1 / 50

The Language that Gets People to Give: Phrases that Predict Success on Kickstarter

The Language that Gets People to Give: Phrases that Predict Success on Kickstarter. Tanushree Mitra & Eric Gilbert. What makes some projects succeed while others fail ?. Predictive Features of success and failure ?. QUANTITATIVE APPROACH. Independent Variables Predictive Features.

connie
Download Presentation

The Language that Gets People to Give: Phrases that Predict Success on Kickstarter

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Language that Gets People to Give:Phrases that Predict Success on Kickstarter Tanushree Mitra & Eric Gilbert

  2. What makes some projects succeed while others fail ?

  3. Predictive Features of success and failure ?

  4. QUANTITATIVE APPROACH Independent Variables Predictive Features Statistical Model Dependent Variable: Project outcome (Funded or Not)

  5. QUANTITATIVE APPROACH Independent Variables Predictive Features (?) Statistical Model Dependent Variable: Project outcome (Funded or Not)

  6. Category Goal Video Present Duration Facebook Connected Pitch

  7. DATA 45,815K Kickstarter projects all projects as of June 2012 51.53% funded 48.47% not funded

  8. 45K Kickstarter project URLs [uni,bi,tri]-grams Fetch project end date phrase frequency > 50? Project reached end date? phrase in all 13 categories? Scrape project description Scrape control variables Lowercase text Penalized Logistic Regression Remove stop words

  9. 45K Kickstarter project URLs [uni,bi,tri]-grams Fetch project end date phrase frequency > 50? Project reached end date? phrase in all 13 categories? Scrape project pitch Scrape control variables Lowercase text Statistical Model Remove stop words

  10. 45K Kickstarter project URLs [uni,bi,tri]-grams Fetch project end date phrase frequency > 50? Project reached end date? phrase in all 13 categories? Scrape project pitch Scrape control variables Lowercase text Statistical Model Remove stop words

  11. 45K Kickstarter project URLs [uni,bi,tri]-grams Fetch project end date phrase frequency > 50? Project reached end date? phrase in all 13 categories? Scrape project pitch Scrape control variables Lowercase text Statistical Model Remove stop words

  12. 45K Kickstarter project URLs [uni,bi,tri]-grams Fetch project end date phrase frequency > 50? Project reached end date? phrase in all 13 categories? Scrape project pitch Scrape control variables Lowercase text Statistical Model Remove stop words

  13. 45K Kickstarter project URLs [uni,bi,tri]-grams Fetch project end date phrase frequency > 50? Project reached end date? phrase in all 13 categories? Scrape project pitch Scrape control variables Lowercase text Statistical Model Remove stop words

  14. ~20K unigrams, bigrams, trigrams Pitch

  15. 45K Kickstarter project URLs [uni,bi,tri]-grams Fetch project end date phrase frequency > 50? Project reached end date? phrase in all 13 categories? Scrape project pitch 59 control variables Scrape control variables Lowercase text Statistical Model Remove stop words

  16. Category Goal Video Present Duration Facebook Connected

  17. 45K Kickstarter project URLs [uni,bi,tri]-grams Fetch project end date phrase frequency > 50? Project reached end date? phrase in all 13 categories? Scrape project pitch 59 control variables Scrape control variables Lowercase text Statistical Model Remove stop words

  18. STATISTICAL TECHNIQUE Independent Variables Phrases (20K) + Controls (59) Statistical Model Dependent Variable: Project outcome (Funded or Not)

  19. STATISTICAL TECHNIQUE Independent Variables Phrases (20K) + Controls (59) Penalized Logistic Regression Dependent Variable: Project outcome (Funded or Not) Friedman et al. 2010

  20. Results: MODEL FITS Baseline Model | Error | 48.47 % Controls Only Model Explanatory Power | Error 40.8 %| 17.03% Explanatory Power | Error Phrases + Controls Model 58.56 %| 2.24%

  21. (NF) Predictors not been able( β = − 4.07 ) “I have not been able to finish the film because none of my editors will see the project through to the end.”

  22. (NF) Predictors later i( β = − 3.04 ) hope to get( β = − 2.39 ) “I can’t take size orders and possibly hope to getthem all made in time for christmas.”

  23. (NF) Predictors even a dollar ( β = − 3.10 )

  24. Wattenberg&Viégas, 2008

  25. (F) Predictors mention your( β =2.69 ) also receive( β = 1.83 ) add $40 and you will also receive two viptickets to the premiere screening.

  26. (F) Predictors next step is ( β =1.07 ) Recording is pretty much done, next step is production.

  27. (F) Predictors cats( β =2.64 )

  28. UNDERSTANDING CONTEXT A closer look at predictive phrases

  29. Principles of Persuasion Cialdini, R. B. 1993

  30. Principles of Persuasion • Reciprocity • Scarcity • Authority • Social Proof • Social Identity • Liking Cialdini, R. B. 1993

  31. Principles of Persuasion • Reciprocity • Scarcity • Authority • Social Proof • Social Identity • Liking Cialdini, R. B. 1993

  32. RECIPROCITY Brehm & Cole 1966, Goranson & Berkowitz, 1966, Ciladini 2001

  33. RECIPROCITY we’ll mention your (β= 2.69) name in the sleeve of our full length album

  34. RECIPROCITY I will thank you on my website, send you goodkarmaand(β = 2.04)..

  35. SCARCITY Ciladini 2001, Ciladini & Goldstein 2004

  36. SCARCITY also, you will be given the chance (β= 2.69) to purchase our small batch pieces before the public domain

  37. AUTHORITY Ciladini 2001, Ciladini & Goldstein 2004

  38. AUTHORITY the project will be (β= 18.48) produced by dove award winning producer

  39. SOCIAL PROOF Ciladini 2001

  40. SOCIAL PROOF [name] has pledged (β = 5.42) some money..… so, you can see that i already have people willing to support my art.

  41. Language is a reliable signal of success of crowd-funded projects So are some controls…. … …

  42. IMPLICATIONS

  43. IMPLICATIONS

  44. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~tmitra3/data/KS.predicts Also at: http://b.gatech.edu/1mf1C6E

  45. The Language that Gets People to Give:Phrases that Predict Success on Kickstarter Tanushree Mitra & Eric Gilbert @tanmit | @eegilbert DATA: http://b.gatech.edu/1mf1C6E

  46. Fancy Stats. Huh! Google 1T Corpus phrases Search for phrases with significantly higher difference + Membership higher in Ggle 1T χ2 test between phrase frequencies + Bonferroni Correction Scan presence of KS phrases in Google 1T 54K Kickstarter phrases Non-zero β weights • GENERAL PHRASES: • 494 positive predictors • 453 negative predictors next step is in the upcoming to announce …. provide us need one ….

More Related