1 / 15

Global Privacy and Information Quality Working Group

Global Privacy and Information Quality Working Group. Chairman Carl Wicklund. Global Working Group Liaisons. Global Infrastructure/Standards Working Group Scott Fairholm Global Intelligence Working Group Alan Carlson Global Outreach and Training Working Group Open seat

dixon
Download Presentation

Global Privacy and Information Quality Working Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Global Privacy and Information Quality Working Group Chairman Carl Wicklund

  2. Global Working Group Liaisons • Global Infrastructure/Standards Working Group • Scott Fairholm • Global Intelligence Working Group • Alan Carlson • Global Outreach and Training Working Group • Open seat • Global Security Working Group • Cindy Southworth

  3. Mission • To advance the adoption of privacyand information quality policies by justice system participants that promote the responsible collection, handling, management, review, and sharing of (personal) information about individuals

  4. Privacy Policy Development Guide and Implementation Templates “To advance the adoption of privacy . . . policies”

  5. Information Quality: The Foundation for Justice Decision Making “To advance the adoption of information quality . . . policies”

  6. 2007 Priorities • Short-term development • Information Quality (IQ) Self-Assessment Tools (IQAT) • Privacy and IQ in Fusion Center Processes • Training and Outreach • Long-term development • IQ Guidebook

  7. United States Department of Justice Report on IQ Assessment Tool (IQAT) Task Team • Meetings • (Kickoff) February 27, 2007, Washington, DC • (Half-day) March 13, 2007, Phoenix, AZ • Research and review of existing work • Multiple Dimensions of Information Quality, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) • Information Quality Characteristics, Larry P. English • Methods of Data Quality Control: For Uniform Crime Reporting Programs, FBI CJIS • Auditing Methods, Delaware State Police • Law Enforcement Automated Data System (LEADS), Ohio State Highway Patrol • International Standardization Organization (ISO) 9001:2000 Compliance Certification, Phoenix Police Department

  8. IQAT Task Team (continued) • Self-Assessment Framework: Information Life Cycle

  9. IQAT Task Team (continued) • Current Status: IQ Self-Assessment Questionnaire • Apply to one common process (e.g., fingerprinting or booking) • Using the structure of the information life cycle, draft self-assessment questions to ensure IQ at each phase • Do not dictate a specific solution • Get people asking the right questions at each phase, and prompt them to seek out the right solution • IQAT Task Team drafted higher- and lower-level questions an agency might ask according to a common process

  10. IQAT Task Team (continued) • By next GPIQWG, the task team proposes to • Come up with additional questions for various pieces of information • Determine whether we need additional principles in respect to the information under arraignment • Are there any principles that do not relate or apply to this event? • Provide best practices/solutions/guidance • Provide authoritative definitions for the information life cycle phases and components

  11. Report on Fusion Center Processes (FCP) Task Team • Meetings • Breakout sessions during GPIQWG meetingsOctober 4, 2006, and March 14, 2007 • By next GPIQWG, the task team proposes to • Develop an outline of talking points and a PowerPoint presentation to show why fusion centers should be concerned about accuracy, as well as privacy • Current Status B Team Lead Alan Carlson has drafted an outline of presentation points and has distributed them to the task team for its review

  12. Report on Training and Outreach Task Team • Meetings • Breakout sessions during GPIQWG meetingsOctober 4, 2006, and March 14, 2007 • By next GPIQWG, the task team proposes to • Develop a “workshop in a box” for conferences (a briefer version of the Privacy Policy Development Guide and Implementation Templates—to make it more approachable) • Pilot the “workshop in a box” at the National Criminal Justice Association (NCJA) National Forum, July 30–31, 2007, to test out the training/briefing this group developed

  13. Report on IQ Guidebook Task Team • Meetings • Breakout sessions during GPIQWG meetingsOctober 4, 2006, and March 14, 2007 • By next GPIQWG, the task team proposes to • Write a draft of the introduction section—“Why is IQ important?” “What is the purpose of the guide?” “How do you use the guide, and who is this guide for?” • Draft the Elements of IQ chapter—definition (IQ, data versus information); dimensions; recognize traditional measures; and dimensions on input, output, storage, and retention • A stand-alone piece, “What does an IQ program look like (elements)?” • Solicit assistance from GAC to gather additional policies that are out there

  14. Next Meetings in Washington, DC • IQ Assessment Tool Task Team • Two half-day meetings tentatively scheduled • 1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m., June 25, 2007 • 8:30 a.m. – 12:00 Noon, June 26, 2007 • GPIQWG • One-and-a-half-day meeting tentatively scheduled • 1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m., June 26, 2007 • 8:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m., June 27, 2007

  15. Questions?

More Related