1 / 26

Note Well

Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements

dorcas
Download Presentation

Note Well

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Note Well • Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC • and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements • include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, • which are addressed to: • The IETF plenary session • The IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG • Any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design • team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices • Any IETF working group or portion thereof • The IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB • The RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function • All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC 4879). • Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to • an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice. • Please consult RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 for details. • A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to accept all IETF rules of process, as documented in Best Current • Practices RFCs and IESG Statements. • A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges that written, audio and video records of meetings may be made • and may be available to the public.

  2. MPLS Working Group IETF 84 – Vancouver Monday, 09:00-11:30 Friday, 09:00-11:00

  3. Agenda Bashing - Admin • Please respect the time allocated to your presentation slot. • Fill in the Blue Sheets, and pass on. Return to WG Chairs • https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/84/agenda/mpls/

  4. The MPLS working group has now produced 100 RFCs

  5. WG Status • 2 New RFCs • RFC 6639Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) MIB-Based Management Overview • RFC 6669An Overview of the Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Toolset for MPLS-Based Transport Networks • RFC 6670 The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)) RFC 6670 was not a working group document, but may be of interest and has been made accessible from the MPLS WG home page.

  6. WG Status • WG Drafts in RFC-Editor’s queue • draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-gtsm (EDIT) • Document of interest in RFC-Editors queue • draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-04 (Waiting for ITU-T reference)

  7. WG Status • Drafts in IESG Processing • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design-02 • Publication Requested • draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework-04 • Publication Requested

  8. WG Status WG Drafts (on the agenda) draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-multi-topology draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ring-protection Discussion of deep label stacks Resulted from WG last call on draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-label

  9. WG Status WG Drafts (not on the agenda) I draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-label Shepherd write-up in progress draft-ietf-mpls-gach-adv WG Last call closed Waiting for update from authors draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping Ready for WG Last Call draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod Security section need to be improved Minor updates needed Authors expect to request WG Last Call before IETF 85 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6 WG Last Call closed Waiting for updates from the authors

  10. WG Status WG Drafts (not on the agenda) II draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf Waiting for updated version of CCAMP companion document draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-in-band-signaling Ready for IESG draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping WG Last Call closed Waiting for updates from the authors draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-mcast draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-mpls

  11. WG Status WG Drafts (not on the agenda) III draft-ietf-mpls-targeted-mldp Recently adopted as WG document, to be published draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ethernet-addressing WG Last Call closed Waiting for updates from authors draft-ietf-mpls-tp-itu-t-identifiers WG Last Call extended draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map Working on one outstanding issue draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib Recently adopted as WG document draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone Need some work

  12. WG Status WG Drafts (not on the agenda) IV draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework Publication Requested draft-ietf-mpls-tp-te-mib WG Last Call closed New version (-04) published Waiting for MiB Doctors to confirm the updates draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm Updated. New requirements incorporated draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design Publication Requested

  13. Liaison • Needed to answer to: Revision of Recommendation ITU-T G.8131 – Linear protection switching for MPLS-TP networks https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1162/ • Eric O and Yaacov W has helped the WG chairs to compile a response based on comments from several sources • This proposed response has been reviewed on the WG mailing list. Some late comments need to be responded to or worked into the text. • The response liaison will be sent this week

  14. WG Status Non WG Drafts I draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp In review prior to wg doc poll IPR call will be issued draft-allan-mpls-spme-smp-fmwk draft-allan-mpls-unified-ic-req-frmwk draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path draft-bashandy-mpls-ldp-bgp-frr MPLS or RTWGP? draft-chen-mpls-mldp-deployment-via-p2p-tunnels

  15. WG Status Non WG Drafts II draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-egress-protection On the agenda draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-ingress-protection On the agenda draft-cheung-mpls-tp-mesh-protection On hold until we have the SMP requirements draft-cui-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-id draft-cui-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-id draft-ezy-mpls-tp-1ton-protection Poll for adoption as working group document ends August 3rd draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework New version published Comments requested

  16. WG Status Non WG Drafts III draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-framework On the agenda draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-protection-switching draft-hmk-mpls-tp-p2mp-oam-framework On the agenda draft-iwijnand-mpls-mldp-multi-topology draft-jacquenet-mpls-rd-p2mp-te-requirements draft-jin-jounay-mpls-mldp-hsmp Being reviewed prior to call for adoption as working group document draft-jin-mpls-mldp-leaf-discovery Being reviewed prior to call for adoption as working group document

  17. WG Status Non WG Drafts IV draft-jjb-mpls-rsvp-te-hsmp-lsp Being reviewed prior to call for adoption as working group document draft-kini-mpls-frr-ldp RTGWG? draft-kompella-mpls-reserved-labels draft-li-mpls-ldp-mt-mib draft-liu-mpls-tp-interconnected-ring-protection draft-liu-mpls-tp-p2mp-shared-protection draft-lzj-mpls-receiver-driven-multicast-rsvp-te On the agenda

  18. WG Status Non WG Drafts V draft-manral-mpls-rsvpte-ipv6 draft-manral-mpls-tp-lmp-test draft-martinotti-mpls-unified-mpls-fwk Comments needed. draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv To be updated Call for wg adoption prior to IETF 85 draft-pan-shared-mesh-protection On hold waiting for SMP requirements draft-pdutta-mpls-ldp-adj-capability On the agenda draft-pdutta-mpls-ldp-v2

  19. WG Status Non WG Drafts VI draft-pdutta-mpls-multi-ldp-instance On the agenda draft-pdutta-mpls-tldp-hello-reduce MPLS-RT review draft-pelletier-mpls-ldp-bindings-refresh draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv Poll to become wg document ends Aug 7th draft-raza-mpls-ldp-olf draft-rekhter-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection

  20. WG Status Non WG Drafts VII draft-smiler-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib draft-tao-mpls-pim-interworking On the agenda draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection On the agenda draft-villamizar-mpls-tp-multipath draft-villamizar-mpls-tp-multipath-te-extn draft-weingarten-mpls-smp-requirements On the agenda draft-wijnands-mpls-mldp-node-protection Ready for poll to become wg doc

  21. WG Status Non WG Drafts VIII draft-xu-mpls-in-udp draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections draft-zheng-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth Poll for wg adoption ends July 31st draft-zjns-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply On the agenda draft-zlj-mpls-mrsvp-te-frr On the agenda RTGWG?

  22. The MPLS-RT Information We have a lot of WG drafts, and a lot more drafts waiting to be considered for adoption as WG drafts To work through the backlog while maintaining quality, WG chairs started an MPLS Review Team Status MPLS-RT was initially an experiment WG chairs found it very helpful and have decided to make it permanent. Members chosen for experience and knowledge, some are specialists in certain areas.

  23. The MPLS Review Team (MPLS-RT) MPLS-RT Charter review drafts to support the working group chairs, e.g.before polls on working group document status Respond to the following questions: is document coherent? is it useful? is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks? is technically sound? is ready to be considered for WG adoption? The working group chairs may request reviews in other situations

  24. The MPLS-RT process RT members have indicated specific areas of competence and interest Chairs request reviews by specific RT members Others (not on the team) may be asked to review some documents due to specific expertise Reviews sent to authors, MPLS list May be sent privately to chairs only This is a new process, we have not fully debugged all details

  25. The MPLS-RT members • Dave Allan • Thomas Beckhaus • Mach Chen • Joan Cucchiara • Nick DelRegno • Kenji Fujihira • Eric Gray • Jia He • Lizhong Jin • Markus Jork • Daniel King • Sriganesh Kiri • Nick Leymann • Greg Mirsky • Thomas Morin • Tom Nadeau • Eric Osborne • Kamran Raza • Raveendra Torvi • Yaacov Weingarten • Bert Wijnen • Jeremy Whittaker • Bo Wu • Vero Zheng

  26. Miscellaneous for Authors • Please Verify email addresses in drafts. • We quite often get bounces from the mail aliases for our drafts • Question: “Why do not all ‘mpls’ related drafts show up on the mpls WG page?” • The rule is that the filename shall be in this format: • draft-ietf-mpls-whatever-topic (if and only if WG document); or • draft-individual-mpls-whatever-topic (otherwise) • Constructs that will not work: • draft-individual1-indivdual2-mpls-topic; • draft-individual-my-mpls-draft • They are not “illegal”, but they will not show up on the mpls page!

More Related