1 / 9

Distribution Integrity Management Plan Ed Dreesman Dan Miller

Distribution Integrity Management Plan Ed Dreesman Dan Miller. Statistics. DIMP Plan Index. D 1.10 History of Plan D 1.20 Statement of Management Support D 1.30 Documents Incorporated by Reference D 1.40 Code Cross Reference D 1.50 Definitions D 1.60 Abbreviations

hakeem-sampson
Download Presentation

Distribution Integrity Management Plan Ed Dreesman Dan Miller

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Distribution Integrity Management PlanEd DreesmanDan Miller

  2. Statistics

  3. DIMP Plan Index • D 1.10 History of Plan • D 1.20 Statement of Management Support • D 1.30 Documents Incorporated by Reference • D 1.40 Code Cross Reference • D 1.50 Definitions • D 1.60 Abbreviations • D 10.0 Plan Maintenance and Change Management • D 10.10 Roles and Responsibilities • D 10.20 Plan Maintenance • D 10.30 Plan Reviews • D 10.40 Change Management • D 10.50 Variance Procedure • D 10.60 Change Approval Documentation • D 10.70 Records Documentation and Retention • D 20.0 Personnel Training and Qualifications • D 20.10 Purpose • D 20.20 Scope • D 20.30 Responsibilities and Qualifications • D 20.40 Training • D 20.50 Documentation • D 30.0 Quality Control and Assurance • D 30.10 Quality Control • D 30.20 Quality Assurance • D 30.30 Corrective Actions • D 40.0 IT Plan • D 40.10 System Requirements • D 40.20 Applications & Data • D 40.30 MRP Modeling • D 50.0 Communications Plan • D 50.10 Plan Maintenance • D 50.20 Plan Funding • D 50.30 Communications Approval • D 50.40 Communications Process • D 60.0 Risk Plan • D 60.10 Knowledge • D 60.20 Identify Threats • D 60.30 Evaluate and Rank Risk • D 60.40 Identify and Implement Measures to Address Risk • D 60.50 Measure Performance, Monitor Results, and Evaluate Effectiveness • D 60.60 Periodic Evaluation and Improvement • D 60.70 Report Results • D 70.0 Special Procedure • D 80.0 Forms and Record Retention • D 90.0 Index (Subject Cross-reference)

  4. Organizational Structure

  5. Status • Purchased and installed software - 2009 • Subject matter expert review of risk factors & process - 2009 • Establish active third-party damage team - 2009 • First draft of plan – June 1, 2010 • Complete management review – October 1, 2010 • Regulatory review – unknown • Start implementation – August 2, 2011

  6. Overall Process • Software to develop risk score • Subject matter expert confirm software analysis • Develop plan to improve score • Budget to fund plan • Implement plan • Document process • Review results • Repeat process annually until process is refined

  7. How will DIMP change the way MidAmerican performs operations and maintenance work? • Increased documentation • Increased data collection • Increased accuracy of records • Increased automation of recordkeeping and analysis • Centralized planning for replacement or other remediation • More consistent procedures and policy • More communications

  8. What issue does MidAmerican expect to receive the greatest focus as your company prepares the plan? • Third-party damage • Resources to execute plan • Calibrating model to subject matter expert experience • Communications/training • Data clean-up

  9. From an implementation perspective, what are the parts of the regulation that you feel will be the most challenging to operators? • Third-party damage • Resources to execute plan • Calibrating model to subject matter expert experience • Communications/training • Data clean-up • Performance language left to interpretation of operator and regulator • Keeping up with the rule changes and interpretations • Other new rules

More Related