspects TSO and DSOsGrid Codes Impacton the national documents

  11. Impact of the RfG NC on Decree Decree • Today, France has one Decree related to the connection of generators. • This decree must be revised. For the sake of clarity, an option under discussion is to keep one “all-encompassing Decree”. • Option under discussion  A “all-encompassing Decree” which could : • Include the existing provisions still applicable and take into account new provisions from the RfG Network Code. • Define which national authority is competent to approve, when needed, requirements from the RfG NC and create the link between provisions which will be defined in Orders, NRA Decisions and Grid Codes. Impacton the national documents

  12. Impact of the RfG NC on Orders and Grid Codes Arrêtés (Orders) • Today, France has Orders defining the technical requirements and compliance monitoring measures per voltage level • A deep revision will be needed in order to take into account the new provisions from the RfG Network Code (Yet to be determined during Implementation Committee) TSO and DSOsGrid Codes • System Operators Grid Codes bringing together a large number of regulatory, technical and contract conditions will be strongly impacted • A deep revision should be conducted by each System Operator • The Grid Codes should gather RfG NC and national regulations provisions in order to inform customers of all applicable provisions. Impacton the national documents

  13. Topics • Organisation and schedule • Impact on the national documents • Roles of the involved parties

  14. The Involved Parties • Stakeholders : generators, associations of generators, manufacturers • Network operators: the DSOs association, RTE • the French Energy Ministry and the Regulator. All are involved through the specific Implementation Committee Roles of the involved parties

  15. The ImplementationCommittee Decision and Validation Authorities (NRA / French Ministry) Implementation Committee (Convenors: RTE / DSOs Association) Ad-hoc working groups Transmission specific issues Distribution specific issues Common issues Proposals of changes in the regulatoryframework Or Principles to include in the network operatorgrid codes Roles of the involved parties

  16. How does the commiteework? Topic identified by the Implementation Committee or ad hoc WG Stakeholderswrittenproposals, comments, analysis Discussions Proposal (s) Whenapplicable NO Consultation (art.10) Written position of the Stakeholders on each proposal CONSENSUS YES Report of the consultation Report of the consultation Final Proposal Proposal & consultation report Report validation by the Implementation Committee or the ad hoc WG Ministry or NRA approval Ministry or NRA approval Decision to send the report Formal decision from Ministry or NRA NO YES Roles of the involved parties

  17. Thankyou for your attention!

More Related