1 / 27

Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Annual Update Adoption Public Hearing April 5, 2011

Board of County Commissioners. Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Annual Update Adoption Public Hearing April 5, 2011. Presentation Outline. Overview Legislative Requirements 2010-2011 CIE Update Summary Policy Amendments Interlocal Agreement Requested Action. Presentation Outline.

ellis
Download Presentation

Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Annual Update Adoption Public Hearing April 5, 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Board of County Commissioners Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Annual Update Adoption Public Hearing April 5, 2011

  2. Presentation Outline • Overview • Legislative Requirements • 2010-2011 CIE Update • Summary • Policy Amendments • Interlocal Agreement • Requested Action

  3. Presentation Outline • Overview • Legislative Requirements • 2020-2011 CIE Update • Summary • Policy Amendments • Interlocal Agreement • Requested Action

  4. Overview • Capital Improvements Element • Required element in the Comprehensive Plan • Designed to consider the need for, and location and timing of, public facilities • Ensures public facilities will be available and adequate to provide acceptable levels of service (LOS) • Ensures that the Comprehensive Plan is financially feasible

  5. Overview • Concurrency • The premise of concurrency is that public facilities and services will be available concurrent with the impacts of development • Local government sets LOS standards, and concurrency ensures that those LOS standards will be achieved and maintained

  6. Overview • Level of Service (LOS) Standards • Identified for concurrency-related facilities • Parks and recreation • Roads • Schools • Solid waste • Stormwater • Water and wastewater • Provide a quantitative tool to analyze the impacts of land use changes

  7. Overview • Financial Feasibility • Must demonstrate ability to achieve and maintain adopted LOS standards • For any facilities required to achieve LOS: • Projects in FY1-FY3 must be funded through a committed funding source • Projects in FY4-FY5 may be funded by committed or planned sources

  8. Overview • Funding Sources • Committed funding source: An existing source and amount of revenue presently available to a local government • Planned funding source: A revenue source not currently available, such as a potential grant

  9. Overview • Capital Improvements Element • Includes • Location and timing of needed facilities • Principles for construction, extension or increase in facility capacity • Principles for correcting existing deficiencies • Estimated costs and projected revenue sources • A capital improvements schedule (CIS) that ensures that adopted LOS standards are achieved and maintained

  10. Overview • Capital Improvements Element • Data and Analysis • Goals, Objectives and Policies • Capital Improvements Schedules

  11. Overview • Capital Improvements Element • Data and Analysis • Projected public facility demand • Levels of service for public facilities • Summary of revenues and expenditures • Identification of any deficiencies

  12. Overview • Capital Improvements Element • Goals, Objectives and Policies • Plan for and manage public facilities to adequately serve existing and new residents • Require maintenance of adopted LOS standards • Coordinate development approval with the Capital Improvements Program • Require future development to bear its fair share cost for facility improvements • Maintain a Concurrency Management System

  13. Overview • Capital Improvements Element • Schedules • For each concurrency-related facility • Capital Improvements Schedule • 10-Year Facilities Work Plan • OCPS District Capital Outlay Plan • Long Term Concurrency Management Systems (LTCMS)

  14. Presentation Outline • Overview • Legislative Requirements • 2020-2011 CIE Update • Summary • Policy Amendments • Interlocal Agreement • Requested Action

  15. Legislative Requirements • 2005 Growth Management Legislation • Enacted penalties for not adopting an annual update of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) by December 2008 • CIE and Capital Improvements Schedule (CIS) must demonstrate financial feasibility

  16. Legislative Requirements • 2009 Growth Management Legislation • Delayed the CIE requirements to December 2011 • County’s update continued to meet the financial feasibility standards during the grace period • Department of Community Affairs (DCA) currently reviews CIE under the guidelines provided in 2009

  17. Legislative Requirements • 2011 Legislative Proposals • Further delay annual update requirement to 2013 • Remove financial feasibility requirement • Allow annual adoption at local level (no state review) • Remove state-mandated concurrency for transportation, schools and parks

  18. Presentation Outline • Overview • Legislative Requirements • 2010-2011 CIE Update • Summary • Policy Amendments • Interlocal Agreement • Requested Action

  19. 2010-2011 CIE Update • Summary • Few changes from the 2009-2010 CIE Update • Identified deficiencies have been addressed by policy or with projects included on the CIS • Deficient roads or schools have been included in Long Term Concurrency Management Systems (LTCMS)

  20. 2010-2011 CIE Update • Summary • Revised the list of backlogged Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs) for schools • Backlogged CSAs previously identified will meet LOS by 2017; backlogged CSAs added this year must meet LOS by 2020 • Backlogged CSAs are addressed in the OCPS District Work Plan

  21. 2010-2011 CIE Update • Policy Amendments • CIE1.1.13: Updates reference to the CIP • CIE 1.3.11: Adds language indicating that projected school LOS information and CSA boundary maps are provided annually by OCPS • CIE 1.3.14: Updates reference to the OCPS District Capital Outlay Plan

  22. 2010-2011 CIE Update • Policy Amendments • CIE1.3.18: Creates a separate LTCMS for additional backlogged CSAs • PS6.1.1: Clarifies language related to the LTCMS for schools • PS6.1.11: Clarifies that CSA boundaries are reviewed annually with the CIE update

  23. 2010-2011 CIE Update • First Amended and Restated School Interlocal Agreement (ILA) • Revises ILA provision requiring an ILA amendment for modifications to CSAs and LTCMS • Adds language stating that such changes can be made solely by amending the Comprehensive Plan • These revisions were coordinated with DCA, DOE, OCPS and affected municipalities

  24. 2010-2011 CIE Update • Timeline • LPA Adoption November 18, 2010 • BCC Adoption April 5, 2011 • DCA NOI Late May, 2011

  25. Presentation Outline • Overview • Legislative Requirements • 2010-2011 CIE Update • Summary • Policy Amendments • Interlocal Agreement • Requested Action

  26. Action Requested • Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and adopt Amendment 2011-1-B-CIE-1 (the annual CIE update), which includes amendments to the Capital Improvements and Public School Facilities elements • Approve the First Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and Implementation of Concurrency

  27. Board of County Commissioners Capital Improvements Element Annual Update Adoption Public Hearing April 5, 2011

More Related