1 / 23

Fiscal Federalism

Fiscal Federalism. Douglas Brown Pols 321 St. Francis Xavier University October 2009. Fiscal Federalism: The Search for Balance. The structure of Canadian fiscal federalism Fiscal Policy Consensus of the ’90s The Liberals and surplus federalism The Politics of Fiscal Imbalance

dyanne
Download Presentation

Fiscal Federalism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fiscal Federalism Douglas Brown Pols 321 St. Francis Xavier University October 2009

  2. Fiscal Federalism:The Search for Balance • The structure of Canadian fiscal federalism • Fiscal Policy Consensus of the ’90s • The Liberals and surplus federalism • The Politics of Fiscal Imbalance • 2007 Budget and Beyond • Evaluating Fiscal Federalism

  3. A. The Structure of Canadian Fiscal Federalism • Constitutional Powers • Tax Structure and Harmonization • Intergovernmental Transfers • Fiscal Relations Process

  4. 1. Constitutional Powers • The exclusive fields of provincial jurisdiction limit room for federal domination • But provincial autonomy can be compromised by the federal spending power • Both feds and provinces have access to important taxes

  5. 2. Tax structure and harmonization • Shared revenues: personal and corporate income tax, sales taxes, alcohol, tobacco and fuels • Tax collection agreements promote harmonization (erosion could harm economic union) • 1950-2005: gradual decentralization of fed-prov revenue split, from 65/35 to 44/56

  6. 3. Intergovernmental transfers • Vertical fiscal gaps: met with cash and tax transfers • Horizontal fiscal gaps: met by Equalization program, plus equalizing features of other transfers • The significance of the relative “unconditionality” of the system • Equalization is the key to sustaining provincial autonomy over time

  7. Côté

  8. 4. Fiscal relations process • Part of, and at the at heart of, the budget-making process • It is complex, technical, bureaucratic and secretive • Final decisions most often made by feds alone, with more or less consultation with the provinces and territories • Parliaments resist being bound by multi-year agreements

  9. B. Fiscal Policy Consensus of the 1990s • Economic globalization and liberalization – free trade as strategy; welfare state programs reformed • All governments eliminate deficits, some run big surpluses • Taxpayers trust government less, leads to tax cuts and tax reform • Acceptance of fiscal decentralization, less regional redistribution • Reaches climax in 1995 with cuts to the CHST and other programs

  10. C. The Liberals and the Politics of Surplus • Restoration and acceleration of the federal surplus, 1998 onwards • Direct spending initiatives: • Child tax benefit • Millennium Scholarships • Homelessness initiative • Gradual, ad-hoc, but eventually a substantial restoration of federal health transfer • 2000, 2003 and 2004 “Accords” • Equalization: saved from initial cuts, but later ways found to limit growth

  11. The Provincial Backlash • 1995 Premiers Council on Social Policy Renewal argues for restoring funding cuts • 2002 Séguin (Quebec) report claims there is a vertical fiscal imbalance (VFI) • 2003 Council of the Federation: reaching a common front on VFI • But common front not easily maintained: • Richer provinces seek equal per capita CHST shares • NL and NS offshore accords, 2004-05

  12. D. The Fiscal Balance debate • Is it a fiscal imbalance or a fiscal gap? • Vertical vs. horizontal balance? • Chronic or transitory phenomenon? • Structural problem or reflecting political preferences? • Solutions: -- rebalance roles? transfer more cash? or transfer tax room? • Transferring room for what? • Tax cuts or spending increases?

  13. Recap of situation, end of 2005 • 10-year agreement on health care…but provinces feel they are not out of woods on increasing costs • Equalization and TFF: cash payments fixed, and decoupled from any formula rationale • Separate CST agreement, with potential to be the next candidate for renewal and expansion • Childcare: bilateral agreements reached • Growing disequilibrium with Alberta oil surplus

  14. The Harper Conservatives: Budget Paper, 2006 • Confirms Martin’s 10-year plan on health care, and for this year, status quo on EQ and TFF • Acknowledges a VFI exists • Open to idea of a tax transfer • Wants long-term framework for PSE and training • Seeks a transparent, principle-based EQ • Seeks greater tax harmonization • Launches a one-year multi-table intergovernmental and consultative process

  15. E. Federal Budget 2007 • Equalization seen as major way to fix vertical fiscal imbalance • Major reform of equalization: • 10 province standard plus 50 percent inclusion of resource revenues = more money • Transparency, stability, predictability • But …new ”Cap” on fiscal capacity is punitive to new resource producers: Sask, NL and NS

  16. The Dilemma of the Offshore Accords …1 • Original accords, 1986, were a quasi-constitutional solution to a difficult dispute over ownership, management and revenues. • 2005 amendments aimed to restore 1986 intent that NL and NS should be “principal fiscal beneficiaries”. • Proposed as a solution when equalization seemed in trouble. • Not welcomed by other provinces, seen as distorting of equalization principles.

  17. The Dilemma of the Offshore Accords …2 • Competing rhetorical claims of “fairness” • Ontario: no EQ recipient’s fiscal capacity should be higher than ours as a result of side deals. • NS, NL, SK: oil and gas are depleting provincial assets, not just revenues, and are key to achieving a measure of regional equity. • NL and NS invoke constitutional principle of promoting regional economic development to justify their position that offshore accords should not be breached.

  18. Fiscal Federalism and the Economic Down-turn, 2008-09 • Back to deficit financing for both feds and provs • A lingering public-sector recession is likely • A temporary (?) dip in oil and gas and other resource revenues • Equalization entitlements bound to change • Is Ontario a have-not province?

  19. F. Evaluation: The effects of Fiscal Federalism (1) • On the performance of the federation • Over the long term it contributes flexibility and a respect for federal values • But the system has proven less adaptable in recent years • Intergovernmental culture is now more combative (politicians get involved more) • The public’s sense of stability has suffered

  20. Evaluation: The effect of Fiscal Federalism (2) • On reaching policy goals • Major economic goals achieved, with strong economic performance in past decade • Equalization and TFF have proven effective according to their objectives • Social program transfer programs less effective – fiscal relations do not promote reform in areas such as health care

  21. Evaluation: The effect of Fiscal Federalism (3) • On democratic legitimacy • Erosion of intergovernmental trust in past decade • Feds seen as “unapologetic unilateralist” (Stein-Gagne report, 2006) • Increasing commitment to accountability, transparency and public communication

More Related