1 / 32

AP TIP IN FALL CONFERENCE 2013

AP TIP IN FALL CONFERENCE 2013. MOCK READING Darrin Pollock & Lauren Peterson . Holistic Scoring. score is based on what the essay does well s coring does NOT mean simply counting “errors”

bree
Download Presentation

AP TIP IN FALL CONFERENCE 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AP TIP IN FALL CONFERENCE 2013 MOCK READING Darrin Pollock & Lauren Peterson

  2. Holistic Scoring • score is based on what the essay does well • scoring does NOT mean simply counting “errors” • each essay topic has its own scoring rubric (or guide) generally based on that topic's specific information • scoring guides encompass four essential criteria: • focus • organization • development • correct and sophisticated language conventions

  3. A Guide to Holistic Scoring

  4. Examining the Prompt 2012 Rhetorical Analysis

  5. Examining the Prompt • Is there a specific question to address or an approach to take when answering the prompt? • What knowledge and skills must a student possess to respond articulately and effectively to the prompt? • What concerns surface when reading the prompt question and text? • What devices & ideas do you recognize as a reader?

  6. Rhetorical Analysis Prompt, 2012

  7. Understanding Guidelines, Scores and Rationales

  8. 2012 Rubric/Scoring Guidlines • Identify key words associated with each score. • Note how the words change with score • Note the * at the bottom of the scoring guide.

  9. Calibrating with a 5 • Completes the essay task, but with no special insights. • The analysis lacks depth and merely states the obvious. • Ideas are predictable and the paragraph development weak. • Ideas presented simplistically and often contain lapses in diction or syntax. • Demonstrate uneven or insufficient understanding of how rhetorical strategies create an author's point. • Writer merely lists what he or she observes in the passage instead of analyzing effect.

  10. CALIBRATION: Sample V • After reading, discuss how the student’s response accurately demonstrates a 5 paper.

  11. Practice Part 1 RECOGNIZING THE UPPER ½  ODD SCORES

  12. CALIBRATION: • A • XXX

  13. CALIBRATION: • A 7 • XXX 9

  14. Practice Part 1 RECOGNIZING THE UPPER ½  EVEN SCORES

  15. CALIBRATION: • R • W

  16. CALIBRATION: • R 6 • W 8

  17. Practice Part 2 RECOGNIZING THE LOWER ½

  18. CALIBRATION: Sample V • Remember to recalibrate and review the 5 sample essay

  19. CALIBRATION: • D • MM

  20. CALIBRATION: • D 3 • MM 1

  21. Practice Part 2 RECOGNIZING THE LOWER ½  EVEN SCORES

  22. CALIBRATION: • M • H

  23. CALIBRATION: • M 4 • H2

  24. PRACTICE MOCK SCORING

  25. CALIBRATION: Sample V, Anchor 5 • Remember to recalibrate and review the 5 sample essay

  26. SCORE:30 minutes • NN • AA • L • PP

  27. Discuss:10 minutes • What scores did you give each essay? Why?

  28. SCORE:30 minutes • NN4 • AA8 • L6 • PP5

  29. Recalibrate Essay V, score 5

  30. Pull Samples: • Y • KK • O

  31. Pull Samples: • Y 5 (low) • KK 3 (high) • O 7 (low)

More Related