1 / 9

Open Monograph Press

Open Monograph Press. Leah Hopton LIBR 559 June 7, 2011. In defense of the monograph…. Scholarly Monograph in danger So why fight for monograph publishing? Presents a full, developed concept ( Willinsky , 2009)

elia
Download Presentation

Open Monograph Press

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Open Monograph Press Leah Hopton LIBR 559 June 7, 2011

  2. In defense of the monograph… • Scholarly Monograph in danger • So why fight for monograph publishing? • Presents a full, developed concept (Willinsky, 2009) • Putting a limit on monographs “restrict[s], in effect, what is studied” (Willinsky, 2009, para. 8) • What’s your role? • Future librarian: educate scholars on Open Monograph Press • Future Advocate: promote academic freedom • Future Author: Lead by example

  3. Press… with benefits • What is the Open Monograph Press? • An online workspace (like OJS) • Not necessarily Open Access, but has that potential • Benefits: • Reduced costs (Willinsky, 2009) • Freely available to the academic community (the software AND the information produced) (Willinsky 2009) • Supports print or electronic formats (Willinsky, 2009) • Low cost provides more opportunities for developing countries (Willinsky, 2009; Geiser, 2010)

  4. The process + a twist

  5. But wait… there’s more!

  6. Where libraries can help… • Willinsky (2008): • Libraries can act as partners in seeking grants • Support projects by ordering print and electronic versions in advance • Provide funding for OA (create an “endowed monograph series”) • Defray costs by hosting software; providing support • Shearer (2010): • Libraries are hosting OJS ~ considering OMP as possible next step

  7. Caveats Not completely “free” Promotion and tenure issues More writing = poor writing? Photo by evita2005, available under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License

  8. References Geiser, K. (2010, January 26). Freeing knowledge. The Stanford Daily. Retrieved from http://suse-ldt.stanford.edu/news/freeing-knowledge Open Monograph Press. Retrieved from http://pkp.sfu.ca/omp Shearer, K. (2010). A review of emerging models in Canadian academic publishing. Retrieved from https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/24008. Steele, C. (2008). Scholarly monograph publishing in the 21st century: The future more than ever should be an open book. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(2) doi:10.3998/3336451.0011.201 (free version available at http://tinyurl.com/4xn2pgw) Willinsky, J. (2008). Monograph funding. Retrieved from http://pkp.sfu.ca/node/1599 Willinsky, J. (2009). Toward the design of an open monograph press. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 12(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0012.103 (free version available at http://tinyurl.com/3skzwkt)

  9. John Willinsky Photo by D’arcy Norman, available under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License.

More Related