1 / 23

Meeting the Business Engagement Challenge

Meeting the Business Engagement Challenge. Prof Graham Henderson CBE Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive 01 November 2011. Our Mission…. Providing Opportunities, Driving Enterprise , Delivering Excellence

braden
Download Presentation

Meeting the Business Engagement Challenge

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Meeting the Business Engagement Challenge Prof Graham Henderson CBE Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive 01 November 2011

  2. Our Mission….. Providing Opportunities, Driving Enterprise, Delivering Excellence Working in partnership to enable individuals & organisations to achieve their potential through high quality learning, research & knowledge transfer ….. to achieve regional, national & international recognition as the UK’s leading University for working with business…..

  3. Our Strategic Aim(and motivation for our SDF bid) To build on our earlier progress to become a leading business-facing university ...by behaving more like a business

  4. Not just a project… more a way of life £5.13m grant for ‘Building the Future’ to deliver: • New employer partners; • New employer-based students; • Programmes & services tailored to employer needs; and , most importantly… • A sustainable infrastructure; and • A permanent, institution-wide culture change

  5. Our core philosophy • Putting employers at the heart of activity through ‘an integrated business approach’ embracing: • Workforce development • Knowledge Transfer; and • Enterprise … all aligned & delivered as one business service

  6. So, what did we put in place… • Established Business Engagement as a priority • Flipped University inside-out with more business facing people • Established a ‘Hub and spoke’ model involving: • A strong central team • Strong central coordination & leadership • Senior managers in every school • A devolved ‘Business Account Manager’ team • A University-wide CRM system

  7. So, what did we put in place… (continued) • A ‘team’ of Business Account Managers(devolved but centrally coordinated) charged with developing the employer market in their specific sectors & working collectively to maximise sharing of opportunities and good practice • An Employer Quality Manager with a specific focus on developing a customer service approach

  8. So, what did we put in place… (continued) • A Customer Relationship Management System which required massive changes in mindset, to facilitate sharing information & contacts – a major piece of work requiring ongoing training & support for 3 years and counting... • A ‘Development Fund’ for new initiatives to support academic colleagues developing new employer-led activity by either buying out their time or buying in support

  9. So, what did we put in place… (continued) • Theme-based task groups (HR, processes, etc) University-wide groupings of School & support staff addressing necessary changes in HR, quality processes, contracting, marketing/PR, physical environment, etc • Support groups and networks Monthly meetings to support Schools in delivery of their workforce development (WfD) programmes

  10. So, what did we put in place… (continued) • An employer engagement model based on a ‘business solutions’ approach Involving working with employers to diagnose needs & propose appropriate solutions from a wide portfolio of possible interventions • An extensive staff development programme Aimed at increasing staff confidence to engage in varous aspects of the business engagement spectrum

  11. So, what did we put in place… (continued) • Flexible, more responsive approval & review processes designed to better reflect the responsive needs of workforce development and (both accredited and non-accredited) employer based training • New academic workloading procedures to facilitate the release of time for bus. engagement

  12. And we took the view that…. if you’re going to do it you have to do it well… &‘behave’ like a business!! • Professional ‘business like’ interface • Client focussed, flexible and responsive • Accessible & not overly disruptive • Delivering what you say you’ll deliver • Delivering ‘bottom line value added’ • Long term partnership & relationship building(not just transactional) Prof Graham Henderson

  13. And we further developed our ‘can-do’ approach by: • Enhancing our understanding of markets & market changes • Using intermediaries to reach SME market • Putting in place the processes necessary to achieve: ‘Putting the Customer First’ accreditation

  14. Pursuing deep, proactive engagement with regional/national stakeholder bodies/intermediaries(NECC, CBI, IoD, Business Link, LEP, SHA, TVEP, NSAPI, NEPIC, NCSL, SSCs,…) …. making ourselves (& our offer) central to everything that happens in the sub-region • Establishment of School Business Advisory Boards • Hosting and sponsoring major business events

  15. Strategies for Embedding change • Explicit reflection in Univ. Mission, Vision & Plans • Reinforcement in staff recruitment processes • Bus. Engagement Strategy - 1 of 3 Primary Uni Strategies • Strong & consistent commitment/leadership from the top • Senior mgmt opps. & career progression structures • Strong internal governance and support structures • Creation of a Bus. engagement ‘community’ to provide peer support and share best practice

  16. Progress with Embedding change • Main processes/systems now fully developed & in place • Restructuring concluded to ensure ‘Key’ posts are now consolidated into ‘core University staff model’ • Bus. Engagement ‘Mentors’ identified – a network of staff with bus. experience to support/develop colleagues • Attainment of Putting the Customer First Accred’n (Jan 2010) • CRM system now providing vital market information, & being used for all bus. engagement

  17. Is it working? • Now working with 60+ employers p.a. on WfD (both public and private sector) • Strong focus on accreditation of programmes • Excellent ‘multi-touch’ relationships developed(e.g. KTPs, internships/placements, consultancy, bespoke training/CPD, involvement in curric. dev. etc) • Research and publications e.g. Handbook for the Work-based Learner by Palgrave, edited by Dr Ruth Helyer & featuring work from 5 TU staff (1st full-length book of its kind)

  18. The numbers • 1745 cumulative fte • 6410 total headcount • 15% of HEFCE’s total employer-based nos. in 2009/10 • 6 account managers • 300+ CRMS users (University wide)

  19. Some of the challenges • Negative effect of the economic downturn! • Adapting Internal processes (previously geared to needs of FT on-campus students) • Staff buy-in (still doesn’t involve everyone – but doesn’t need to) • Costing and pricing (developing new processes for work-based programmes) • Removal of co-funding - will be a real challenge in NE (Working to develop alternative models & non-accredited provision to enable us to offer employers viable HLS progs)

  20. Looking ahead • More important now than ever for HEIs to be working effectively with employers • Bus. engagement to become increasingly integrated with other activitiesLinks to ‘employability agenda’ & applied R&D are critical • Will seek to build on achievements of SDF to grow sustainable business relationships • Challenge: to remain flexible/responsive to market need

  21. Thanks for listening Hope that was of some interest Enjoy the conference

More Related