1 / 6

Automated Testing Tool

Automated Testing Tool. For POS applications. Mrs. Connie Driscoll Managing Director CDA, RHISCOM’s Representative connie@cdriscollassociates.com.

ganit
Download Presentation

Automated Testing Tool

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Automated Testing Tool For POS applications Mrs. Connie Driscoll Managing Director CDA, RHISCOM’s Representative connie@cdriscollassociates.com

  2. AUTOMATON, new technology, to "retail industry" service, fully automated testing tool capable of certifying a POS application based on a simple principle "having a known input to obtain the expected output". Safer, faster and unattended. Manually work of several weeks is now got automatically just in few hours with reliable results without requiring peripherals, stationery and other supplies. • Avoids overtime, no more investment in peripherals for testing, reducing significantly power consumption and required space, as well. • Multi-platform, multi-channel, non invasive. • The service is performed by a basic group that consists in 1 (one) operational analyst and 1 (one) robot AUTOMATON. • A new technology aimed to give support not only to the QA Area, but also to programming departments and to operational area.

  3. Actual customer results • Manual Testing Process Conditions: • QA Head count…………................8 - Test cases, number……………………...1,600 • Testers……………………………...5 - Number of cycle per year…………………….4 • POS QA laboratories…………..…5 - Time per cycle…………………………………3 weeks • Go to market, revision no tested - No track record of defects • Data on excel, hard copies • Automate Testing Process Conditions • QA Head count………….................3 - Test cases number…………………..….1,780 • Testers……………………………...1 - Number of cycle per year……………..……. n • POS QA laboratories……………..1 - Time per cycle…………………………….…24 hrs. • Tested revisions, “go to market” …1 day - Test cases and track records on data base • AUTOMATON…………...……..1 C U S T O M E R 1 Note: All former testers were moved to production/programming

  4. Actual customer results • Manual Testing Process Conditions: • POS QA Head count……............10 - Test cases, number…………………….....800 • Testers………………………………4 - Number of cycle per year…………………… 2 • POS QA laboratories…………..….2 - Time per cycle………………………………1 Night • Go to market, revision no tested - For testing they move 150 people to a large store • Data on excel, hard copies - No track record of defects • Automate Testing Process Conditions • QA Head count………….................3 - Test cases number……………………….960 • Testers……………………………...1 - Number of cycle per year…………….……. n • POS QA laboratories…………..…1 - Time per cycle…………………….…………8 hrs. • Tested revisions, “go to market” ..6 hrs - Test cases and track record on data base • AUTOMATON…………...…………2 units (QA and programming) C U S T O M E R 2 Note: All former testers were moved to production/programming

  5. Automation process is 95% shorter than the manual one • AUTOMATON is 14 times faster on execution • Also in mistakes/failures detection and effectiveness. • It produces 76% savings on headcount QA payroll amounts. • At least, 83% savings on peripherals and stationery.

  6. Timing implementation Pilot 6 weeks Start up 14 weeks Service by annual contract Thank you! Please contact us rhiscom.com / cda.com

More Related