1 / 9

Confidence in the Peruvian Government

Confidence in the Peruvian Government. Adam W. Gould ag6695b@student.american.edu American University School of International Service. Research Question & Research Hypothesis.

Download Presentation

Confidence in the Peruvian Government

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Confidence in the Peruvian Government Adam W. Gould ag6695b@student.american.edu American University School of International Service

  2. Research Question & Research Hypothesis • Research Question/s : What, if any, role do demographic variables such as age, gender, ethnicity, and income level have on the level of confidence in the government among Peruvians? • Ha: A statistically significant relationship exists between confidence in the government and independent variables (race, gender, age, and income level.) • Ho: No statistically significant relationship exists between confidence in the government and the independent variables.

  3. Background Info • Despite sound macroeconomic performance over the last few years, poverty and lack of engagement of the rural and indigenous population by the national government remains a tremendous problem. • Neoliberal reforms at the center of often violent debate over economic expansion vs. indigenous rights.

  4. Data • Unit of analysis : Individual • Source of the data: 2006 World Values Survey • The World values survey is conducted using a multi-stage cluster sample design, stratification by region, by urban and rural areas, and residence zones in Metropolitan Lima. • Sample size is 1,500 respondents. • Selection method meets EPSEM criteria, but cluster sampling is somewhat less reliable than simple random sample. • Dependent variable: Confidence (Ordinal) • 4-point scale of self-reported confidence in the government. • Independent Variable • X1: Race (by individual,) a nominal variable. • X2: Age (years,) an interval ratio variable • X3: Gender, a nominal variable • X4: Income level (Peruvian nuevo soles,) an ordinal variable.

  5. Descriptive Statistics Y: Range 1-4. For the dependent variable, the mode is 3, “Not very much.” The distribution of responses is not normal. X1: Range 1-6. Mode is 2, “Mixed Race”, with 830 responses out of 1,386. X2: Range 18-89. Mean age is 37.617 years, std. dev. 14.897. Mode is 25 years. Distribution is positively skewed. Median age of 54. X3: Range 0-1. Mode is 0,“Female.” X4: Range 1-9. Income level, mean is step 2.807, median is the 4th and 5th step. Distribution is positively skewed. Interpretation: Most Peruvians do not have much confidence in the government.

  6. Bivariate analysis

  7. Regression Analysis :Government Confidence (Y=1 Means “No Confidence”) • No model offers significant results once dependent variable is recoded to simple binary construction for probit.

  8. Had the Research Question Been Different… Y= Importance of Politics 0 =“Important” 1= “Not Important Income Level: Significant, negative relationship. Education: Significant, negative relationship. Model 2 is a fair predictive model of Y variable, with significant Z scores and not too many missing observations . *Relatively low R2 Values

  9. Findings & Policy Implications • Failed to reject the Null except in initial chi-squared test of X1. Therefore, no statistically significant relationships exist between the independent and dependent variables. • In the initial bivariate table, it appeared that Race and Confidence were associated, but this outcome was refuted in the Probit analysis (when measure of Confidence was recoded to 0=Confidence or 1= No Confidence.) • Policy Implications? • Note that the government confidence in the pie graph was very low, almost 90% reported “not much” or “none at all.” Survey respondents overall reported a very low level of confidence in the government. This could be a sign that the government is on its way out. • Recent events frustrating García administration.

More Related