1 / 7

GMEOC Internal Review

GMEOC Internal Review. Refresher for Review Participants on Process & Roles August 19, 2009. Goals of Revised Process . Ease burden on primary reviewer Spread workload across four roles Ensure appropriate accountability Effectively prepare program for site visit

hasad-mckee
Download Presentation

GMEOC Internal Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GMEOC Internal Review Refresher for Review Participants on Process & Roles August 19, 2009

  2. Goals of Revised Process • Ease burden on primary reviewer • Spread workload across four roles • Ensure appropriate accountability • Effectively prepare program for site visit • New templates, interview scripts • Ensure effective documentation for ACGME • Fewer citations

  3. Four roles • Primary Reviewer (Program Director) • Secondary Reviewer (Program Director or Education Manager) • Administrative Reviewer (GME or Coordinator) • Resident Reviewer Primary Reviewer determines how team will communicate between team members to complete report

  4. Process • Programs must be visited within 2 months of its mid-cycle from last date of accreditation • Dr. Getto’s office sends notification of Internal Review Visit w/2-3 optional dates selected by the Review Team to the Director whose Program is being reviewed • 2-3 hour mandatory meeting is scheduled 5-6 months out and all team members notified • Program being reviewed submits to GME Office: • Common & Specialty/Subspecialty PIF • Other required Program Documentation • Competency Chart • All reviewers receive materials 2-3 months in advance of GMEOC deadline for report

  5. ACGME-Required Interviews • Meeting w/Director & Coordinator (90 minutes) • Faculty may be included in this meeting • Meeting w/Residents (90 minutes) • Number varies but must be representative of program • May be led by Resident Reviewer • Meeting w/at least one Faculty is essential • May be held at meeting w/Director or at a Section meeting • Faculty member must be interviewed no minimum standard • All four Reviewers should be included in all meetings when possible • Meeting w/Coordinator to review documentation (90 minutes) • Audit of Program Policies • Review of Resident/Fellow Portfolios

  6. Tips on Successful Process • Effective communication among team members critical to complete report • Minimize confusion over who has which portion of the Checklist • Submit to Primary Reviewer for collation • Cross-check of data between reviewers • Draft report and template sent by Primary Reviewer to Program Director for review • Correct inaccuracies • Program gives courtesy feedback only— otherwise may experience “review creep” • Final report and template sent to GME Office 2 weeks before GMEOC meeting • Won’t get on agenda if otherwise • Timeliness ensures UWHC meets ACGME required timeframe

  7. Questions? • Feel free to ask for assistance • Program Documentation—Jeanne Sarbacker 262-8399 • Program Requirements or Review Process—Anne Gravel Sullivan 262-5512

More Related