1 / 33

ITER and Fusion Safety Aspects

ITER and Fusion Safety Aspects. H.-W. Bartels, ITER Prague, 13.November 2006. Fusion and nuclear safety. D. He-4. + 17.6 MeV. T. n. ==> nuclear safety related issues: 1) radioactivity of tritium (~5 kg in reactor) 2) activation from 14 MeV neutrons (~1/2 of activity of PWR). Tritium.

franz
Download Presentation

ITER and Fusion Safety Aspects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ITER and Fusion Safety Aspects H.-W. Bartels, ITER Prague, 13.November 2006

  2. Fusion and nuclear safety D He-4 + 17.6 MeV T n ==> nuclear safety related issues: 1) radioactivity of tritium (~5 kg in reactor) 2) activation from 14 MeV neutrons (~1/2 of activity of PWR)

  3. Tritium • Tritium in human body: • fast component t1/2 ~10 days • slow component t1/2 ~ 30 – 300 d • (organically bound tritium) • Half-life: 12.3 a • ß—radiator: <Ee-> = 5.7 keV • range organic matter: 6 µm • Horny layer skin: 70 µm Incorporation: • Inhalation, skin absorption, • Ingestion Very Mobile: HTO, HT Biological half-life:~10 days • Hazard/Bq: tritium <1000*Cs137

  4. Activation Products Neutron activation in some elements (5 MW/m2 in 2.5 years) Problematic isotopes: steel: 60Co: t1/2 ~ 5 years 1.2 MeV g-radiation tungsten: 185W: t1/2 ~ 75 days 0.4 MeV b-radiation Favorable elements: - Vanadium (V) - Chromium (Cr) - Titanium (Ti)

  5. Schematic Fusion Reactor Build-up

  6. ALARA principle lower project release limits Tritium 1 g/a Activated dust 10 g/a Corrosion products 50 g/a Dose limits: vary by country: 0.1-5 mSv/a average natural dose: 2 mSv/a Doses < 1% of natural dose Technical precedence used: tritium plants chemical plants (beryllium) fission reactors (esp. CANDU’s) tokamak (D_T: JET, TFTR) Analysis for last year ITER shielding blanket operation Initial releases small: limited use of tritium low level of activation time delay permeation of tritium into coolant Normal operational effluents

  7. Accidents:Design guideline atmospheric release Ultimate safety margin: Evacuation threshold for ground level releases: Tritium: < 100 g Tungsten dust: < 4 kg

  8. Accidents: Energy Sources

  9. Schematics of computer model for integrated accident analysis

  10. Accidents: Pressurization and decay heat In-vessel decay heat driven temperature transient • Accident scenario: • multiple FW failure  • all FW cooling pipes in two toroidal rings damaged  • fast pressurization plasma chamber • pressure limited by suppression system • Maximum pressure ITER: 2 bar • no in-vessel cooling VV cooled by natural circulation

  11. H2 + air explosion Accidents: Hydrogen in ITER H2 formation in fusion: chemical reactions with hot plasma facing components, e.g.: Be + H2O  BeO + H2 Combustion wave propagates ~2000 m/s Pressures from 15 to 20 bar

  12. Accident: Loss of coolant w/o shutdown

  13. 40 kg-H2 20 Accident: Loss of coolant w/o shutdown Ex-vessel LOCA w/o plasma shutdown • In case of on-going plasma burn temperature increase in affected components. • failure of in-vessel components at elevated temperatures • ingress of steam into VV • Be/steam chemical reactions • hazard of hydrogen formation • bypass 1. confinement barrier • ==> plasma burn will be terminated by fusion shutdown system

  14. Accident analysis margins • Large margins maintained because: • limitation of radioactive inventories; • inherent plasma termination processes; • long time for component heat-up; • gross structural melting impossible; • multiple layers and lines of defense to implement radioactive confinement; • design tolerant to safety system failures • Maximum doses < 2 mSv (annual natural dose) • ITER accident analysis has confirmed safety potential of Fusion Energy.

  15. Accident: Wet bypass • Hypothetical event: • loss of coolant plus 2 failures in one heating or diagnostic line (“wet bypass”) • Analysis results: • plasma chamber pressurizes • opening bypass / suppression tank • transport radioactivity into room • capture tritium, dust in tank, settling of dust by gravity, condensation of HTO in room • cleaning of room after 8 hours: •  ~15 g tritium released

  16. Accidents: Loss of cooling Fusion Reactor

  17. Is it true ? • V&V: verification & validation • verification • correct coding • comparison between different codes and performers • validation • comparison codes / data

  18. Verification thermo-hydraulic codes • Two codes used in ITER: • MELCOR (US) • INTRA (EU) • benchmark: large loss of cooling accident in ITER vacuum vessel • initially some differences, but both below design pressure 5 bar • differences could be explained by different treatment of mixed flow of steam and water • ==> feedback to design: lower pressures for separation of phases, e.g. pressure suppression system on top of vacuum vessel

  19. Validation experiments steam vacuum

  20. Validation thermo-hydraulic codes • Two codes used for ITER: • MELCOR (US) • INTRA (EU) • Comparison of code results with experimental data of water injection into vacuum vessel • Problem is scaling: length 1/10 of ITER • ==> larger surface/volume

  21. H 2 O R S S 3 1 6 S S 3 1 6 B e W alloy SS316 or Copper Support Z B e a m D u c t ( 1 6 0 x 8 0 ) # 1 D - T S o u r c e 600 400 382.4 1 0 1 . 6 2 0 3 . 2 6 0 9 . 8 6 6 0 . 4 5 0 . 8 14 MeV n-Source Experiment

  22. Fusion Neutron Source (FNS)

  23. ITER Decay Heat R&D -International code validation effort: - Uncertainties < 15% - 14 MeV n-irradiation at FNS at JAERI - Decay heat measurement: sum of ß,g radiation Cu, 7 hours irradiation SS-316, 7 hours irradiation

  24. JA dust mobilization experiments

  25. Russian hydrogen detonation experiments

  26. What if it is not true ?

  27. ”No-evacuation” limit and cliff-edge effects • Release assumptions: ground level, duration 1 h, worst case weather • No-evacuation limit (early dose):IAEA, ITER: 50 mSv • ITER “no-evacuation” limit met for tritium release < 90 g, in HTO form • No cliff-edge effect for tritium(For a hypothetical tritium release of 1 kg no-evacuation limit exceeded for < 1 km2) Area [km2]

  28. Long term contamination Tritium concentration in soil after contamination

  29. Waste volumes fusion reactor • Fusion optimized materials: • V-alloys • steel without Ni, Co • impurities need careful attention (Nb, Ag, Co, U) • Significant part (~30%) of activated material can be cleared • Volume ~1-2 x larger than fission waste (not counting U-mining~1.5 Mm3) • large fractions could be recycled

  30. No burden to future generations

  31. Conclusion • Normal operation • dose < 1% of natural background • Accidents • source term ~ 1000 times smaller compared to fission • if properly designed: no destruction due to internal accidents • large reactions times • tritium and dust largest hazard >> allowable releases • Waste • volumes comparable (~2 * larger) compared to fission • toxicity 1000 times smaller compared to fission • recycling might be feasible • Safety and environmental features dependent on design

  32. Other fusion reactions (1a) D + D  3He + n + 3.3 MeV (1b) D+D  T + p + 4.0 MeV (2a) D + 3He  4He + p + 18.4 MeV (2b) D + T  4He + n + 17.6 MeV (3) p + 11B  3 * 4He + 8.7 MeV (4) p + 6Li  3He + 4He + 3.9 MeV Equations (1a) – (2b) can be summarized as 3D  4He + p + n + 21.6 MeV D in water ~3.3*e-5  energy content 1 liter water ~ 350 l gasoline

  33. Advantages of fusion • No radioactive raw material • No chain reactions (small amount of fuel ~1 g in plasma) • Moderate decay heat (large surfaces) • Low biological toxicity and half-life time of activation products • Generates no greenhouse gases (no SO2, NOx)

More Related