1 / 6

Urban Social Safety Net Program Theory of Change

Monitoring & Evaluating an Urban Social Safety Net Program by Group 1 Tomáš,Tomáš, Andrej, Rebekka, Katka, Helena. Urban Social Safety Net Program Theory of Change. Neighborhood com. (NC). Money: Central gvt transfer & local gvt taxes. Staff. Inputs:. Administration system for

carson
Download Presentation

Urban Social Safety Net Program Theory of Change

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Monitoring & Evaluating an Urban Social Safety Net Programby Group 1Tomáš,Tomáš, Andrej, Rebekka, Katka, Helena

  2. Urban Social Safety Net ProgramTheory of Change Neighborhood com. (NC) Money: Central gvt transfer & local gvt taxes Staff Inputs: Administration system for add. assistance Means testing by NC Select eligible beneficiaries Distribution channels Determine Threshold Activities: Health & Medical assistance, education subsidy, reduced utility costs People gets stipend up to local standard Back-to-work incentive Outputs: Use of social services&utilities by poorest Decreased Unemployment Economic situation of families is stabilized Outcomes: Reducing the poverty in the urban areas

  3. Assumptions - Enough financial resources - Existing Legal Framework - Political Stability (local and central gvt) - Effective and trusted Neighborhood committee - Right Team and Methodology for determining local threshold - Administration of additional assistance is transparent - Existence of infrastructure/capacities (health centers/education) - Sufficient labor market demand - People use the money wisely - Money can solve their problems

  4. Program Timeline NOW Mid-term evaluation based on case studies 1st pilot National policy ???? X X X X X 1998 2004 2005 2007 2008

  5. Lessons learned • Some questions which seemed to be relevant at the beginning of the process happen to be irrelevant once thoroughly analyzed.

More Related