1 / 21

Neutrinos Don’t Exist

Neutrinos Don’t Exist. David de Hilster. Neutrino: Dissidents = Mainstream. Dissidents accept the neutrino at face value Dissidents don’t study the neutrino with their typical skeptical eyes If dissidents were to study the history of the neutrino, they would dismiss it quickly

dobry
Download Presentation

Neutrinos Don’t Exist

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Neutrinos Don’t Exist David de Hilster

  2. Neutrino: Dissidents = Mainstream • Dissidents accept the neutrino at face value • Dissidents don’t study the neutrino with their typical skeptical eyes • If dissidents were to study the history of the neutrino, they would dismiss it quickly • Dissidents are scared to say it doesn’t exist without study (I don’t know why)

  3. Neutrino Origin • Wolfgang Pauli postulated it • Applied Relativistic kinematic equations to decay • BAD! – Decay (radioactivity) is not kinetic in nature • Did it anyways • Pauli died, Enrique Fermi named it the neutron but it was take, called it the neutrino

  4. Radium E (Bismuth) Decay

  5. No Special Relativity is FINE!

  6. Particle Accelerators • Mainstream admits (not that loudly) that mass increase is not observed in particle accelerators • Where else would it be more evident? • Logically, this destroys special relativity • But no, they keep it around by using the relativistic kinematic equations at the collision end PLUS the neutrino

  7. 1 + (1 – 1) = 1 • If you don’t use the relativistic kinematic equations, you don’t need the neutrino (See Carezani et. al) • Decay is perfectly describable without the neutrino and everything balances • The neutrino only exists because special relativity predicts “extra” energy

  8. Non-Evidence with Evidence

  9. Neutrino Detectors • What are neutrino detectors detecting if they are not detecting neutrinos? • “It is universally accepted by the scientific community that any neutral particle such as the pion, kaon, neutron, gamma ray and cosmic ray, yields the same neutrino-like reaction inside a bubble chamber. It is universally accepted that it is necessary to install ‘shields’ or ‘filters’ to reduce the ‘background,’ that is, those particles, or penetrating radiation, that would yield the same neutrino-like reaction.” -Dr. Ricardo Carezani, physicist

  10. Neutrino Particle Zoo • Every decay case is different • Therefore special relativity will predict a different “energy” amount • Therefore you get a neutrino particle zoo which they continue to try and reduce (much like quarks)

  11. Neutrinos & Dissidents • I found the aether / gravity particle! • The mainstream had a hard time finding because aether / the graviton will be hard to find • The neutrino is proof that aether / the graviton exists! • I will convince the mainstream that my dissident theory is valid

  12. Ignored by Dissidents / Mainstream • Neutrino is the bastard son of special relativity • Mass increase is not observed in particle accelerators (Carezani at Sacramento) • If mass increase is not observed, then all of special relativity by concept is wrong • Kinematic equations + neutrino = zero, so why use a more complicated system? • Neutrino detectors are detecting false hits

  13. Neutrino does not exist • Reject the neutrino or you must accept that special relativity is correct • If you accept special relativity to be correct, then you have to ignore the fact that mass doesn’t increase – you must accept a paradox • If you closely look at the neutrino and its history with dissident eyes (with skeptic eyes), you will quickly conclude it is wrong, a mess, and a joke

  14. Do you still believe?

  15. Neutrino Oscillation (Wikipedia) • Neutrino oscillations are quantum mechanical phenomena predicted by Bruno Pontecorvo whereby a neutrino created with a specific lepton flavor (electron, muon or tau) can later be measured to have a different flavor. The probability of measuring a particular flavor for a neutrino varies periodically as it propagates. Neutrino oscillation is of theoretical and experimental interest since observation of the phenomenon implies that the neutrino has a non-zero mass, which is not part of the original Standard Model of particle physics.

  16. Neutrino is not Good for Your Theory • It goes through 100,000 years of lead without interaction • Not good for gravity particles • Not good for aether particles • They change in mid-air (oscillations) • How does that affect your theory? • Do all the neutrino properties purported by the mainstream fit your theory? • I doubt it because you most likely do not know them

  17. Call it “Something Else” • The universe works perfectly well without the neutrino just as it does without special relativity, the big bang, black holes, wormholes, a static mass / sized earth, etc… • Name your aether / gravity particle something else • Don’t pretend to be a dissident and say you accept the neutrino without studying it

  18. Damaging to Your Theory • Once it is accepted that neutrinos in fact do not exist, then where is your theory??? • Neutrino “Science” is where the dissident community and mainstream act in a non-scientific, illogical manner • When it comes to the neutrino, dissidents are no better at “science” than the mainstream • OUCH…

  19. Dedication • To Dr. Ricardo Libertad Carezani, Argentinean Physicist • My mentor and first teacher in the dissident sciences • Read his work • Special relativity cannot exist because frames do not exist in the physical world (there is only one 3-dimensional space and no frames) • Kinematic equations cannot be applied to decay cases • Autodynamic equations make common sense, not the special relativity equations

  20. I have been saying this for years.You have ears but do not hear.

More Related