1 / 20

The Costs and Benefits of Carbon Capture and Storage

INTEK. The Costs and Benefits of Carbon Capture and Storage. Khosrow Biglarbigi Hitesh Mohan Marshall Carolus. July 16, 2009 Calgary, Canada. CO 2 Emissions from Energy Consumption. United States. Billion Tons of CO 2. 20% Increase. Year. Source: US EIA. So, What Do We Do With It? .

crete
Download Presentation

The Costs and Benefits of Carbon Capture and Storage

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INTEK The Costs and Benefits of Carbon Capture and Storage Khosrow Biglarbigi Hitesh Mohan Marshall Carolus July 16, 2009 Calgary, Canada

  2. CO2 Emissions from Energy Consumption United States Billion Tons of CO2 20% Increase Year Source: US EIA

  3. So, What Do We Do With It? Capture Use Transport

  4. Potential Uses of CO2 CO2 Food Grade Industrial Grade Options with Environmental and Economic Benefits Options with Environmental Benefits Sequestration

  5. CO2 Capture TechnologyAmine Absorber Acid Gas Condenser CO2 Flue Gas without CO2 Amine Stripper Amine Absorber Make-Up Water Lean Solution Cooler Feed Gas Lean Solution Pump Lean/Rich Exchanger Amine Reboiler Source: UOP, “Amine GuardTM FS Process” 2000.

  6. Variations of Technology(Proprietary Licenses) • Amine with SO2 removal – Kerr McGee/ABB Lummus • Costain Oil Gas and Process Limited (natural gas) • Amine Guard and Amine Guard II – UOP • Econamine FG – Fluor Daniel, Inc. • Hindered Amine – Flexsorb HP (Exxon) and Giammarco-Vetrocoke

  7. CO2 Capture Technology (Cont.) • Cold Methanol • Pressure Swing Adsorption • Hot Potassium Carbonate • Membrane (unproven) • Amine/membrane combination

  8. Cost of Capturing Industrial CO2 Capture Cost Sources: Global Energy Technology Strategy Program, NETL, and others

  9. CO2 Transportation • Pipeline • CO2 must be dried • High compression required for transport (2000-3000 psig) • Drying and compression cost is estimated at $9 per ton • Truck, Barge, Ship • CO2 is transported as a liquid • Liquefaction infrastructure is required • Additional loading and unloading activities • Liquefaction cost is estimated at $10 per ton • Shipping cost is estimated at $1-$10 per ton

  10. Options with Environmental Benefits Brine Aquifer Ocean Bed Storage

  11. Options with Environmental and Economic Benefits Coal Bed Methane EOR Gas Storage Gas Bearing Sandstone Gas Bearing Shale

  12. Costs and Benefits of SequestrationDollar per Ton of CO2 CO2 ($1-10) ($31-55) Sequestration EOR Oil & Gas Res. ($1-10) Gas Bearing Sandstone ($33-75) $36 - 106 Brine Aquifer Gas Bearing Shale $4 - 41 ($1-10) Coal Bed Methane Ocean Bed ($39-106) ($7- 41) Gas Storage (Base Gas)

  13. Example Application in the United StatesCO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Proven Technology 100 Projects in 2008 (USA) Production of 240 MBbl/Day Number of Projects Production MBbl/D Year Year Source: Oil & Gas Journal

  14. Projects Using CO2 from Natural Sources(61 Million Ton/Year) Source: Oil and Gas Journal

  15. Industrial Sources of CO2(2 Billion Tons of CO2 in 2007)

  16. CO2 EOR Candidate Fields(1,700 Reservoirs, 20 Billion Barrels)

  17. Proximity of the Sources to the Fields

  18. Incremental Production Daily Oil Production from Additional CO2 EOR Daily Oil Production (MBbl) Total of 4.7 Billion Bbl Year

  19. Additional Benefit: CO2 Storage(Cumulative Over 25 Years) 25 Trillion Cubic Feet CO2 Stored (Trillion Cubic Feet)

  20. Summary • Capture Technologies are Advancing Rapidly • Sequestration Options are Widely Available • The Process is Both Site and Project Specific • Both Environmental and Economic Benefits can be Realized

More Related