1 / 34

B Physics of Future Hadron Facilities

B Physics of Future Hadron Facilities. Roger Forty (CERN). Extracting the physics B physics sensitivities. Workshop on the Unitarity Triangle (CKM 2005) San Diego, 17 March 2005. Introduction.

cliftonmason
Download Presentation

B Physics of Future Hadron Facilities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. B Physics of Future Hadron Facilities Roger Forty (CERN) • Extracting the physics • B physics sensitivities Workshop on the Unitarity Triangle (CKM 2005) San Diego, 17 March 2005

  2. Introduction • Until last month, “B physics of future hadron facilities” would have included both the LHC and Tevatron • Results from CDF/D0 at Tevatron have demonstrated that precision B physics is possible at hadron machines.They were to be followed by a dedicated B experiment • BTeV was a direct competitor for LHCb at the LHCWe benefited in LHCb from the fruitful exchange of ideas(for example on triggering strategy) • However, BTeV has now been cancelled, so this talk becomes “B physics at the LHC” How can B physics at the LHC progress beyond the impressive results of the B factories? Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  3. LHC experiments LHCb (that will do B physics) roughly to scale ATLAS/CMS are general purpose experiments,optimized for high pT discovery physics LHCb is a dedicated B physics experiment ATLAS CMS Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  4. LHC environment • pp collisions at s = 14 TeV, bunch crossing rate = 40 MHzLarge b cross section sbb ~ 500 mb (but ~ 0.5% of total) • At high luminosity, pile-up of pp interactions per bunch crossing: • LHCb chooses L ~ 2 1032 cm-2s-1(tuneable by defocusing beams)Should be available from day one107 s taken as nominal “year” = 2 fb-1 1012 bb produced/year • ATLAS/CMS expect L ~ 1–2 1033for the first two years  10–20 fb-1/yearthen 1034 cm-2s-1(> 20 piled-up interactions!) • LHC machine had a problem with cryogenic plumbing, now resolved: first beam expected in 2007 pp interactions/crossing Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  5. LHCb p p I will focus on LHCb, quoting results from ATLAS/CMS where relevantForward peaked production of b hadrons at LHC LHCb is a forward spectrometer (10–300 mrad) pTvsh for detected B hadrons 100 mb 230 mb Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  6. Tracking High multiplicities~ 30 long tracks/event (PYTHIA+GEANT simulation) MC truth Typical B decay length ~ 10 mm 100 mm 10 mm Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  7. Tracking MC truth Reconstructed High multiplicities~ 30 long tracks/event (PYTHIA+GEANT simulation) MC truth Typical B decay length ~ 10 mm Full pattern recognition implementedTrack finding efficiency > 95%(for B decay tracks) Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  8. Vertex detection • Vertex detector has silicon microstrips with rf geometryapproaches to 8mm from beam (inside secondary vacuum) Impact parameterresolution Momentum resolution(full spectrometer) sIP ~ 30 mm Dp/p~ 0.4% Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  9. Vertex detection • Vertex detector has silicon microstrips with rf geometryapproaches to 8mm from beam (inside secondary vacuum) Beam Proper time resolution ~ 40 fs(BsDs-p+,LHCb) cf ~ 50–70 fs (ATLAS/CMS) Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  10. Particle ID • RICH system uses novel photodetectors: Hybrid Photo Diodes ~ 500 tubes, each with 1024 pixels 2.5×2.5 mm2 p–K separation e + p test beam Unique feature of LHCb Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  11. Neutral reconstruction Merged Resolved • Use calorimeter clusters unassociated to charged tracks • Reasonable efficiency for p0achieved for B0 p+p-p0 study Resolved (separate clusters) or merged (using cluster shape) • KS p+p- efficiency ~ 75% if in vertex detector, lower otherwiseModes with multiple neutrals will be challenging… Recent study of h p+p-p0 (resolved) Mass resolution ~ 12 MeV Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  12. Trigger detector 40 MHz ATLAS/CMS ~ 10 Hz to storage for B triggers: mostly mm and high-pTm high pT (m,e,g,h) [hardware, 4ms latency] 1 MHz high IP, high pT tracks [software, 1ms] 40 kHz HLT: software using complete event [10ms] 2 kHz storage Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  13. Flavour tagging • Kaon tagging most powerful for LHCb(K± from the “opposite side” b c s) • Combined power for Bs~6% (LHCb)(cf ~ 1% at CDF/D0, ~ 30% at B Factories)Lower for B0 (~ 4%) due to reduced same-side tagging powerRecent Neural-Net based studies achieved 9% for Bs tagging (not used here) Tagging power eD2 = e(1-2w)2 (in %) Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  14. B physics sensitivity • All b hadron species are produced: B0, B+, Bs, Bc, b-baryonsExpected fractions ~ 40 : 40 : 10 : 0.1 : 10 % • One of the first physics goals (if CDF/D0 don’t beat us to it): observation of Bs–Bs oscillation • Best mode: Bs Ds-p+ • Plot made for 1 year of data (80k selected events, LHCb) for Dms = 20 ps-1 (SM preferred) • Control of mistag rate,resolution, backgroundand acceptance important Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  15. B physics sensitivity • All b hadron species are produced: B0, B+, Bs, Bc, b-baryonsExpected fractions ~ 40 : 40 : 10 : 0.1 : 10 % • One of the first physics goals (if CDF/D0 don’t beat us to it): observation of Bs–Bs oscillation • Best mode: Bs Ds-p+ • Plot made for 1 year of data (80k selected events, LHCb) for Dms = 20 ps-1 (SM preferred) • Control of mistag rate,resolution, backgroundand acceptance important Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  16. B physics sensitivity • All b hadron species are produced: B0, B+, Bs, Bc, b-baryonsExpected fractions ~ 40 : 40 : 10 : 0.1 : 10 % • One of the first physics goals (if CDF/D0 don’t beat us to it): observation of Bs–Bs oscillation • Best mode: Bs Ds-p+ • Plot made for 1 year of data (80k selected events, LHCb) for Dms = 20 ps-1 (SM preferred) • Control of mistag rate,resolution, backgroundand acceptance important Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  17. B physics sensitivity • All b hadron species are produced: B0, B+, Bs, Bc, b-baryonsExpected fractions ~ 40 : 40 : 10 : 0.1 : 10 % • One of the first physics goals (if CDF/D0 don’t beat us to it): observation of Bs–Bs oscillation • Best mode: Bs Ds-p+ • Plot made for 1 year of data (80k selected events, LHCb) for Dms = 20 ps-1 (SM preferred) • Control of mistag rate,resolution, backgroundand acceptance important Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  18. B physics sensitivity • All b hadron species are produced: B0, B+, Bs, Bc, b-baryonsExpected fractions ~ 40 : 40 : 10 : 0.1 : 10 % • One of the first physics goals (if CDF/D0 don’t beat us to it): observation of Bs–Bs oscillation • Best mode: Bs Ds-p+ • Plot made for 1 year of data (80k selected events, LHCb) for Dms = 20 ps-1 (SM preferred) • Control of mistag rate,resolution, backgroundand acceptance important Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  19. Dms • Details of LHCb performance study available in TDR (9/9/03) • Measurement of Dms using Bs Ds-p+ decaysSignal/Background (from 107 inclusive bb events) ~ 3Plot uncertainty on amplitude of fitted oscillation vsDms: • 5s observation of Bs oscillationfor Dms < 68 ps-1 (in one year) LHCb could exclude full SM range Once observed, precise value is obtained:sstat(Dms) ~ 0.01 ps-1 • For ATLAS, 5s observation for Dms < 22 ps-1 (for 10 fb-1)Most recent CMS sensitivity is lower due to trigger restriction Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  20. sin 2b • Measurement of sin 2b is not a central physics goal of LHCb (since so well measured by B factories) But will be an important check of CP analyses + can search for direct CP violating term  cos Dmdt • Expect 240k reconstructed B0 J/yKS events/year Precision sstat(sin 2b) ~ 0.02in one year for LHCb • ATLAS/CMS expect similar sensitivity for 30 fb-1 B0 mass resolution (MeV) ACP(t) (background subtracted) Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  21. fs and DGs • Bs  J/f is the Bs counterpart of the golden mode B0  J/KSCP asymmetry measures fs, the phase of Bs oscillation • In Standard Model fs is small: fs = -2l2h ~ -0.04  sensitive probe for new physics • Final state is admixture of CP-even and odd contributions angular analysis of decay products requiredL(t) = (1-R-) L+(t) (1+cos2qtr)/2 + R- L-(t) (1-cos2qtr)Fit for sinfs, R- and DGs/Gs • 120k signal events/year in LHCbs(sinfs) ~ 0.06, s(DGs/Gs) ~ 0.02(Dms = 20 ps-1)Including Bs  J/h will increase sensitivity:only ~ 7k events/year, but pure CP state • ATLAS/CMS achieve similar sensitivities for 20 fb-1 Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  22. g from Bs DsK • Bs Ds-K+ and Bs Ds+K-(b  u transition, BR ~ 7 × lower)both tree decays, which interfere via Bs mixing • CP asymmetry measures g + fsVery little theoretical uncertainty, insensitive to new physicsfs will be determined using Bs J/yf decays  extract g • Bs Ds-p+ gives background to DsK (BR ~ 12  higher)Suppress using PID residual contamination only ~ 10% • 5400 signal events/year (LHCb)S/B (from bb) > 1 (at 90% CL)(only 1 bkg event in wider MB window) Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  23. g from Bs DsK • Allow for strong phase difference D between the two diagramsFit two time-dependent asymmetries: • Phase of Ds+K- = D - (g + fs)Phase ofDs-K+ = D + (g + fs)extract both D and(g + fs) • s(g) ~ 14 in one year (LHCb)but expect it to be statistically limited • Discrete ambiguities in gcan be resolved by comparisonwith B0  D-p+ decays[Fleischer, see talk of Wilkinson] Asymmetries (5 years data) Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  24. g from B0 D0K*0 • Measure 6 decay rates: B0 D0K*0, D0K*0 and D0CPK*0(+ CP conjugates), where D0CP  K+K- (or p+p-) • Appropriate construction of amplitudes allows both g and strong phase D to be extracted [Gronau & Wyler, Dunietz] • Decays are self-tagging (through K*0  K+p-) and time integrated LHCb annual yields(for g = 65, D = 0) s(g) ~ 8(55 < g < 105,-20 < D < 20) Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  25. g from B  h+h- d g() • Time-dependent CP asymmetries for B0 p+p- and Bs K+K-ACP(t) = Adir cos(Dmt) + Amix sin(Dmt)Adir and Amix depend on weak phases g and fd (or fs), and on ratio of penguin to tree amplitudes = d eiq • Under U-spin symmetry [Fleischer](interchange of d and s quarks)dpp=dKK and qpp=qKK 4 measurements, 3 unknowns (taking fs & fd from other modes)  can solve for g • 26k B0 p+p-events/year (LHCb)37k Bs K+K- s(g) ~ 5 • Uncertainty from U-spin assumptionSensitive to new physics in penguins Bs KK B   Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  26. a from B0 p+p-p0 M2(p0p-) M2(p0p+) • Time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rp  p+p-p0 permits extraction of a along with amplitudes + strong phases[Snyder & Quinn, see talk of Deschamps] • Annual yield ~ 14k events, S/B ~ 1.3 (LHCb)Complicated 11-parameter fit, studied with toyStatistical precision of s(a) ~ 10 achievable in one yearSystematic uncertainties under study, eg from mirror solutions: Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  27. a from B0 p+p-p0 M2(p0p-) M2(p0p+) • Time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis of B0 rp  p+p-p0 permits extraction of a along with amplitudes + strong phases[Snyder & Quinn, see talk of Deschamps] • Annual yield ~ 14k events, S/B ~ 1.3 (LHCb)Complicated 11-parameter fit, studied with toyStatistical precision of s(a) ~ 10 achievable in one yearStudy of B0 rr has started, few 102r0r0 /year (for BR = 10-6) Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  28. B0 K*0m+m- AFB(s) • Suppressed decay (DB = 1 FCNC), BR ~ 10-6 • Forward-backward asymmetry in the mm rest-frame AFB(s) is sensitive probe of new physics [Ali et al] ^ AFB(s) LHCb: 4400 events/year, S/B > 0.4 AFB(s) reconstructed using toy MC (two years data, background subtracted)Zero point located to ±0.04 ATLAS: 2000 events, S/B = 7 (30 fb-1) ^ ^ s = (mmm/mB)2 Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  29. Bs m+m- • Rare decay: BR(Bs m+m-) = 3.5  10-9 in Standard ModelSensitive to new physics, can be strongly enhanced in SUSY • LHCb expect 17 selected signal events/year for SM BRProblem to estimate the background: no events selected from full background sample, but only corresponds to S/B > 2 • ATLAS/CMS yields from 100 fb-1 (1 year at 1034 cm-2s-1) Background estimates (from 1999) differ significantly, update awaited Prospect of significant BR measurement, even for SM value Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  30. Other channels Bs  f  • B0fKS is challenging for the triggerExpect ~ 1000 signal events/year in LHCb • However, if new physics is showing up in B0fKS, important to also examine other b  s penguin decays: Bs ff, KK, fg…LHCb will reconstruct large samples of each • Not yet systematically explored: Bc and b-baryon physics • Recent assignment of high rate output streams from the HLT opens possibility of charm physics: > 108 reconstructed D*/year,and inclusive b trigger (eg on single m) should give the equivalent of ~ 109 perfectly tagged b-hadron decays/year • Although detector is under construction, still room to adjust trigger to select channels of topical interest —proposals welcome!  ~ 65 MeV Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  31. Systematics • Some potential sources of systematic uncertainty: • B/B production asymmetry • Charge-dependent detection efficiencies • Background asymmetries • Trigger bias (eg for flavour tag, proper-time acceptance) • Some experimental handles available: • Control channels (eg J/yK* for J/yKS, etc) • Regular reversal of spectrometer B field • Simultaneous fit of signal and background (eg DsK/Dsp) • Analysis of tagging performance in separate categories(eg triggered on B signal/triggered on other tracks) • High rate HLT unbiased samples will allow study using data Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  32. LHCb installation status The LHCb pit 4 March 2005 Muon filter Dipole magnet (completed) Calorimeter frame Installation will be completed in 2006 Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  33. Conclusions • Experiments at the LHC expect to take B physics a significant step further than the B factories:access to other b hadron species + high statistics • LHCb combines excellent vertexing and particle IDwith flexible trigger, dedicated to B physics Various channels studied, differing sensitivity to new physics • ATLAS and CMS will also contribute significantlyCompetitive for modes with muons and small BR • Comparison with a Super B factory is interesting… but construction of LHC experiments is progressing fast: we expect to be taking data in two years’ time the case for a Super B factory should be made relative to the sum of the B factories + LHC Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

  34. LHCbyields and background Nominal year = 1012 bb pairs produced (107 s at L=21032 cm2s1 with bb=500 b) Yields include factor 2 from CP-conjugated decays Branching ratios from PDG or SM predictions Roger Forty B Physics at Future Hadron Facilities

More Related