1 / 55

Overview of CMS heavy -ion results

Overview of CMS heavy -ion results. Raphaël Granier de Cassagnac for the CMS collaboration LLR – École polytechnique / IN2P3 ERC grant “ QuarkGluonPlasmaCMS ” LHC days , October 2 nd 2012, Split. A wealth of results. Affordable in a 20’ talk?.

danika
Download Presentation

Overview of CMS heavy -ion results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of CMS heavy-ion results Raphaël Granier de Cassagnac for the CMS collaboration LLR – École polytechnique / IN2P3 ERC grant “QuarkGluonPlasmaCMS” LHC days, October 2nd2012, Split

  2. A wealth of results Affordable in a 20’ talk? raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split • Multiplicity and transverse energy • dNch/dη ≈ 1600 and dET/dη ≈ 2 TeV ! • Particle correlations • Elliptic flow (incl. π0) and higher harmonics • Di-hadron correlations (the “ridge”) • Candles: Electro+weak bosons • Z and W bosons • Isolated photons • Jet quenching • Photon+Jet • Fully reconstructed jets • Jet fragmentation & shape • Quarkoniumsuppression • Five states disappearing

  3. A wealth of results All results available at https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsHIN Or google search “CMS heavy ions” 18 submitted PbPb papers (as many as ALICE) + 10 documented preliminary analysis (PAS) Affordable in a 20’ talk? raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split • Multiplicity and transverse energy • dNch/dη ≈ 1600 and dET/dη ≈ 2 TeV ! • Particle correlations • Elliptic flow and higher harmonics • Di-hadron correlations (the “ridge”) • Candles: Electro+weak bosons • Z and W bosons • Isolated photons • Jet quenching • Photon+Jet • Fully reconstructed jets • Jet fragmentation & shape • Quarkoniumsuppression • Five states disappearing

  4. Particule detection |η|<2.4 Muons 1-2% resolution up to 100 GeV/c Photons 10% resolution in central events at 20 GeV EMCal PbWO4 |η|<3 Muon: drift tubes + RPC |η|<2.4 Silicium: pixels (3) and strips (10) |η|<2.4 HCal: Scintillators |η|<5 + high rapidity extension raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  5. Pb-Pbcollision raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  6. From the key concept: centrality… raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split • Collision centrality related to energy deposit in (forward) calorimeters • Then to geometrical quantities: • Ncoll = number of elementary NN collisions • or TAA = Ncoll / σpp • Hard probes are supposed to scale with Ncoll, in the absence of medium effect, RAA = 1

  7. … to the nuclear modification factor RAA dNAA dNAA RAA= = dNPP x Ncoll dσPP x TAA raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split • Collision centrality related to energy deposit in (forward) calorimeters • Then to geometrical quantities: • Ncoll = number of elementary NN collisions • or TAA = Ncoll / σpp • Hard probes are supposed to scale with Ncoll, in the absence of medium effect, RAA = 1

  8. PbPb collisions @ √sNN = 2.76 TeV Dec. 2011: ≈ 150 μb–1PbPb x 20 Dec. 2010: ≈ 7 μb–1PbPb • Binary-scaled • equivalent •  as many • Z, W, photons… + Mar. 2011 ≈ 230 nb–1pp@2.76 TeV raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  9. Electro+Weak bosons should go through the colored medium without feeling it New candles raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  10. Z boson centrality independence (150 μb–1) dNAA RAA = dσPP x TAA • Very low pp statistics available at 2.76 TeV ≈ 20 times less Z than PbPb raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  11. Z boson centrality independence (150 μb–1) • (PRL 106 (2011) 212301) • CMS-PAS-HIN-12-008 • Very low pp statistics available at 2.76 TeV ≈ 20 times less Z than PbPb dNAA / TAA = dσppx RAA raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  12. Z boson centrality independence (150 μb–1) • (PRL 106 (2011) 212301) • CMS-PAS-HIN-12-008 • Very low pp statistics available at 2.76 TeV ≈ 20 times less Z than PbPb • Compare to POWHEG (NLO generator) instead • Well tested at Tevatron (2 TeV) and LHC (7 TeV) • 5% uncertainty from NNLO, pdfs, etc. dNAA / TAA = dσppx RAA raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  13. Z boson centrality independence (150 μb–1) • (PRL 106 (2011) 212301) • CMS-PAS-HIN-12-008 • Very low pp statistics available at 2.76 TeV ≈ 20 times less Z than PbPb • Compare to POWHEG (NLO generator) instead • Well tested at Tevatron (2 TeV) and LHC (7 TeV) • 5% uncertainty from NNLO, pdfs, etc. dNAA / TAA = dσppx RAA RAA = 0.95 ± 0.03 ± 0.13 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  14. W boson centrality independence (7.2 μb–1) dNAA / TAA = dσppx RAA W W+ W– • PLB 715 (2012) 66 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  15. W boson centrality independence (7.2 μb–1) dNAA / TAA = dσppx RAA • PLB 715 (2012) 66 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  16. W boson centrality independence (7.2 μb–1) 2010 PbPb ≈ pp data RAA(W) = 1.04 ± 0.07 ± 0.12 RAA(W+) = 0.82 ± 0.07 ± 0.09 RAA(W–) = 1.46 ± 0.14 ± 0.16 Consistent with pure isospin dNAA / TAA = dσppx RAA More d quarks in Pb make more W+ than in pp • PLB 715 (2012) 66 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  17. Photon centrality independence (7.2 μb–1) ( isolated photons, after large background subtraction ) • PLB 710 (2012) 256 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  18. Unmodified electro+weak bosons • Within uncertainties, electro+weak bosons are not modified • Confirm the validity of Ncoll scaling • More precision may reveal nuclear PDF modifications • But let’s first use these calibrated probes… raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  19. Jet quenching

  20. Photon+jet(150 μb–1) Area normalized to unity Pythia+Hydjet Photon-jet momentum balance arXiv:1205.0206 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  21. Photon+jet(150 μb–1) Area normalized to unity 0-10% PbPb Pythia+Hydjet Photon-jet momentum balance arXiv:1205.0206 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  22. Photon+jet(150 μb–1) Pythia+Hydjet Area normalized to unity 0-10% Jet-photon pT balance 14% drop pp PbPb PbPb Pythia+Hydjet Pythia+Hydjet 20% lose jet partner Photon-jet momentum balance pp PbPb arXiv:1205.0206 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  23. Modified jet RAA(150 μb–1) CMS-PAS-HIN-12-004 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  24. Jet RAA Cone size R = 0.3, but does not vary a lot for R = 0.2 or 0.4 CMS-PAS-HIN-12-004 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  25. Wheredoes the energy go? 100 GeV inclusive jet Anti-kT R=0.3 jet in PYTHIA 95% of jet energy in r < 0.2 95% of jet energy in pT > 4 GeV particles PRC 84 (2011) 024906 G. Roland at QM’12 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split • To large angle & low pT • Qualitative idea in the first 2010 (di)jet paper • Quantitatively • Low pT, fragmentation functions • Large angle, jet shape

  26. Jet fragmentation arXiv:1205.5872 accepted by JHEP vsCMS-PAS-HIN-12-013 ξ = ln(1/z) & z=pT(track)/pT(jet) where pT(jet) is quenched already ( < pT(parton) ) ξ raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split At first sight (QM’11, run 1, pT(track) > 4 GeV & pT(jet) > 100 GeV), surviving jets are not modified Looking closer (QM’12, run 2, pT(track) > 1 GeV & more energetic jets), modifications appear

  27. Jet fragmentation and shapes PbPb/pp distributions No change at small r, high pT Narrowing/depletion at intermediate pT Broadening/excess at large r, low pT CMS-PAS-HIN-12-013 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  28. Back to RAA of jets(and b-jet) Note: first b-jet identification in heavy-ion collisions CMS-PAS-HIN-12-003 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  29. Back to RAA of jets, and hadrons Jets: CMS-PAS-HIN-12-004 Hadrons: EPJC 72 (2012) 1945 G. Roland at QM’12 Looking at the same partonpT range PbPb fragmentation function = pp for ξ <1 Charged particles with pT= 50-100 GeV/c z = pT(track)/pT(jet) = 0.4-0.6 x < 1 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  30. Quarkonia

  31. Quarkonium suppression Matsui & Satz, PLB168 (1986) 415 • Old predicted signature of the QGP • Quarkonia should melt one after the other, depending on their binding energy • Recent example of melting temperatures  • @ SPS / RHIC, no / marginal access to the (yet unresolved) Upsilon family • @ SPS, J/ψ and ψ’ studied in detail • @ RHIC, J/ψ brought up surprises… • Though they are suppressed, the balance of various effects is not clear… ϒ(1S) χb J/ψ, ϒ(2S) χc, χ’b, ψ', ϒ(3S) Mocsy, EPJC61 (2009) 705 BNL workshop in June raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  32. Prompt J/ψ suppression centrality • CMS J/ψpT > 6.5 GeV/c • Material and B-field • Feed down from B  J/ψ is subtracted • More suppression than at RHIC • CMS < STAR (pT > 5 GeV/c) • More suppression than at low pT • CMS<ALICE (all pT) • Popular explanation: regeneration from uncorrelated and • Stronger at low pT > 100 pairs in a central event JHEP05 (2012) 176 & CMS-HIN-PAS-12-014 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  33. Prompt J/ψ suppression centrality • CMS J/ψpT > 6.5 GeV/c • Material and B-field • Feed down from B  J/ψ is subtracted • More suppression than at RHIC (at high pT) • CMS < STAR (pT > 5 GeV/c) • Less suppression at low pT • CMS<ALICE (inclusive, all pT) • Popular explanation: regeneration from uncorrelated and • Stronger at low pT > 100 pairs in a central event JHEP05 (2012) 176 & CMS-HIN-PAS-12-014 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  34. First look at ψ(2S) CMS-PAS-HIN-12-007 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split • Relatively less ψ(2S) than J/ψ, as expected @ midrapidity|y|< 1.6, thus high pT > 6.5 GeV • (a hint of an opposite behaviour at lower pT, but less than 2σ)

  35. Upsilon (1S), (2S) and (3S) (PRL107 (2011) 052302) arXiv:1208.2826 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  36. Upsilons (1S), (2S) and (3S) Upsilon(1S) and (2S) at LHC Sequential disappearance of the 3 states For minimum bias RAA (Y(1S)) = 0.56 ± 0.08 ± 0.07 RAA (Y(2S)) = 0.12 ± 0.04 ± 0.02 RAA (Y(3S)) < 0.10 @ 95% CL (Remember a large part of Y(2S) comes from higher state decays, in particular the χb) (PRL107 (2011) 052302) arXiv:1208.2826 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  37. Five states to bind them all Forgetting low pT J/ψ (regeneration) for a while… RAA(MB) vs binding energy looks ordered… TBD with more data vs centrality and unfolding cold effects (pA) & feeddown could start acting as a thermometer? Mironov at QM’12 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  38. To conclude 1/ Being interpreted in terms of Quark-Gluon Plasma properties… 2/ Once we have checked what happens in pPb (2013…) raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split Three unmodified control probes (photon, Z and W) Detailed studies of jet quenching Five quarkoniumsuppressions And more!

  39. Back up

  40. W boson production @ LO : & Less W+ and more W– in PbPb than in pp (isospin effect) • Cancels for W+ + W– • W boosted towards the valence quark (higher rapidity) • Spin conservation μ+ (μ–) boosted back to (awayfrom) midrapidity • Different muon rapidity distributions (not heavy-ion specific) between W+ and W– ud p p W+ μ+ ν raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  41. Muon charge asymmetry N+ – N– N+ + N– |ημ| • PLB 715 (2012) 66 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split Less up quarks make less W+ in PbPb than in pp Isospin effect bringing down asymmetry by 0.2 to 0.4 (EPS09 modifications are 0.03 at most)

  42. How to find photons? Δϕ • Trigger on ECAL clusters • Uncorrected ET > 15 GeV, fully efficient for ET > 20 GeV • Subtract underlying event • From same pseudorapidity strip, event by event • Look for isolated cluster • Remove photons from bremsstrahlung and jet fragmentation… • Look at shower shape in the highly segmented ECAL • Further remove isolated π0, η Δη photon-like π,η 2γ raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  43. Photon spectrum (2010) • PLB 710 (2012) 256 Consistent with JETPHOX With unmodified pdf (CT10) raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  44. Unmodified photons • PLB 710 (2012) 256 • Normalised by pp! • Consistent with unity! • Uncertainties still • larger than modified • pdf uncertainties… raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  45. Jet reconstruction performances Resolution Responce raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  46. raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  47. raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  48. raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

  49. Modified hadrons (150 μb–1) EPJC 72 (2012) 1945 raphael@in2p3.fr - Heavy ions in CMS - Split

More Related