1 / 14

International Shipping and Climate Change

International Shipping and Climate Change. Michael Sutton A/g Executive Director Infrastructure and Surface Transport Policy. Outline. UNFCCC framework, role of ICAO and IMO Emissions from fuel used for international transport  International shipping and reduction measures

gaye
Download Presentation

International Shipping and Climate Change

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International Shipping and Climate Change Michael Sutton A/g Executive Director Infrastructure and Surface Transport Policy

  2. Outline • UNFCCC framework, role of ICAO and IMO • Emissions from fuel used for international transport  • International shipping and reduction measures • IMO work on GHG policy framework

  3. 52.9% Maritime 42.5% Aviation Source: International Energy Agency International transport emissions

  4. International process • National targets under UNFCCC • Address International bunkers through ICAO and IMO • Post Kyoto congruent process towards end 2009 agreement • CO2 principal greenhouse gas in relation to transport

  5. Estimates of global shipping emissions

  6. Shipping sector • World GDP grew by 4.0% while volume of world trade grew by 8.0% • 60,000 ships in world trade as at January 2007 • Estimated to grow by11% by 2020 • Big ships to grow by around 60% over the period • Estimated fuel consumption nearly 500 million tons in 2020, a one quarter increase in fuel consumption from 2007 figures.

  7. Reduction measures Three broad categories • Technical: fuel efficiency measures or alternate fuel and energy source • Operational: ship/port operational changes for improved efficiency and fuel savings • Market based: economic instrument to encourage behavioural change

  8. Technical measures • Short term energy savings achievable through application of current technologies • Potential of technical measures to reduce CO2 emissions estimated as 5-30% in new ships and 4-20% in existing ships • HFO quality poor and approaching acceptable critical specification both environmentally and for engine performance

  9. Operational measures • Potential of operational measures estimated as 1-40% • Speed selection alone results in highest reduction of CO2 • 25% reduction in turn around time reduces CO2 by 1-4% • Reduction in turn around time with speed selection can reduce CO2 by 14-17%

  10. Market based measures • Can drive technical and operational changes • Ship emissions outside national control • Policy instrument needs to be comprehensive and global in scope

  11. IMO 2009 GHG study • Update to GHG 2000 study to inform IMO deliberations on a global agreement by end 2009 • Phase I to inform on current inventories, future scenarios and climate impact from CO2 emissions • MEPC 58 in October to discuss Phase I of the report • Phase 2 to fully inform on current inventories, future scenarios, climate impact and reduction potential

  12. GHG: IMO fundamental principles • Effective in contributing to reduction of total global GHG emissions • Binding and equally applicable to all flag states • Cost effective • Able to limit or effectively minimise competitive distortion • Should not penalise global trade and growth • Goal based approach and not prescribe specific methods • Support technical innovation and R&D in shipping • Accommodate leading technologies in energy efficiency • Practical, transparent, fraud free and easy to administer

  13. IMO timeline • Keep one step ahead of the UNFCCC process

  14. Conclusion • No easy answers • Establish baseline, allocate emissions, design CO2 ship index, develop technical and operational best practices and formulate market based policy instrument • Global solution • Simple, practical and effective • Does not penalise global trade and growth in shipping industry

More Related