1 / 16

Tracking Stopping Times Through Noisy Observations

Tracking Stopping Times Through Noisy Observations. Presented By Harshal Patil. Paper By Urs Niesen and Aslan Tchamkerten. Presentation Overview. Introduction Problem Statement Applications The Optimization Problem Algorithm Examples Conclusion. Problem Statement.

Download Presentation

Tracking Stopping Times Through Noisy Observations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tracking Stopping Times Through Noisy Observations Presented By HarshalPatil Paper By UrsNiesen and AslanTchamkerten

  2. Presentation Overview • Introduction • Problem Statement • Applications • The Optimization Problem • Algorithm • Examples • Conclusion

  3. Problem Statement • Tracking Stopping Time is defined as follows: • Let be a sequence of pairs of random variables . Alice observes and chooses a stopping time (s.t.) with respect to that sequence. • Knowing the distribution of and the stopping rule , but having access only to the ’s, Bob wishes to find a s.t. that gets as close as possible to Alice’s. • Bob aims to find a s.t. minimizing the expected reaction delay , while keeping the false-alarm probability below a certain threshold

  4. Applications(1) • Monitoring: • Let be the distance of an object from a barrier at time , and let be the first time the object hits the barrier, i.e., • Assume we have access to only through a noisy measurement , and that we want to raise an alarm as soon as the object hits the barrier. • This problem can be formulated as the one of finding a s.t. with respect to the ’s that minimizes the expected reaction delay , while keeping the false-alarm probability small enough.

  5. Application (2) • Communication: • Presence of a noiseless feedback link a variable-length strategy is used where the encoder keeps sending the bit it wishes to convey until it is successfully received. • But Presence of the noisy feedback link, a synchronization problem between the decoder and the encoder arises. • This agreement problem occurs because the encoder observes only a noisy version of the symbols received by the decoder (see Fig. 1).

  6. Application (2) • Communication: • In terms of the TST problem, Alice and Bob represent the decoder and the encoder, the ’s and ’s correspond to the input and output symbols of the feedback channel, whereas and represent the decoding time and the time the encoder stops transmission, respectively. • Here represents the delay needed by the encoder to realize that the decoder has made a decision, and we aim to minimize it given that the probability of stopping transmission too early, , is kept below a certain threshold .

  7. Application (3) • Bayesian Change-Point Detection (Original Formulation): • Let be a sequence of random variables such that, given the value of , the conditional probability of given • We are interested in a s.t. with respect to the ’s minimizing the change-point reaction delay , while keeping the false-alarm probability below a certain threshold • Bayesian change-point problem(TST Formulation) • The sequence of binary random variables such that if and if , and to let . The change-point problem defined by and becomes the TST problem defined by and .

  8. The Optimization Problem • Let be a discrete-time process where the ’sand ’s take value in some finite alphabets and , respectively. Let be a s.t. with respect to such that almost surely for some constant . We aim to find for any where the s.t.’s are possibly randomized. Note that the restriction is without loss of optimality.

  9. Notations • To any nonrandomized s.t. ,associate a unique - ary tree . • the leaves of and the inter-mediate nodes of . • is sequence of stopping time ‘s for stopping time . • is sequence of Lagrange multiplier. • are breakpoints of . • Concept of Tree

  10. Algorithm for Computing

  11. Permutation invariant

  12. One-Step Look-Ahead Time

  13. Example

  14. Summary • In above analysis, the finite tree structure of bounded s.t.’s defined over finite alphabet processes was exploited, and an algorithm was derived that outputs the minimum reaction delays for tracking a s.t. through noisy observations, for any probability of false alarm. • This algorithm has a complexity that is exponential in the bound of the s.t. to track and, in certain cases, even polynomial. In comparison, an exhaustive search has a complexity that is doubly exponential. • The conditions under which the algorithm runs in polynomial time are, unfortunately, not very explicit and require further study . Explicit conditions, however, are expected to be very restrictive on both the stochastic process and the s.t. to be tracked. • For certain applications, it is suitable to consider s.t.’sdefined over more general processes, such as continuous time over continuous alphabets. • In this case, how to solve the TST problem remains a wide open question. As a first step, one might consider a time and alphabet quantization and apply the result in order to derive an approximation algorithm.

  15. Reerences • Tracking Stopping Times Through Noisy Observations by UrsNiesen, Student Member, IEEE, and AslanTchamkerten

  16. Thank you

More Related