1 / 40

Evaluation and promotion CDR 2010 Information meeting

Evaluation and promotion CDR 2010 Information meeting. Renouveau & Démocratie your trade union informs you!. Appeal procedure amended during ongoing exercice! What‘s new for you?. Structure. What remains? What‘s new? Procedure Promotion Appeals. What remains?.

cara-wade
Download Presentation

Evaluation and promotion CDR 2010 Information meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluation and promotionCDR 2010Information meeting Renouveau & Démocratie your trade union informs you! R&D CDR Information meeting

  2. Appeal procedure amended during ongoing exercice!What‘s new for you? R&D CDR Information meeting

  3. Structure • What remains? What‘s new? • Procedure • Promotion • Appeals R&D CDR Information meeting

  4. What remains? • Fixed promotion thresholds in most grades • Scale 0-12 ‚promotion points‘ • 4 performance levels (in reality 5) • Percentage quotas for 2 ‚highflyer‘ merit groups • IA (10-12 promo points) • IB (7-9 promo points) • 8%+22% = 30% R&D CDR Information meeting

  5. PROCEDURE R&D CDR Information meeting

  6. Self assessment • Check out the new evaluation standards • these will be used by your hierarchy • Useful reference to get a ‚feeling‘ for the text of your evaluation • Check the criteria for points attribution • Re-read your objectives • Keep it short and simple (although there is no formal limit!) R&D CDR Information meeting

  7. Dialogue with Head of Unit • Indication of Performance Level (no points) during dialogue (new) • Your Head of Unit proposes promotion points to the director • When your rucksack is getting close to threshold make sure your hierarchy is aware of it early on. Your hierarchy might have to defend your case at central DG level!!!! R&D CDR Information meeting

  8. Your Evaluation Report • Assessed are • Efficiency • Ability • Conduct in the service • Attention: no more weighings in terms of points for the 3 criteria R&D CDR Information meeting

  9. Project Evaluation Report After the dialogue SysPer sends you invitation to • ‚Accept‘ the draft evaluation report • Insert comments to the countersigning officer • Whatever you do at this stage, it does not prevent you to launch an appeal once you receive the final report with info on merit group and promotion points Attention: you cannot yet judge the „real“ value of your assessment at this stage!! R&D CDR Information meeting

  10. Criteria for performance level • The jobholder's performance • IA constantly exceeded • IB frequently exceeded • II fully met • III partly met • IV failed to meet expectations Attention: Watch out for wording in your report!! R&D CDR Information meeting

  11. Criteria for points attribution within a given performance level • Evaluation Report (‚merit‘) • Foreign languages used in the service • Responsibility • Especially in higher grades: „double advantage“ HoU, deputy HoU,head of sector, etc. • But also recognition of special tasks • Activity in the interest of the institution (jury, concours papers, joint committees) R&D CDR Information meeting

  12. PROMOTION R&D CDR Information meeting

  13. Thresholds • 3 years‘ career = 18 points (3x6) • 4 years‘ career = 24 points (4x6) • 5 years‘ career = 30 points (5x6) • Transition until 2011 in some grades with predictable but still changing thresholds (Convergence Plan) • Statutory transition for „end of career“ grades AD12-AST10-AST6/C-AST4/D R&D CDR Information meeting

  14. Convergence Plan until 2011 R&D CDR Information meeting

  15. End-of-career grades before 2004 Promotion percentages 2010 Annex XIII Staff Regulation • AD12: • 2010: 20% (instead of 15% 2009) • 2011: 25% (fix from then on) • AST10: 2010: 20% and stable • AST6.C: 2010: 20% and stable • AST4.D: 2010: 10% and stable • R&D advise: this does not yet translate into stable thresholds!!! R&D CDR Information meeting

  16. End-of-career grades before 2004 2010 provisional promotion thresholds: • AD12: 45 PP in your rucksack • AST10: 53 PP in your rucksack • AST6.C: 41 PP in your rucksack • AST4.D: 54 PP in your rucksack • R&D advice: these thresholds can still move in both directions: fixed by the Promotion Committees only at the end of the exercise!!! R&D CDR Information meeting

  17. End-of-career grades before 2004 • AD12: 45 PP in your rucksack • AST10: 53 PP in your rucksack • AST6.C: 41 PP in your rucksack • AST4.D: 54 PP in your rucksack • R&D advice: if your DG puts you exactly at these thresholds (without safety margin), you are well advised to introduce an appeal ‘just in case’ R&D CDR Information meeting

  18. The promotion cycle • Mobility between performance levels • Mobility between points within performance levels • 30% of officials in PL IA and IB • Rapid promotions from 2y possible • Performance levels III and IV: DG loses points – very rare R&D CDR Information meeting

  19. The so-called „political commitment“ for statutory promotion speeds • Commissioner Kallas’ “commitment” • % of officials to be promoted in 3-4-5 years (or faster) each year: • Base grades: 80%. • Middle grades: 75%. • Advanced grades: 70% • This includes the 30% highflyer quota • Number of caveats (budget!) R&D are observing statistics! R&D CDR Information meeting

  20. APPEALS R&D CDR Information meeting

  21. Appeal procedure : new rules during ongoing exercise! • Despite unanimous refusal by staff reps: • GIP Art 43 and 45 have been changed • Only as regards appeals‘ procedure! • While other CDR elements remain the same as in 2009 (which were different from 2008 and before….) • Consequence: Colleagues‘ rights to a useful appeal are seriously curtailed by the DGs‘ wish not to repeat the 2009 exercise with 4000 appeals R&D CDR Information meeting

  22. Appeal procedure2009 results • 5000 promotions • 4000 appeals!!! (An absolute record in the history of the institution) • Most appeals in Performance Level II (esp 4-5 points for normal performers‘) • 23% success rate of appeals • Nightmare procedure for everybody! R&D CDR Information meeting

  23. Appeal procedure 2010 • As of 12 May most reports become available via SysPer2 (new) • Report – performance level – points • As of the date of SysPer accessibility the appeals‘ deadline (15 days) starts R&D CDR Information meeting

  24. Appeal procedure • If you are unhappy with your report • If you find yourself in the wrong performance level • If you are unhappy with your points • If you get ‚automatically‘ promoted in 2010 and your DG tries to ‚save points‘ on you • If 2009 promises have not been kept You can file an appeal with the Joint Promotion and Evalutaion Committee (which includes staff reps and R&D members) R&D CDR Information meeting

  25. Appeal procedure Various options: you may • accept the report, with or without comments = report closed • Reject the report and file an appeal • Accept the promotion points awarded • Appeal against the number of points inside the performance level and file an appeal • Do nothing: HHR will close your CDR R&D CDR Information meeting

  26. Appeal procedurehelp to formulate your appeal • Keep it short and concise • Make clear what you appeal against • R&D has prepared templates for the most typical appeals‘ reasonsin EN and FR to be found on our website www.renouveau-democratie.eu R&D CDR Information meeting

  27. Appeal:and if I change my mind? • You can withdraw your appeal at any stage of the appeal procedure in SysPer2 (new) • The Joint Committee will be informed of every appeal filed R&D CDR Information meeting

  28. Appeal procedure - deadlines • 15 working days (new) • Strict application of deadline: • Automatic closure by HR unit if you don‘t react in time (new) • Justified absences still prolongue (missions – sickness - leave) • 2nd dialogue does not prolongue deadline for appeal (new) R&D CDR Information meeting

  29. Appeal procedure - deadlines • 12+3 days deadline if you demand ‚information meeting‘ with CO (which in many cases will be delegated to RO) • R&D recommendation: • CDR can be re-opened by HR unit upon demand of your superior • In case of justified absences beyond the 15 working days‘ limit • In case of particular circumstances R&D CDR Information meeting

  30. Appeal procedure ATTENTION SysPer2 traps: • If you sign the text of your report • You automatically OK your performance level • No more appeal against level possible • Only against points inside Performance Level R&D advise: in case of doubt: contest everything!! R&D CDR Information meeting

  31. 2nd dialogue for appeal – for ‚information‘ only • With countersigning officer • S/he can delegate to evaluator: (new) • you are likely to hold your 2nd dialogue with the same person that drafted your appraisal…. • Only ‚information‘ – no change to text nor points (new) • DGs have no more possibility to correct an erronous report at this stage! (new) • R&D view: these new rules devoid the 2nd dialogue of any useful meaning!!! R&D CDR Information meeting

  32. 2nd dialogue for appeal – for ‚information‘ only • 2nd dialogue is not compulsory for appeal • but job holder can demand it: In that case CO has to organise one within 12 working days (justified absences count!) (new) • Suppression of comments on 2nd dialogue (both ways) (new) • If CO: you may demand presence of your evaluator. • You may ask a colleague to accompany you (for ex a staff rep) R&D CDR Information meeting

  33. Appeal procedure – treatment of appeals Separation of appeals • against report and/or performance level • against points only DGs are trying to limit appeals rendering them as cumbersome as possible!!!! R&D CDR Information meeting

  34. Appeal procedure – treatment of appeals • Against reports and levels:Vertically by ‘families’ of DGs (like last year) by Joint Working Groups • Against points within performance level:Horizontally by grades across all DGs by one or more ‘Joint Central Groups’ (new) • All findings to be submitted to CPEP(Joint Committee Evaluation and Promotion) for final recommendation R&D CDR Information meeting

  35. Appeal procedure – structure of Committees Treatment of appeals • Joint Committee Eval and Promotion (CPEP plenary) • Intermediary Group to prepare CPE • Working groups for appeals against report or Performance Level • Central committee for appeals against points R&D CDR Information meeting

  36. Appeal procedure – structure of Committees Treatment of appeals • President of all committees, working groups, central groups etc (nominated by administration) has pivot vote(new) • President votes only if ADMIN and RP members cannot agree • Therefore staff reps are practically in a minority situation (new) • Minority positions to be reflected in the Committees‘ and Working Groups‘ comments (new) R&D CDR Information meeting

  37. Appeal procedure – treatment of appeals • Final decision is always taken by the ‘AIPN’ in his/her role as final ‘appeal assessor’ at the end of the work of the Joint Committees and Working Groups • For reports and performance level:this is your own Director General (some don’t follow) • For points:the Director General DG HR (who usually follows Committees’ recommendations) R&D CDR Information meeting

  38. Appeal procedure: AIPN / DG final decision • In case of deviation from Committee’s recommendation: motivation required • Information of colleagues about the outcome of their appeal available in SysPer2 at the end of the 2010 promotion exercise (November at the latest) R&D CDR Information meeting

  39. 2011: What‘s ahead? • After 8 CDR exercises and ‚reforming‘ rules every year • Staff and hierarchy demotivation at a peak • New eval/promo system 2011 in the pipeline • No information to staff reps yet • ‚Concertation‘ procedure / social dialogue (consultation/negotiation) to start soon R&Ddemands that those talks be opened without further delay! R&D CDR Information meeting

  40. R&D Information meetingCDR 2010 - appeals R&Dis at your disposalDo not hesistate to contact us!  55676 Appeals’ templates available online www.renouveau-democratie.eu R&D CDR Information meeting

More Related