1 / 25

Value and Future of Library E-Resources 

Value and Future of Library E-Resources . Dr. Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee ctenopir@utk.edu. VALA Melbourne, Australia February 2010. Value of libraries can be measured in many ways:. Use (i.e., downloads) Explicit value (i.e., Interviews) Derived values (i.e., ROI).

glynn
Download Presentation

Value and Future of Library E-Resources 

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Value and Future of Library E-Resources  Dr. Carol TenopirUniversity of Tennesseectenopir@utk.edu VALA Melbourne, Australia February 2010

  2. Value of libraries can be measured in many ways: • Use (i.e., downloads) • Explicit value (i.e., Interviews) • Derived values (i.e., ROI)

  3. Usage is an implied value

  4. Going beyond implied value to show… • Purpose • Outcomes • Return on Investment (ROI)

  5. Three phases • Phase 1: ROI in grants, case study at University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (completed 2008) http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/whitepapers/0108/lcwp010801.html • Phase 2: ROI in grants, expanded to 8 countries (report coming soon) • Phase 3: Value and ROI for grants/research, teaching, student engagement (2010-2012)

  6. Phases 1 and 2:Faculty Grant Research Cycle ConductResearch WriteArticles LIBRARY WriteReports &Proposals ObtainGrants

  7. Return on Investment (ROI) ROI is a quantitative measure expressed as a ratio of the value returned to the institution for each monetary unit invested in the library. For every $/€/£ spent on the library,the university received ‘X’ $/€/£ in return. Demonstrate that library collections contribute to income-generating activities

  8. ROI Model for University of Illinois (Phase 1) $4.38 grant income for each $1.00 invested in library 78.14% faculty with proposals using citations from library X 50.79% of these were awarded X $63,923 avg. grant income = $25,369 avg. grant income generated using citations from library X 6232 grants expended ÷$36,102,613 library budget

  9. Phase 2: Grants only8 institutions in 8 countries

  10. Phase 2: ROI Findings Research and Teaching • Under 1:1 Research and Teaching STM/Hum/SS • 1.3:1 to 3.4:1

  11. Phase 2: Why Does ROI for Grants Vary? ROI depends on institutional mission Research institutes have high grants ROI Teaching universities have lower grants ROI ROI varies depending on methods of government funding Be cautious comparing ROI across institutions

  12. ROI Value and Beyond: Faculty Survey Questions • Importance and number of citations? • What % of citations from the library e-collection? • For each cited, how many others do you read? • In a typical week, how many hours do you spend, finding, reading articles? • How has access to e-resources through the library changed your work?

  13. Value of E-Resources (Faculty comments) “Access has made collecting research resources infinitely more efficient; and facilitated interdisciplinary research.” North American University “…Such access has become an essential research tool.” Asian University

  14. Impact on Productivity (Faculty comments) “I guess that on average the online access saves me more than 10 hours per week.” Western European Research Institute “The convenience of desktop delivery has improved my efficiency and dare I say it my ability to be a better researcher and teacher.” Asian University

  15. Survey Findings by Grants ROI levels:High; Medium; Low • 15-30 hours per week finding, accessing, and reading scholarly literature (19 and17-20) • 75% of citations came from library electronic journals (75% and 50%) • 95% considered references are essential (94-96% and 93-94%) • 18-31 books or articles in each proposal submitted (13-34and 7-24) • For every article cited, 27-40 are read (18-19and 24-25)

  16. Administration Values: Measuring Up • 1) Attract outstanding faculty • Faculty with more publications and citations obtain more grants.* • Faculty who publish more read more • Faculty who receive awards read more • 2) Retain outstanding faculty • - “I would leave this university in a microsecond if the library deteriorated” - U.S. University • *Ali & Bhattacharyya, “Research Grant and Faculty Productivity Nexus: Heterogeneity among Dissimilar Institutions.” Academic Analytics

  17. Administration Values: Measuring Up (cont) • 3) Foster innovative research • - “I am now able to explore and trace back topics and check the developments that arose along the topic history making connections that were only dreams a few years ago.” -Western European Research Institute • Build research reputation of institution • In 1 university, over 10 years a 1% increase in library budget correlates with a 1.07% increase in grant funding • In another, over 10 years a 1% increase in library budget correlates with a 1.21% increase in grant funding

  18. Administration Values: Measuring Up (3) 5) Promote seamless integration of the library with institutional research activities - “With the current workload, I could not continue with research without the convenience of access from my own computer” – South African University - A doubling in article downloads, from 1 to 2 million, is statistically associated with dramatic increases in research productivity** **Research Information Network. 2009. E-journals: their use, value and impact. Report prepared by Research Information Network.

  19. LibValue (Phase 3): Broaden focus

  20. And anticipate change..New Scholarly Endeavors That Cut Across the Library’s Functional Areas Teaching / Learning Research Social / Professional e-science Collaborative Scholarship Scholarly Endeavors Institutional Repositories Functional Areas

  21. Downstream Measures by Library Functional Area (for students and faculty)

  22. What we can show so far… • Academic library collections help faculty be productive and successful • Libraries help generate grants income • E-collections are valued by faculty no matter where in the world • ROI for grants varies by mission and location of institution • Value can be measured in many ways

  23. What we hope to show… The library’s products and services … • Help faculty be successful • Help students be successful • Generate both immediate and downstream income • Provide value and return on investment

  24. Some Final Thoughts on Measuring Value Tie what you measure to the mission of the university Measure outcomes, not inputs Quantitative data can show ROI and trends Qualitative data tell a story No one method stands alone

  25. Tenopir, C. 2009. University Investment in the Library, Phase II: An International Study of the Library’s Value to the Grants Process. Report prepared for Elsevier LibraryConnect.For further information: ctenopir@utk.edu

More Related