1 / 40

Presenters: Steven Elliot, Esq. Jennifer Giesen, Esq.

Preparation for a Medicaid Assistive Technology Hearing October 21, 2009 Hilton Garden Inn, Austin, Texas Sponsored by the National AT Advocacy Project, Project of Neighborhood Legal Services, Inc. Advocacy, Inc., Austin, TX. Presenters: Steven Elliot, Esq. Jennifer Giesen, Esq.

clara
Download Presentation

Presenters: Steven Elliot, Esq. Jennifer Giesen, Esq.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Preparation for a Medicaid Assistive Technology HearingOctober 21, 2009Hilton Garden Inn, Austin, TexasSponsored by the National AT Advocacy Project, Project of Neighborhood Legal Services, Inc.Advocacy, Inc., Austin, TX Presenters: Steven Elliot, Esq. Jennifer Giesen, Esq. Advocacy, Inc., Austin, TX Minnesota Disability Law Center Diana Straube, Esq. & James R. Sheldon, Jr., Esq. National AT Advocacy Project, Buffalo, NY

  2. How a DME Case StartsDue Process Notice and Request for Hearing Timely Decision-Making Required • Reasonable promptness requirement. • State agency must “furnish Medicaid promptly without any delay caused by the agency’s administrative procedures.” 42 C.F.R. § 435.930. • For DME, state Medicaid agencies generally use a prior approval process. • States allowed to set time limits for prior approval, but must be reasonable.

  3. Notice of Adverse Decision • Medicaid agency must send out notice to Medicaid recipient whenever the agency takes “action” against the beneficiary. • “Action” – includes “termination, suspension, or reduction of Medicaid eligibility or covered services. 42 C.F.R. § 431.201. • “Action” – may also include an “approval” of service if approved with modifications. Ladd v. Thomas, 962 F.Supp 284 (D. Conn. 1997). • Denial/approval with modification of DME request is an action and requires timely and adequate notice.

  4. Adequacy of the Notice The Medicaid Act, Regulations Require: • Statement of the proposed action. • Reasons for the proposed action. • Specific regulations supporting the action. • Explanation of the person’s right to request a hearing and the type of hearing available to the individual. • Description of circumstances under which Medicaid eligibility or eligibility for a specific service is continued pending the outcome of the hearing. 42 C.F.R. § 435.919

  5. Examples of Defective Notices • “Not medically necessary.” • “Fails to meet prior authorization criteria.” • “Does not meet the criteria of Medicaid’s durable medical equipment regulations.” • Does not state time limit for requesting the hearing (NY caselaw on “tolling” statute of limitations). • Does not explain “how” to request the hearing.

  6. RESEARCH &INVESTIGATION

  7. Research & Investigation Steps • Telephone screening • Client interview • Check written notices, determine deadlines for requesting a hearing • Factual investigation (interview the expert, the vendor, the manufacturer) • Review the Medicaid agency’s file • Medical or disability-related research • Legal research • Gather supporting documentation, including expert reports • Evaluation of case merit

  8. Interviewing Clients and Witnesses • Establish trust • Be a good listener • Take good notes • Build a narrative • Probe for additional information • Help the witness remember by: • setting the scene; • triggering detail; or • using other sources.

  9. Evaluation of Case Merit • Research the legal elements you must prove. • Analyze whether the facts of this case meet the legal elements. • Determine how you will prove those facts. • Determine whether you can dispute the reasons the AT was denied.

  10. Medical Justification Letter – Part I • Introductory sentence • Professional credentials • How you know this patient • Patient’s diagnosis and prognosis • Description of the current device • Explanation of how it is failing to meet patient’s needs.

  11. Medical Justification Letter – Part II • Description of the requested device, including, if necessary, how it meets the DME definition. • Explanation of how the requested device will meet the patient’s medical needs. • If the patient did not need the device before, explanation of why it is needed now. • How this device is the least costly, equally medically effective device.

  12. Medical Justification Letter – Part III Other possible supporting documentation: • Medical articles/journals/studies • Information about DME requested • Food and Drug Administration (FDA) documents • Picture or videos of client using DME

  13. Attempt to Resolve Without a Hearing • Always good strategy • Saves time for client • Saves resources for P&A • Decide whether to request hearing first, then negotiate. • Even if negotiations do not lead to full resolution, you can: • Clarify issues in dispute…avoid wasting time at hearing; • Resolve one or more issues in client’s favor; or • Have opportunity for “free discovery”…to review strengths, weaknesses of agency’s case.

  14. Developing a Theory of Your Case Each hearing could involve one or more of the following elements to establish the right to DME: • Individual must be eligible for Medicaid. • Services or DME sought must be “covered” • For an adult, must be either a required service, or an optional service that state has elected to cover. • For child, service must be among federally required or optional services. • Are services covered by another funding source? • Are services medically necessary? • Are services the least costly alternative that will meet the individual’s needs?

  15. Hearing Logistics • Will the hearing take place in person or by phone? • What is the scheduled length of the hearing? • How will the hearing be recorded?

  16. Location of Hearing • Do hearings take place in the recipient’s home county or at the Medicaid agency? • Are the hearings at the county social services offices? • Do hearings take place in a conference room large enough to accommodate all of your witnesses? • Can the hearing be held at your client’s home?

  17. Know Your Hearing Officer • Are they an employee of the Medicaid agency? • What are their qualifications and background? • What is their record on similar cases? • How do they conduct hearings?

  18. Hearing Procedures • Are pre-hearing disclosures required? • How are subpoenas obtained? • Is the proceeding like a formal court hearing? • Do the rules of evidence apply? • Who has the burden of proof? • What is the role of the Medicaid agency?

  19. Presenting Evidence at Hearing • Documents organized in binders • Witness statements and testimony • Assistive technology as evidence • Actual technology at hearing • Videotape demonstration

  20. Prepare and Deliver an Opening Statement • An oral summary, presented at beginning of hearing. • Gives decision maker a preview of what case is about. Your opportunity to accomplish several things: • Explain who your client is, what the requested equipment will do for him or her. • Explain what is not in dispute. • Clarify the issues which remain in dispute. • Explain your theory of the case. • Explain testimony and documents you will use.

  21. Do You Ever Waive the Opening Statement? • No universal “yes” or “no” • May choose a very simplified form of opening statement • May be appropriate if advocate knows ALJ will not need an elaborate explanation. • A detailed opening is most needed when ALJ is not familiar with the issues, the type of documentary evidence, or applicable law. Remember the goals of the opening. • Tailor your opening to meet these goals.

  22. How Long Should the Opening Be? • It could depend on what you know about the ALJ • An ALJ may have a reputation of not wanting to hear long opening statements. • If so, try to keep it under 5 minutes. • If longer statement needed, be prepared for ALJ who is resistant. • Tailor length to complexity and length of hearing • 20 minutes may be too much for 1 hour hearing with 3 witnesses. • 20 minutes (or longer) may be appropriate for 2 day hearing with 50 exhibits and 13 witnesses.

  23. Should Written Statement be Used in Lieu of or to Supplement Opening Statement? • A multi-media approach – oral opening and written statement – can be very effective • Would rarely waive right to an oral opening statement. • Good written materials allow you to shorten opening statement. • Written opening should be no longer than needed to provide ALJ with: • The theory of your case • How you intend to prove your case

  24. Additional Guidelines for Opening Statements • Do not overstate your case. • Do not promise a witness or document you might not get. • Do not try to paint the agency or representatives as bad guys. • Take the high road. • ALJs are interested in facts, expert evidence and relevant law. Keep your opening to those issues.

  25. Preparing a Witness for Direct Exam • Explain to them how the hearing is run and the roles of the players involved. • Tell them about the questions you plan to ask and the order of your questions. • Prepare the witness for cross exam questions. • Help the witness understand how much information to give in response to a question.

  26. Construction of Direct Examination • Construct your direct exam with your case theory in mind. • Be sure to cover the facts you need to prove your case. • Anticipate the cross exam.

  27. Organize the Direct Exam in a Persuasive and Logical Way • Start by accrediting the witness. • Organize your questions by topic or in chronological order. • Utilize the doctrines of primacy and recency by starting and ending big.

  28. Conduct a Persuasive and Interesting Direct Exam • The witness is the star of direct exam. • Use simple non-leading questions. • Use head notes to signal a change in topic. • Keep a steady pace to your questions and avoid long pauses.

  29. THE EXPERT WITNESS

  30. Direct Examination of the Expert Witness: Organizational Structure • Introduction (identification and relation to the case) • Qualifications • Tender the witness as an expert (if necessary) • Role and overview of basis for opinion • Opinion • Explanation of opinion (educating the decision maker) • Conclusion – end strong!

  31. Using Documents to Support the Expert’s Opinion(some options) • Highlight important sections of the expert’s report. • Use the agency’s notice to differentiate the expert’s opinion with the agency’s opinion. • Use journal articles, professional standards, or consensus statements.

  32. Differentiating the Competing Expert’s Opinions • How are the opinions similar? • How are the opinions different? • What is the rationale for the divergence? • Why is your expert correct?

  33. Cross Examination Pre-hearing Preparation: Part I • Identify the witness. • Qualifications • Relationship to opponent • Get copies of any reports by the witness regarding this case. • Compare the report to the letters of medical justification. • Compare the report to published articles/studies. • Compare the report to law and regulations.

  34. Cross Examination Pre-hearing Preparation: Part II • Review any professional articles the witness may have written. • Decide whether, or how, you can use the witness. • Any points in your favor? • It can be dangerous to cross examine and you may decide not to cross examine at all.

  35. Cross Examination Conduct of Hearing • Listen to witness’s testimony. • Maintain control of the testimony. • Be brief. • Do not ask a question for which you do not know the answer. • Do not argue with the witness. • Know when to stop asking questions.

  36. Prepare and Deliver a Closing Argument When to Do Closing? • Nearly always, but could be extremely short in some cases. Preparation • Prior to hearing, prepare general outline of closing. • Edit outline based on what happens at hearing. • Short hearings (half day or less)…work off outline, with very short notes added. • Longer hearings…plan to edit outline as breaks allow. • If submitting a written argument…closing can be very short.

  37. Prepare Closing Brief or Written Argument Should you submit written arguments? • Great variation in how hearings are run in different states. • Decision should be made on individual circumstances. • Will the written arguments aid the decision maker in deciding the case? • How complex are the medical, technological, and/or legal issues involved?

  38. What are the Goals of Your Written Argument? • Summarize evidence in logical, easy-to-understand fashion. • Lay out law, regulations, and policy so that ALJ can easily follow the arguments. • Discuss evidence on both sides, explain why you prevail. • Summarize strengths, meet weaknesses head on. • Make the job of the ALJ easy.

  39. Deciding What Your Written Arguments Should Look Like • Short letter brief • Longer letter brief, short memorandum of law • As document gets longer (two pages or more), use headings to separate sections. • Your goal – make it easy for ALJ to quickly grasp arguments. • Standard memorandum of law • Proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law

  40. When Does the Written Argument Get Submitted? • Ask for set time, such as two weeks • Briefing schedule, if that is the practice

More Related