1 / 28

Distributed mass partons in quark matter Consistent e os with mass distribution

Equation of state for distributed mass quark matter T.S.Bíró , P.Lévai, P.Ván, J.Zimányi KFKI RMKI, Budapest, Hungary. Distributed mass partons in quark matter Consistent e os with mass distribution Fit to lattice eos data Argument s for a mass gap.

chuck
Download Presentation

Distributed mass partons in quark matter Consistent e os with mass distribution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Equationof state for distributed mass quark matterT.S.Bíró, P.Lévai, P.Ván, J.ZimányiKFKI RMKI, Budapest, Hungary • Distributed mass partons in quark matter • Consistent eos with mass distribution • Fit to lattice eos data • Arguments for a mass gap Strange Quark Matter 2006, 27.03.2006. Los Angeles

  2. Why distributed mass? c o a l e s c e n c e : c o n v o l u t i o n valence mass  hadron mass ( half or third…) w(m) w(had-m) w(m) Zimányi, Lévai, Bíró, JPG 31:711,2005 w ( m ) is not constant zero probability for zero mass Conditions:

  3. Previous progress (state of the art…) • valence mass + spin-dependent splitting : • too large perturbations (e.g. pentaquarks) • Hagedorn spectrum (resonances): • no quark matter, • forefactor uncertain • QCD on the lattice: • pion mass is low • resonances survive Tc • quasiparticle mass m ~ gT leads to p / p_SB < 1

  4. Strategies • guess w ( m )  hadronization rates •  eos (check lattice QCD) • 2. Take eos (fit QCD)  find a single w ( m )  rates, spectra o r

  5. Consistent quasiparticle thermodynamics This is still an ideal gas(albeit with an infinite number of components) !

  6. Consistent quasiparticle thermodynamics Integrability (Maxwell relation): • w independent of T and µ  Φ constant • single mass scale M  Φ(M) and ∂ p / ∂ M = 0.

  7. pressure – mass distribution

  8. Adjust M(µ,T) to pressure

  9. f ( t ) = M w( m ) t = m / M

  10. All lattice QCD data from: Aoki, Fodor, Katz, Szabó hep-lat/0510084 T / M (T, 0)

  11. Adjusted M(T) for lattice eos

  12. T and µ-dependence of mass scale M Boltzmann approximation starts to fail

  13. pressure – mass distribution 2

  14. Analytically solvable case

  15. Example for inverse Meijer trf.

  16. eos fits to obtain σ(g)  f(t) • sigma values are in (0,1) • monotonic falling • try exponential of odd powers • try exponential of sinh • study - log derivative numerically • fit exponential times Wood-Saxon (Fermi) form All lattice QCD data from: Aoki, Fodor, Katz, Szabó hep-lat/0510084

  17. exp(-λg) / (1+exp((g-a)/b) ) fit to normalized pressure σ(g) = 1 / g =

  18. MASS GAP: fit exp(λg) * data g =

  19. Fermi eos fit  mass distribution mass gap (threshold behavior)

  20. asymptotics:

  21. zoom

  22. Moments of the mass distribution n = 0 limiting case: 1 = 0 ·  n < 0 all positive mass moments diverge due to 1/m² asymptotics n > 0 inverse mass moments are finite due to MASS GAP

  23. Conclusions • Lattice eos data demand finite width T-independent mass distribution, this is unique • Adjusted < m >(T) behaves like the fixed mass in the quasiparticle model • Strong indication of a mass gap: • best fit to lattice eos: exp · Fermi • SB pressure achieved for large T • all inverse mass moments are finite • - d/dg ln σ(g) has a finite limit at g=0

  24. Interpretation • Does the quark matter interact? • Mass scale vs mean field: * M(T) if and only if Φ(T) * w(m) T-indep.  Φ const. • What about quantum statistics and color confinement? • From what do (strange) hadrons form? • How may the Hagedorn spectrum be reflected in our analysis?

More Related