1 / 7

Before the iMAF ... The situation No strong legal basis for cooperation between institutes

(tentative) Conclusions of the Conference iMAF 2014, Reichenau (AT) Sylvain Paile University of Liège (BE) spaile@ulg.ac.be. Before the iMAF ... The situation No strong legal basis for cooperation between institutes Strategic culture and education: the chicken or the egg?

cosima
Download Presentation

Before the iMAF ... The situation No strong legal basis for cooperation between institutes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. (tentative) Conclusions of the ConferenceiMAF 2014, Reichenau (AT)Sylvain PaileUniversity of Liège (BE)spaile@ulg.ac.be

  2. Before the iMAF... The situation • No strong legal basis for cooperation between institutes • Strategic culture and education: the chicken or the egg? • The common modules were “evolutive” • A need to “revitalize” the LoD8 • The reflection of the expertise of the institution of origin • “Academic” first, then “vocational” • Attempts of training material not satisfying

  3. Beginning of the iMAF... Assumptions • Space for new common modules • “Managing future challenges” and “future management of (today and future) challenges” • A “vocational” future (?): practice-oriented & branch-oriented • Focus on learning outcomes: addition of environment to content of learning • Propositions of common modules can depart from a need or a (pre-existing) expertise • Modularisation is a challenge

  4. End of the iMAF... Findings (I) • New common modules have been proposed • Hard to say that they are all about “managing future challenges”rather than “future management of (today and future) challenges” • 6 propositions are related to vocational, 7 to academic, 2 of them can be seen as cross-cutting. Majority of teaching/instructing methods. Majority “all arms”; • An effort for describing the learning outcomes, in line with the LoD2 • Most of the propositions formulated are offers of existing modules in the institutions of origin • Modularisation is an intent

  5. End of the iMAF... Findings (II) Categories of modules: • Personal development • Mental • Physical • Knowing the strategic environment • Managing the operational environment

  6. After the iMAF... Action! • 9 modules’ curricula can be proposed to the Initiative’s Implementation Group for consideration • Acceptance of modularisation • Acknowledgement of the outcomes (LoD2) • Recognition of mobility experiences • Commitment: organisation & participation • A “catalogue”? • Supporting teaching and training material

  7. Thank you for your inputs… … Confident in the outputs! Sylvain Paile spaile@ulg.ac.be

More Related