1 / 18

Can fund managers asset allocate? Andrew Clare, Dirk Nitzsche

Can fund managers asset allocate? Andrew Clare, Dirk Nitzsche & Meadhbh Sherman Centre for Asset Management Research, Cass Business School, London. Overview. What we are assessing are TAA skills Previous, related work

gali
Download Presentation

Can fund managers asset allocate? Andrew Clare, Dirk Nitzsche

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Can fund managers asset allocate? Andrew Clare, Dirk Nitzsche & Meadhbh Sherman Centre for Asset Management Research, Cass Business School, London.

  2. Overview • What we are assessing are TAA skills • Previous, related work • Data & methodologies • Sub-set of results • Summary • All the results are preliminary; final version of paper should be available in September; also in process of updating the results

  3. Some previous work in this area • Sharpe (1988, 1992) asserted that: • a fund’s asset allocation decisions account for almost all of its fund’s performance • Brinson, Hood and Beebower (1986) examine the performance of 91 US pension funds using data from 1974 to 1983 they found that: • the policy mix explained 93.6 percent of the average fund’s return variation over time (as measured by the R2) • Brinson, Singer and Beebower (1991) quarterly returns data on 82 US pension funds spanning the period 1977 to 1987 • active investment decisions did little to improve portfolio performance because any abnormal performance was insignificant

  4. Some previous work in this area • Using UK pension fund data, Blake, Lehmann & Timmerman (1999) • the majority of return is derived from the strategic asset allocation decision • Using data on large Canadian and US pension funds Andonov et al (2011) find: • that changes in asset allocation, market timing and security selection generate positive abnormal returns of 17, 27 and 45 basis points per year respectively • Using a small sample of US managers Weigel (1991) finds that • the vast majority (over 75%) of managers exhibit positive, significant market timing ability • managers that are good at market timing are paying for this skill in the form of negative returns to non-market-timing strategies

  5. Data • We collected monthly, net of fee returns data on multi-asset class retail funds managed in Canada, the UK and the USA • Data sample is January 2000 to December 2010 – 714 funds • We also collected data on monthly proportions of multi asset class funds invested in: Cash, Govt bonds, Corporate bonds & Equities • Data sample is January 2006 to December 2010 – 355 funds • We use the two data sets as the basis for two approaches to the problem

  6. The multi-asset class funds

  7. Methodology • We apply variants of two methodologies to determine whether fund managers can ‘time’ their asset allocation decisions • We effectively test for tactical rather than strategic timing abilities • Methodology 1: • This is based on the “conditional beta” approach which imputes timing ability using fund returns (Ferson and Schadt (1996)): • We use several variants of this approach on the longer data set

  8. Methodology 1 • If θ2 is positive it implies successful timing of equity market • If θ3 is positive it implies successful timing of corp bond market • If θ4 is positive it implies successful timing of govt bond market • If θ5 is positive it implies successful timing of cash

  9. Results – US and UK Timing coefficients • Corporate bond timing more prevalent than equity market timing • UK Cautious Managed, can’t seem to time cash!

  10. Results – Canada Timing coefficients • Bond timing more prevalent than equity market timing for Canadian funds • However, overall proportion that are found to have significant timing ability in all three markets is very low.

  11. Results – summary • Arguably Canadian managers are the better tactical asset allocators

  12. Methodology 2 %ACj,t = α + βjRj,t+1) + εj,t • This approach is much simpler and much more direct, than the returns-based approach • It asks whether weightings rise/fall in proportion to market returns • A positive value for β indicates that it does • Again, we use a number of variants of this approach

  13. Timing the equity market

  14. Timing credit

  15. Timing the govt bond market

  16. Timing cash

  17. DGF … the new balanced • Most of the research says that strategic asset allocation gives the biggest bang for one’s buck • In this work we are really looking at TAA • There have been a huge number of DGFs launched recently; there is SAA embedded in these funds • Some DGFs emphasise the TAA overlay as an added source of return

  18. Summary • These are just a small set of the preliminary results • But the basic finding is that: • Using returns-based data there is little evidence of TAA ability amongst these managers • Using asset class weights, there is much more evidence of TAA ability • However, in both cases it is still very difficult to distinguish this skill from luck • But as we know, sometimes it’s better to be lucky than good!

More Related