1 / 15

The Effectiveness of Industrial Air Pollution Control Policy

The Effectiveness of Industrial Air Pollution Control Policy. A Comparative Study of Jakarta, Indonesia and New South Wales, Australia. Cecep Aminudin Indonesian Center for Environmental Law & Program Study of Environmental Science, University of Indonesia. University of Indonesia.

bruce-roberson
Download Presentation

The Effectiveness of Industrial Air Pollution Control Policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Effectiveness ofIndustrial Air Pollution Control Policy A Comparative Study of Jakarta, Indonesia and New South Wales, Australia Cecep Aminudin Indonesian Center for Environmental Law & Program Study of Environmental Science, University of Indonesia University of Indonesia

  2. Background • Air quality is very important for human, animal and plant life • Air pollution from various sources (including industry) is an acute problem in the world • Governments issued policy to solve the problem • However, the research about the effectiveness of the air pollution control policy is still rare

  3. Research Objectives • To know the effectiveness of industrial air pollution control policy in Jakarta, Indonesia • To know the effectiveness of industrial air pollution control policy in New South Wales, Australia • To compare the effectiveness of industrial air pollution control policy in Jakarta, Indonesia and New South Wales, Australia

  4. The Framework of Industrial Air Pollution Control Policy in Jakarta, Indonesia Indonesia 1945 Constitution Law Number 23/1997 on Environmental Management Act Government Regulation 41/1999 on Air Pollution Control Blue Sky Program PROPER Program MoE Decrees on Emission Standard National Local Regulation 2/2005 on Air Pollution Control Governor Decree on Ambient Air Standard Local (Jakarta) Governor Decree on Emission Standard Clean Air Program Air Emission License Air Pollution Emitters Industry

  5. The Framework of Industrial Air Pollution Control Policy in NSW, Australia Australian Constitution and Legal System, Common Law IGAE NEPMs NPI National Ambient Air Quality Federal States (NSW) Protection of the Environment Operation Act 1997 (POEO) Protection of the Environment Operation (Clean Air) Regulation NSW AQMP (Action for Air) NOx Policy Pollution reduction program Leak detection & repair Implement POEO Act Cleaner Production Unit in EPA Implement Clean Air Regulation Load Based Licensing Air Pollution Emitters Industry

  6. The Comparison of Policy Instruments in Jakarta and NSW

  7. Measuring Effectiveness • Administrative Law Enforcement • Private Law Enforcement • Criminal Law Enforcement • Market Based Instruments • Publication and Information Instruments • Voluntary Instruments • Public Expenditure Instruments Industry behaviors to the regulation Emission load and concentration from industrial sources Air Quality in Industrial Area

  8. Research and Analysis Method

  9. The conditions of the policy outputs Administrative Enforcement Criminal Enforcement Voluntary Private Enforcement Information & Publication Public Expenditure Economic Instrument

  10. The Conditions of the Policy Intermediate Outcomes Jakarta: Reactive phase. The behavior of industry to comply with environmental regulation are low. Non compliance to emission standard between 17 – 76 %, non compliance on reporting obligation is about 30 %, the installation of air pollution equipment 0 out of 10 in 2004. NSW: Constructive to Proactive Phase. Non-compliance rate of industry is relatively low (12 – 15 %). the installation of air pollution equipment 17 out of 17 in 2000.

  11. The Conditions of Policy End Outcomes Nitrogen Oxide Jakarta NSW Particulate Hydrocarbon Sulfur Dioxide Carbon Monoxide

  12. Conclusion 1. In general, the industrial air pollution control policy in Jakarta is not yet effective. Where the end policy outcomes, the intermediate policy outcomes are low and policy output is weak. • In general, the industrial air policy control policy in NSW is potential to be effective. Where the end policy outcomes and the intermediate policy outcomes are better than in Jakarta and the policy outputs is stronger than in Jakarta. • The industrial air pollution control policy in NSW is more effective than in Jakarta.

  13. Why There is a gap ? Lack of institutional capacity, strategy, political priority, and enforcement culture in Indonesia.

  14. Recommendations Central Government Donors Law Enforcers Local Government Financial Institutions Industries NGO’s & Civil Society Markets A concerted efforts of stakeholders ………………….

  15. Thank you……..... INDONESIAN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LAW JL. Dempo II No. 21, Kebayoran Baru, Jakarta, 12120. INDONESIA email: aminudin98@yahoo.com

More Related