1 / 11

Basin Plan trade-offs

Environmental Water Mike Young Executive Director, The Environment Institute Email: Mike.Young@adelaide.edu.au. Basin Plan trade-offs. Conveyance to and through Mouth only 9 in 10 yrs Prepared to lose 25% of red gum forests

deanna
Download Presentation

Basin Plan trade-offs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Environmental Water Mike Young Executive Director, The Environment InstituteEmail: Mike.Young@adelaide.edu.au

  2. Basin Plan trade-offs • Conveyance to and through Mouth only 9 in 10 yrs • Prepared to lose 25% of red gum forests • Most benefits from 3,000 GL to 4,000 GL are local and occur within region where purchases are to occur • States must comply with SDLs even if Commonwealth fails to buy enough water

  3. Flood water Entitlements Entitlements Environment Environment with a fully-specified share Volume of water available Shared Water Water needed to ensure conveyance

  4. Key Ecosystem Functions& conveyance How conveyance is defined matters

  5. Institutional design tasks • Structural arrangements • How environmental water needs are defined • How environmental water entitlements are held • Strategic arrangements • Who manages • What options are available to managers • Who is accountable for performance • Tactics • How much flexibility can we give environmental managers? • Could set up Regional Environmental Trusts to take prime responsibility and be accountable for environmental water

  6. Structural arrangements • How should the environment’s entitlement be specified? • Same as all other entitlements • Who should own the environment’s entitlement? • How much held centrally • How much held regionally or leased on long term basis to a region • What would a regional trust look like? • Unrestricted carry forward? • Current carry forward rules designed for irrigation industry (efficiency and equity) • Continuous accounting would mean less entitlements have to be purchased for the environment • Should the environment have to pay its way? • Much greater independence if trusts have to pay their way • Could be done by forcing them to sell allocations every year

  7. How much water • Remember floodwater and conveyance water contributes to environmental outcomes • What type of outcomes do communities want? • A Heritage River • A Conservation River • A Healthy Working River • It may be possible to downsize (reconfigure) some parts of the system • The MDBA could use the SDL algebra to define a target portfolio of water entitlements to be secured for each region => an approach that works with the people in each region • The more innovative the institutional arrangements, the less the amount of water needed for the same environmental outcome

  8. “Take” environmentally sustainable level of take for a water resource means the level at which water can be taken from that water resource which, if exceeded, would compromise: (a) key environmental assets of the water resource; or (b) key ecosystem functions of the water resource; or (c) the productive base of the water resource; or (d) key environmental outcomes for the water resource. • Water allocated to the environment by definition is not part of the “take”

  9. Section 23 Water Act (1) A long‑term average sustainable diversion limit for the Basin water resources, for the water resources of a particular water resource plan area ...... must reflect an environmentally sustainable level of take. (2) A long‑term average sustainable diversion limit for the Basin water resources, for the water resources of a particular water resource plan area ... may be specified: (a) as a particular quantity of water per year; or (b) as a formula or other method that may be used to calculate a quantity of water per year; or (c) in any other way that the Authority determines to be appropriate.

  10. Summary • Institutional arrangements matter • A regional approach may offer a way forward • In preference to volumes, the focus should be on the portfolio of entitlements that need to be secured • Need to always allow the purchase of water entitlements for the environment after all plans are in place! text

  11. www.adelaide.edu.au/environment www.myoung.net.au

More Related