1 / 26

Product-driven supply chain selection using AHP

Product-driven supply chain selection using AHP. 937806 林伯鴻. Reference. Wang Ge., R., Huang S.H., Dismukes J.P., 2004. “product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology,” International Journal of Production Economics vol.91, pp1-15

ceallach
Download Presentation

Product-driven supply chain selection using AHP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Product-driven supply chain selection using AHP 937806 林伯鴻

  2. Reference • Wang Ge., R., Huang S.H., Dismukes J.P., 2004. “product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology,” International Journal of Production Economics vol.91, pp1-15 • Korpela, J., Lehmusvaara. A., Tuominen, M., 2001.”Customer service based design of the supply chain”, International journal of production economics, vol.69, pp193-204 • Ramanathan. R., Ganesh,L.S.,1995. “Using AHP for resource allocation problems,” European Journal of Operation Research vol. 80 pp 410-417 • Satty, T.L.,1980, The analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill

  3. Agenda • Introduction of AHP • Product characteristics and supply chain strategy • Problem definition and SCOR model • Solution methodology • Illustrative example • Conclusion

  4. Introduction of AHP(1/2) • AHP (Analytic Hierarchical Process) 分析層級程序法 (AHP) 是Thomas, L. Saaty 在l971 年發展出的一種多屬性決策方法,能支援個人或群體的決策。分析層級程序法主要是用來協助群體決策的制定,是最常用來協助決策者找出最佳策略方案的工具,例如,資訊系統的評估與選擇,旅遊方案的選擇,資源分配的問題及供應鏈中供應商的選擇。 • AHP的執行步驟可分成三階段: 1.建立各項因素的階層架構 2.由決策者與專家填表以主觀決定相關因素的權重 3.計算出最佳的結果與建議

  5. Introduction of AHP(2/2) • AHP與ANP (Analytic Network Process)的差別 分析網路程序法(ANP)於1996年由Saaty所提出,此方法藉由早期之分析階層程序法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)所衍生而來並加以結合網路系統型態所呈現。主要優勢乃是將分析階層程序法結合一回饋(feedback)之機制而加以闡述及發展之。 過去AHP所求出的是主觀的量化結果,忽略對於準則及方案之間的相互回饋之關係特性,因此運用ANP法來所得之量化結果,可提通作為群體決策及評估結果更具理論及實用基礎之信賴度。其ANP法目前應用的範圍大多在解決研發方案之選擇、資訊系統方案選擇等方面的問題。

  6. Product characteristics and supply chain strategy • Generally, product can be categorized into three types : • Functional product: accurately forecasted, market share fairly constant, enjoy a long life cycle • Innovative product: new developed product, more adapted to the customer requirements • Hybrid product mix of functional and innovative product

  7. Product characteristics and supply chain strategy • Typically, supply chain can be classified into three categories : • Lean supply chain (LSC) focus on elimination of waste, reduction of set-up times, small quantities, achieving cost reduction, flexibility, customer requirements • Agile supply chain (ASC) focus on achieving a speedier delivery and lead time flexibility • Hybrid supply chain (HSC) focus on “assemble to order”, achieving mass customization by postponing product differentiation

  8. Product characteristics and supply chain strategy • Supply chain classification based on product type and product life cycle

  9. Problem definition and SCOR model • Problem definition • Company A produce m products. • For each products pi (i=1,2,…,m), it may consists nicomponents, which need to be outsourced. • For each outsource component cij (j=1,2…ni), there are kijpotential supplier to choose from. • Each supplier Sijx (x=1,2,…,kij) has a known production capacity Rijx. • According to the production plan, company A will purchase Tij units of components cij form one or more suppliers

  10. Problem definition and SCOR model • Supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model • Supply Chain Council (SCC) constructed a descriptive framework called SCOR (SCC, 1999) • SCOR is a standard supply chain process reference model designed to embrace all industrials. • The SCOR model endorses 12 performance metrics, which fall into four defining categories: • Delivery reliability • Delivery performance (DR1) • Fill rate (DR2) • Order fulfillment lead time (DR3) • Perfect order fulfillment (DR4)

  11. Problem definition and SCOR model • Flexibility and responsiveness • Supply chain response time (FR1) • Production flexibility (FR2) • Cost • Total logistics management cost (CT1) • Value-added productivity (CT2) • Warranty cost or returns processing cost (CT3) • Assets • Cash-to-cash cycle time (AT1) • Inventory days of supply (AT2) • Asset turns (AT3)

  12. Solution methodology • The developed methodology • To choose most favorable suppliers through qualitative method (AHP) • To order various quantities through quantitative method (preemptive goal programming)

  13. Solution methodology • An integrated AHP-PGP algorithm for supplier selection

  14. Solution methodology • Step1 : Define decision variables for goal programming • Qx : purchasing quantity form supplier x • Ef : Amount of over-achievement for goal f • Uf : Amount of underachievement for goal f Where • X : supplier index, x=1,2,3,…,kij • f : goal (priority) index, f=1,2,3,….,F • Step2 : Define the parameters • Tij : customer demand for component j of product i • TVP : total value of purchase • TCP : total cost of purchase • Dx : unit purchasing cost of supplier x • Rx : production capacity of supplier x • F : number of goals (priorities) • Kij: total number of potential alternatives for component j of product i • Wx: AHP weight for supplier x

  15. Solution methodology • Step3 : State the constraints • Step4 : Determine the preemptive priorities incorporating AHP weights • Priority 1. Maximize the TVP, • Priority 2. Minimize the total cost of purchase

  16. Solution methodology • Step5 : Determine the detrimental deviation • P1 : U1 • P2 : E2 • Step6 : State the priority objectives • P1 : min U1 ………(6) • P2 : min E2 ………(7) • Step7 : Find the optimal solution • By using commercial software tool for goal programming, such as WinQSB, Lingo, the optimal solution to the goal programming can be obtained.

  17. Illustrative example • GW Inc. is a car manufacturer that can produce various functional components, such as, engine, body, glass components, etc. • Only three components need to be outsourced, i.e. tires, electronics, and peripherals. • Tires : focus on reducing costs, while flexibility and responsiveness are not so important. • Peripherals: focus on rapid changes, while cost is not so important. • Electronics : require mass customization, yet its aggregated demand is stable.

  18. Illustrative example

  19. Illustrative example

  20. Illustrative example • Result

  21. Illustrative example • The decision variables • X=1,2,3 • f=1,2 • F=2 • Kij=3 • The constrains are

  22. Illustrative example • The priorities are as follows • Priority 1. Maximize TVP • Priority 2. Minimize total cost of purchase (TCP) • Optimal solution can be decided : supplier A1 and A3 are chosen with 400 and 600

  23. 補充 • 根據老師上課的指示,要我先去瞭解goal programming並把goal programming轉換成linear programing。 • 轉換過程: • 我有附上Word檔即是詳細的轉換流程,請老師您查閱,謝謝您。

  24. Conclusion • The integrated AHP-PGP methodology can select the best set of multiple suppliers to satisfy capacity constraint. • It can be concluded that LSC strategy should be deployed for component tires, ASC for peripherals and HSC for electronics. • The mathematical results from the AHP model perfectly match the above theoretical analysis.

  25. Conclusion • Which will influence the final quantity? • Since PGP uses AHP ratings as input, the variations of pairwise comparisons in AHP will influence the final order quantity • To make sure that the decision maker (managers) does not make mistakes that cause conflicting rating, a final inconsistency checking (CR<0.1) is applied.

  26. Thanks for your listening!!!

More Related