1 / 18

Chaos and its Computing Paradigm

Chaos and its Computing Paradigm. By: Kellen Dale and Joel Martinez. History. Started as mathematical study Originated at MIT Around 1960. Chaos Revealed. Chaos has three defining characteristics: Extreme sensitivity to initial conditions It has aperiodic long-term behavior

edmund
Download Presentation

Chaos and its Computing Paradigm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chaos and its Computing Paradigm By: Kellen Dale and Joel Martinez

  2. History • Started as mathematical study • Originated at MIT • Around 1960

  3. Chaos Revealed Chaos has three defining characteristics: • Extreme sensitivity to initial conditions • It has aperiodic long-term behavior • It is completely deterministic

  4. The Butterfly Effect “The flapping of a single butterfly’s wings today produces a tiny change in the state of the atmosphere. Over a period of time, what the atmosphere actually does diverges from what it would have done. So, in a month’s time, a tornado that would have devastated the Indonesian coast doesn’t happen. Or maybe on that wasn’t going to happen, does.” • Ian Stewart, Does God Play Dice? The Mathematics of Chaos, pg.141

  5. COME ON DOWN!! • Plinko • Does it follow the defining characteristics? • Dependent on initial conditions? • Aperiodic? • Deterministic?

  6. Example of a Chaotic System • Logistic Map • Used as a population model • xn+1 = rxn(1-xn) • ‘r’ is a positive constant • ‘Xn’ denotes growth as a result of reproduction (between 0 and 1) • ‘(1- Xn)’ represents the loss due to death

  7. Generating Data double lambda = 4; double xNext = 0.5999999; //used .6 and .60000001 int iteration = 0; fout.open(“output.txt”); for(int j = 0; j < 51; j++){ for(int i = 0; i < iteration; i++){ xNext = lambda*xNext*(1 - xNext); } fout << xNext << endl; xNext = 0.5999999;//change to use .6 and .60000001 iteration += 1; }

  8. Visualizing the Logistic Map

  9. Computing with Chaos • How do we perform a computation with a choatic system? • Basic logic operations (AND, OR, XOR, NAND…) with chaotic elements

  10. Interpreted to Actual Values • Interpreted Values of AND • (I1,I2,O) • (0,0,0) (0,1,0) (1,0,0) (1,1,1) • Actual values • (X1,X2,Z) • (interpreted -> actual), (0<->0) (1<->δ) • (0,0,0) (0, δ,0) (δ,0,0) (δ, δ, δ)

  11. Output Given a Threshold Value • Chaotic element output based on a threshold value represented as x* • If f(x) ≤ x*, no output, i.e. Z= 0 (false) • Otherwise, Z = δ (true) = f(x) – x* is outputted • Using these characteristics in combination with the chaotic behavior of f(x) we implement the AND operator in three steps.

  12. Three Steps • Step 1 • Initialization of x0 and input of external values • x = x0 + X1 + X2 for the AND operator • Step 2 • Chaotic update: x -> f(x), where f(x) is our chaotic function • Step 3 • Threshold mechanism to get output, ‘Z’ • Z = 0 (false) if f(x) ≤ x* • Z = δ (true) = f(x) – x*, if f(x) > x*

  13. Choosing Parameters • Need three parameters δ, x0, and x* that are consistent with the three steps in order to achieve the required input-to-output mapping. • Z=AND(X1,X2) • Four possible combos, (0,0), (0, δ), (δ ,0), (δ,δ)

  14. x = x0 + X1 + X2 • Case 1 • Both X1, X2 are 0: x0 + 0 + 0 = x0 • Chaotic update, f(x0) • We know Z (output) should be 0, so we have f(x0) ≤ x* • Case 2 • One of X1,X2 is 0: x0 + 0 + δ => x0 + δ • Chaotic update, f(x0 + δ) • We know Z should be 0, we have f(x0 + δ) ≤ x* • Case 3 • Both X1,X2 are δ: x0+ δ + δ => x0 + 2 δ • Chaotic update, f(x0 + 2 δ) • We know Z should be δ, we can say f(x0 + 2 δ) > x* • We know this update produces a true value, thus by subtracting x* from our derivation above we arrive at: f(x0 + 2 δ) - x* = δ

  15. Additional Operators

  16. Example - f(x) = rx(1-x), 0 < r ≤ 4 • r = 4, δ = ¼, x0 = 0, x* = ¾ Three Cases in use: (1) f(x0) = f (0) = 0 ≤ ¾ = x* (2) f(x0 + δ) = f (1/4) = ¾ ≤ x* (3) f(x0 + 2 δ) – x* = f (1/2) – ¾ = 1 -3/4 = ¼ = δ

  17. Advantages • Threshold Changes • Different Circuits on same hardware • Data Transfer • More dynamic • Faster

  18. Future/Current Uses • Artificial Intelligence • Internet Uses • Operating Systems • Data Transmission

More Related