1 / 22

2005 ITRS Public Conference PIDS ITWG Emerging Research Devices Munich, Germany April 13, 2005

2005 ITRS Public Conference PIDS ITWG Emerging Research Devices Munich, Germany April 13, 2005. Jim Hutchby – SRC Mike Garner – Intel. ITRS Emerging Research Devices Working Group. George Bourianoff Intel/SRC Joe Brewer U. Florida Toshiro Hiramoto Tokyo U. Jim Hutchby SRC

cleta
Download Presentation

2005 ITRS Public Conference PIDS ITWG Emerging Research Devices Munich, Germany April 13, 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2005 ITRS Public Conference PIDS ITWG Emerging Research Devices Munich, Germany April 13, 2005 Jim Hutchby – SRC Mike Garner – Intel

  2. ITRS Emerging Research Devices Working Group • George Bourianoff Intel/SRC • Joe Brewer U. Florida • Toshiro Hiramoto Tokyo U. • Jim Hutchby SRC • Mike Forshaw UC London • Tsu-Jae King UC Berkeley • Rainer Waser RWTH A • In Yoo Samsung • John Carruthers OGI • Lothar Risch Infineon • Ming-Jinn Tsai ERSO/ITRI • Wei-Tsun Shiau UMC • Peter Zeitzoff ISMT • Rama Muraldihar Freescale • Makoto Yoshimi SOITEC • Kristin De Meyer IMEC • Tak Ning IBM • Philip Wong Stanford U. • Luan Tran Micron • Victor Zhirnov SRC/NCSU • Simon Deleonibus LETI • Thomas Skotnicki ST Me • Yuegang Zhang Intel • Kentaro Shibahara Hiroshima U. • Fred Boeuf ST Me • Dan Hammerstrom OGI • Philippe Coronel ST Me • Phil Kuekes HP

  3. ITRS Emerging Research Materials Working Group • Charles Black IBM • John Carruthers OGI • Alex Demkov UT Austin • Gerhard Klimeck Purdue • Mike Garner Intel • Bruno Ghyselen SOITEC • Jeff Grossman LLNL • David Muller Cornell • Dan Herr SRC • George Bourianoff Intel • Lou Lome Consultant • Rainer Waser Aachen U • Tom Theis IBM • In Keyong Yoo Samsung • Susan Holl Intel • Jim Hutchby SRC • Rafael Reif MIT • Sadasivan Shankar Intel • Shinichi Takagi U. Tokyo • Eric Vogel NIST • Kang Wang UCLA • Victor Zhirnov SRC • Dave Roberts Air Products • Ruud Tromp IBM • John Henry Scott Intel • Ted Kamins HP • Stan Williams HP

  4. ITRS Emerging Research Architectures Working Group • Rainer Waser Aachen U. • Victor Zhirnov SRC/NCSU • Dan Hammerstrom OGI • Vwani Roychowdery UCLA • Phil Kuekes HP • Mike Forshaw UCL • John Carruthers Portland SU • George Bourianoff Intel/SRC • Tobias Noll Aachen U. • Erik DeBenedictis SNL • Lou Lome Consultant

  5. On behalf of the 2005 ITRS, develop an Emerging Research Devices chapter to -- Critically assess new approaches to Information Processing technology beyond ultimate CMOS Identify promising approach(es) to Information Processing technology to be implemented by 2020 To offer substantive guidance to – Global research community Relevant government agencies Technology managers Suppliers Charter of ERD Chapter

  6. New Materials Model Knowledge New Memory and Logic Technologies New Architecture Technologies Nanotubes Molecular devices Quantum cellular automata Emerging Information Processing Concepts Scope of Emerging Research Devices2005

  7. Single Gate Non-classical CMOS Transfer to PIDS/FEP in 2005

  8. Multiple Gate Non-classical CMOS Transfer to PIDS/FEP in 2005

  9. Move to PIDS/FEP in 2005 ERD Remove SET Memory from 2005 ERD Emerging Research Memory Devices

  10. IN/OUT Reason for IN/OUT Comment Nano-Ferroelectric memory IN Based on physics of operation, this memory has potential not realized in existing FERAM Some features of Nano-Ferroelectric memory: Nanoscale FE capacitor, non-destructive readout Nano-Magnetic Memory IN Based on physics of operation, this memory has potential not realized in existing MRAM New creative ideas to the magnetization switching, e. g. spin polarized current Polymer Memory IN New materials structure, promising characteristics, several recent publications PM is different from MIM memory: it consist g MIMIM structure Single electron memory OUT It does not fit any of the application categories Small retention time, slow write, SER Emerging Research Memory Devices(Additional Changes in 2005)

  11. Emerging Research Logic Devices Replace with Ferromagnetic Logic Remove RSFQ from 2005 ERD

  12. Required characteristics: Scalability Performance Energy efficiency Gain Operational reliability Room temp. operation Preferred approach: CMOS process compatibility CMOS architectural compatibility What are we looking for? Alternative state variables • Spin–electron, nuclear, photon • Phase • Quantum state • Magnetic flux quanta • Mechanical deformation • Dipole orientation • Molecular state Alternative state variables (Beyond Charge State) • Spin State • Molecular state • Coupled Dipole-Spin State • Phase State • Quantum state • Magnetic flux quanta • Mechanical deformation • Dipole orientation

  13. Backup Slides

  14. Fundamental Requirements Energy restorative functional process (e.g. gain) Compatible with CMOS At or above room temperature operation Compelling Motivations Functionally scaleable > 100x beyond CMOS limit High information processing rate and throughput Minimum energy per functional operation Minimum, scaleable cost per function Requirements & Motivations for Information Processing Beyond CMOS

  15. New Memory and Logic Technologies New Architecture Technologies Nanotubes Molecular devices Quantum cellular automata Emerging Information Processing Concepts Scope of Emerging Research Devices2003 Bulk CMOS Double-Gate CMOS

  16. Integrated emerging research memory, logic, materials and new architecture technologies enabled by supporting -- Materials and process technologies Modeling and simulation Metrologies Selection of specific technical approaches shall be Guided by fundamental requirements Bounded by ERD’s topic selection criteria Scope of ERD Chapter

  17. Emerging Research DevicesIntroduction and Scope 2004/2005 Broadened Scope Compared to 2003 Chapter --- New quantitative performance metrics --- potential versus to-date performance In-depth critical assessment --- key application driven questions/issues Knowledge requirements roadmap --- requirements-driven research needs (new)

  18. Charge State Molecular State Spin State Orbitronic or Multiferroic State State Variables

  19. Technology Performance and Risk Evaluation Emerging Research Memory Devices

  20. Technology Performance and Risk Evaluation Emerging Research Logic Devices

  21. Transfer to PIDS/FEP in 2005 Emerging Research DevicesOrganization & Component Tasks (2003) Emerging Research Devices Non-classical CMOS Research Logic and Memory Devices Functional Organization (Architectures)

  22. Emerging Materials Add to ERD in 2004 Emerging Research DevicesOrganization & Component Tasks (2004/2005) Emerging Research Devices Emerging Logic and Memory Devices Emerging Architectures

More Related