1 / 30

METHODS OF ASSESSMENT IN SPECIAL EDUCATION

METHODS OF ASSESSMENT IN SPECIAL EDUCATION. DR. GEORGE GIULIANI HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY SPED 242. Definition of Assessment. Definition of Assessment: Assessment in special education is a process that involves collecting information about a student for the purpose of making decisions .

Download Presentation

METHODS OF ASSESSMENT IN SPECIAL EDUCATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. METHODS OF ASSESSMENT IN SPECIAL EDUCATION DR. GEORGE GIULIANI HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY SPED 242

  2. Definition of Assessment • Definition of Assessment: Assessment in special education is a process that involves collecting information about a student for the purpose of making decisions. • Assessment is primarily a problem-solving process • Process: A series of actions that bringing about a result. • e.g., the “process” of becoming a teacher; the “process” of making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich

  3. METHODS OF ASSESSMENT USED IN SPECIAL EDUCATION • OBSERVATIONS • Observation: An assessment technique whereby one observes the student in his or her natural environments. • Observing the student and his or her environment is an important part of any assessment process.

  4. Observations • Observations in the classroom and in other settings where the student operates can provide valuable information about: • Academic skills • Motor/Physical skills • Communication skills • Social skills • Management skills

  5. Two Types of Observations • 1. Nonsystematic observation: Observer simply watches the observer in his or environment and notes the behaviors, characteristics, and personal interactions that seem significant. (see slides on anecdotal recording) • 2. Systematic Observation: Here, the observer sets out to observe one or more precisely defined behaviors. The observer specifies observable events that define the behavior and then measures the behavior in a certain way. (see slides on event recording and duration recording)

  6. Common Observational Techniques • 1. Anecdotal Recording:The observer describes incidents or behaviors observed in a particular setting in concrete, narrative terms (as opposed to drawing inferences about feelings or motives). • This type of record allows insight into cause and effect by detailing what occurred before a behavior took place, the behavior itself, and consequences or events that occurred after the behavior.

  7. Anecdotal Recording • Anecdotal Recording allows us to look at the: A-B-C • A = Antecedent • B = Behavior • C = Consequence

  8. Common Observational Techniques • 2. Event Recording:The observer is interested in recording the number of times a specific behavioral event occurred (such as how many times the student hits or gets out of his or her seat). • A tally sheet listing the behaviors to be observed and counted is useful; when the observer sees the behavior of interest, he or she can simply make a tick mark on the sheet. • 3. Duration Recording:This method requires a watch or clock, so that a precise measurement of how much time a student spends doing something of concern to the teacher or assessment team (e.g., talking to others, tapping, rocking) can be recorded.

  9. Observations • Advantages-Get to see spontaneous behavior • Disadvantages- • (1) No control over the situations • (2) Observer Bias

  10. Observation Bias • One source of error may come from the observer -- he or she must record accurately, systematically, and without bias. • If his or her general impression of the student influences how he or she rates that student in regards to specific characteristics, the data will be misleading and inaccurate. • This can be especially true if the student comes from a background that is different from the majority culture. • In such cases, it is important that the observer have an understanding of, and a lack of bias regarding, the student's cultural or language group.

  11. ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT • When observing the child in many different environments, you are conducting an Ecological Assessment • Ecological assessment involves directly observing and assessing the child in the many environments in which he or she routinely operates. • The purpose of conducting such an assessment is to probe how the different environments influence the student and his or her school performance.

  12. INTERVIEWS • Interview: An assessment technique conducted face to face (or by telephone) between an interviewer and an interviewee where recorded responses to questions are obtained.

  13. Two Types of Interviews • Structured Interview:Interview whereby a predetermined set of questions is asked • Unstructured Interview:Interview where no predetermined questions are asked • Most interviews combine both structured and unstructured interview questions

  14. Advantages of an Interview • Personal • Emotional • Flexible

  15. Disadvantages of an Interview • Time consuming • “Costly” • Rapport between interviewer and interviewee • Concerns with student’s language ability

  16. INTERVIEWS • Interviewing the student in question, his or her parents, teachers, and other adults or peers can provide a great deal of useful information about the student. • Ultimately, an interview should be a conversation with a purpose with questions designed to collect information that relates to the observed or suspected disability of the child

  17. PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENTS • Often, an initial part of the assessment process includes examining a student's work, either by selecting work samples that can be analyzed to identify academic skills and deficits, or by conducting a portfolio assessment, where folders of the student's work are examined.

  18. PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENTS • Perhaps the most important type of assessment for the classroom teacher is the portfolio assessment. • A portfolio is “a purposeful collection of student works that exhibits the student’s efforts, progress, and achievement in one or more areas.”

  19. Three General Types of Portfolios • 1. Working portfolio- Teacher, student, and parents all contribute to the portfolio. Both works-in-progress and final product pieces are included.

  20. Three General Types of Portfolios • 2. Showcase portfolio- The portfolio houses only the student’s best work and generally does not include works-in-progress. The student manages the portfolio and decides what to place in it. • 3. Record keeping or Teacher portfolio- The portfolio houses student test papers and work samples maintained by the teacher. It contains work not selected by the student for inclusion in the showcase portfolio.

  21. TEST • Test:A set of questions or tasks administered to an individual to determine knowledge or skills. The results are reported in one or more types of scores.

  22. VALIDITY • Validity is the most essential quality needed in a measuring instrument. • Validity denotes the extent to which an instrument is measuring what it is supposed to measure. • Obviously, if an instrument is not producing the information that it is supposed to, it is essentially worthless.

  23. VALIDITY • The greater the validity of a test, the greater our confidence that it measures what it is designed to measure. • Questions about validity are of ultimate importance for special educators because it addresses whether an instrument fulfills the function for which it was created.

  24. Reliability • Reliabilityrefers to the consistency of measurements. • In assessment, reliability relates to the confidence in an instrument to give the same score for a student if the test were given more than once. • A reliable test produces similar scores across various conditions and situations, including different evaluators and testing environments.

  25. Norm-Referenced Tests • A norm-referenced test, also known as an NRT, is designed to compare student performance to that of other students. • In special education, almost every norm-referenced test compares an individual student’s score against national averages.

  26. Norm-Referenced Tests • Scores on norm-referenced tests are not interpreted according to an absolute standard or criterion (i.e., 8 out of 10 correct) but, rather, according to how the student's performance compares with that of a particular group of individuals.

  27. Standardization • All norm-referenced tests include standardized procedures. • Standardization:Refers to structuring test materials, administration procedures, scoring methods, and techniques for interpreting results. • By standardizing the test it means that all children are receiving the same questions and procedures, no matter where it is being administered.

  28. Standardization • Standardized tests are very much a part of the education scene. Most of us have taken many such tests in our lifetime. • There is a wide variety of standardized tests available to assess different skill areas. • In the field of special education, these include intelligence tests, math, reading, spelling and writing tests, perceptual tests and many others.

  29. Criterion-Referenced Tests • Criterion referenced tests (CRTs) are scored according to a standard, or criterion, that the teacher, school, or test publisher decides represents an acceptable level of mastery. • The test giver is interested what the student can and cannot do, rather than how his or her performance compares with those of other people.

  30. Criterion-Referenced Tests • Mastery-a level of performance on a criterion-referenced test that shows that a student has demonstrated the knowledge, skills, and abilities for a unit of instruction or subject area as defined by a predetermined standard. • CRT are more concerned with “describing what a student can do” rather than “comparing” her performance to others.

More Related