1 / 10

New Approach to World Bank Urban Projects In India: Performance Driven-Incentive Based

Strengthening Urban Management: India Administrative Staff College of India – Hyderabad January 20-24, 2003. New Approach to World Bank Urban Projects In India: Performance Driven-Incentive Based The World Bank’s overarching goal is poverty reduction Richard M. Beardmore

hagop
Download Presentation

New Approach to World Bank Urban Projects In India: Performance Driven-Incentive Based

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strengthening Urban Management: IndiaAdministrative Staff College of India – Hyderabad January 20-24, 2003 New Approach to World Bank Urban Projects In India: Performance Driven-Incentive Based The World Bank’s overarching goal is poverty reduction Richard M. Beardmore Senior Urban Specialist World Bank

  2. Assumptions • Economic growth in India is increasingly dependent on towns and cities • More growth requires better functioning cities • India’s urban poverty, while generally on the decline, is still significant: 80 million people • Appropriate urban development is one avenue for urban poverty reduction • The urban poor require empowerment, security, and opportunities in order to improve their quality of life

  3. What are India’s current urban problems? • Inadequate urban services • Weak urban governance and management • Lack of conducive infrastructure finance systems • Wrong incentives created by current system of devolution of funds • Ineffective land management

  4. How can Bank help address problems? • Work with reform-minded States • Work at State and Local level at the same time • At State level, assist with policy reform • At local level, link access to Bank resources to achievement of implementation of policy reforms • Target investments largely at low-income communities

  5. What kind of typical State-level activities required? • Legislative reform: repeal of ULCA, reform RCA, rationalize stamp duties • Financial management: establish ULB borrowing framework • Benchmarking system : municipal performance measurement • Streamline land management system • Establish cadre of urban managers

  6. What kind of typical local level activities required? • Human resource development • Property tax reform • Expand computerized registration processes throughout all ULBs • Develop citizen charters to increase accountability to local population • Strengthen capacity of community groups to play role in selection/management of services • Invest in priority infrastructure services

  7. What kinds of infrastructure services? • Area upgrading, incl water supply and sanitation • Access: roads, foot paths, bus stops • Storm water drainage • Solid waste management • Street lighting • Serviced areas for markets • Parks and green spaces • Off-site links to city wide network services

  8. What criteria to be used to determine who gets the funds? Tentatively….. • Measure of severity of poverty within jurisdiction • Benchmarked level of property tax collection • Operating ratio less than 1 • Debt service less than 30% • others

  9. What’s the Process? • State and local level reforms introduced, giving priority to URIF reforms • Consultative planning process for priority services at community level proceeds in parallel • ULBs identify further administrative reforms and critical city-wide infrastructure • All ULB proposals put in form of action plan for review by State agencies • Approved items are funded for eligible ULBs

  10. What’s in it for whom? • Need for financial support to local level from State reduced • ULBs gain financial strength, increased creditworthiness, more autonomy as a result of policy reform • Urban poor receive benefit of investments at community level and greater role in urban decision making

More Related