Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management

1. CNI Spring Meeting * St. Louis * 9 April 2019 Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management Findings from a Global Survey • Rebecca BryantSenior Program Officer, OCLC Research • Jan FransenService Lead for Research Information Management Systems, University of Minnesota bryantr@oclc.org @RebeccaBryant18 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3381 fransen@umn.edu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0302-2761

2. Some (not so) Random Examples

3. University of Illinois How much are we spending for Open Access? From The Shadow Acquisitions Budget: APCs and Open Access Publications at a Research University William H. Mischo & Thomas H. Teper (UIUC) – CNI Meeting, December 2018 https://youtu.be/mqm7siVBGs4

4. University of Arizona How can we unlock all the data in faculty CVs? From Research Information Management: Libraries Leading the Way Bryant, Fransen, Oxnam, and Rauh – ACRL 2019, Later this week!

5. University of Minnesota How can we show the impact of equipment and facilities? From University of Minnesota Libraries: RIM Use Cases website https://z.umn.edu/RIMUseCases

6. State of Ohio How can we connect Ohio businesses with university expertise? From Ohio Innovation Exchange https://www.ohioinnovationexchange.org/

7. University of St Andrews How can we prepare for REF 2021*? *REF 2021 is the Research Excellence Framework. See https://www.ref.ac.uk/ for more information. From University of St Andrews Library website https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/library/services/researchsupport/openaccess/

8. What do these examples have in common?

9. RIM Systems… are used to collect the scholarly output of an institution.And allow it to be combined with other information collected on campus. oc.lc/rim “RIM Metadata” by OCLC Research, from Research Information Management: Defining RIM and the Library’s Role (doi.org/10.25333/C3NK88),CC BY 4.0

10. RIM Systems… are used to collect the scholarly output of an institution.And allow it to be combined with other information collected on campus. oc.lc/rim “RIM Metadata” by OCLC Research, from Research Information Management: Defining RIM and the Library’s Role (doi.org/10.25333/C3NK88),CC BY 4.0

11. Is this a trend? Learning more…

12. Devoted to challenges facing libraries and archives since 1978 • Community resource for shared Research and Development (R&D) • Engagement with OCLC members and the community around shared concerns • Learn more • oc.lc/research • Hangingtogether.org blog

13. OCLC Research publications on Research Information Management oc.lc/rim

14. RIM = The aggregation, curation, & utilization of metadata about research activities

15. Overlapping terms: • CRIS (Current Research Information System) • RIS (Research Information System) • RNS (Research Networking System) • RPS (Research Profiling System) • EFS (Expert Finder System) • FAR (Faculty Activity Reporting) RIM = The aggregation, curation, & utilization of metadata about research activities

16. Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey Rebecca Bryant, PI, OCLC Research Pablo de Castro, Strathclyde University and euroCRIS Anna Clements, University of St. Andrews and euroCRIS Annette Dortmund, OCLC EMEA Jan Fransen, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Michele Mennielli, DuraSpace and euroCRIS Plus a number of valuable collaborators at OCLC oc.lc/rim

17. Incentives for RIM Adoption • Functions/Uses of RIM • Interoperability • RIM Stakeholders • Use of Persistent Identifiers Results we’ll be talking about

18. Online survey data collection: Oct 2017 – Jan 2018 • English and Spanish versions • Survey promotion through: • OCLC and euroCRIS communications channels and events worldwide • Communications by RIM vendors and user communities • Listservs, social media, and announcements to research & library organizations Methodology and Promotion

19. RIM Survey responses: geographic overview381 survey respondents from 44 countries “Total number of survey respondents, by broad region” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

20. Research Information Management Systems Well over half (58%) have a live RIM System Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

21. Managing annual academic activity reporting • Supporting expertise discovery • Supporting institutional compliance (e.g., funder mandates, national assessment exercise like REF or ERA, etc.) • Supporting institutional reputation and strategic decision making • Improving services for researchers • Recording institutional research facilities and their use “Please indicate the importance of the following reasons for pursuing RIM activities”

22. Reporting and compliance drive RIM adoption Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

24. Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

26. Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

27. US is an outlier • No national compliance requirements • Early emphasis on Research Networking Systems (e.g., Harvard Profiles) • Action for the next survey • Different platforms emphasize different capabilities, so… • Increase promotion to Profiles RNS and VIVO communities • Research Question for the next survey • Will incentives for new adopters of RIM shift away from compliance and toward expertise discovery? • Most institutions with reporting mandates will have already implemented RIM Summary:Reasons for adoption

28. Registry of institutional research output • Publicly available researcher profiles • Reporting scholarly impact • Reporting societal impact • External (e.g., National) research assessment • Internal reporting • Annual academic activity reporting workflows • Awards/grants management workflows • Compliance and open access to publications • Reuse (in CVs, biosketches, other web pages) • Identifying collaborators or expertise “How important are the following functions of RIM at your institution?”

29. Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

30. Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

31. Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

32. Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

33. Use of RIM Systems to support repository functions

34. “Institutions with a live RIM system reporting that their RIM system serves as their default institutional repository/ETD repository/research data repository, with regional subdivisions” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

35. RIM has multiple uses at most institutions • External & internal assessment are among the most important (and unsurprising) • Managing OA compliance is also important • Supporting the discovery of potential research collaborators is less important Summary:RIM Uses

36. Stakeholders

37. “Primary stakeholders based on total number of mentions across all responses for all areas of activity, in aggregate. Note that multiple primary stakeholders could be selected per area of activity” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

38. Stakeholders with Primary Responsibility for RIM Activities by Country Based on # of Mentions (Decreasing Importance of Library) Base: Institution with a Live RIM system Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

39. Persistent Identifiers

40. Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

41. Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

42. Congruent with our qualitative Convenience and Compliance* findings • Strong adoption of person identifiers • ORCID becoming a de facto standard in scholarly literature, but other identifiers also needed and used • Organizational identifiers largely unused. . . for now Summary:Persistent Identifiers *Bryant, Rebecca, Annette Dortmund, and Constance Malpas. 2017. Convenience and Compliance: Case Studies on Persistent Identifiers in European Research Information. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. doi:10.25333/C32K7M

43. Bryant, Rebecca, Anna Clements, Carol Feltes, David Groenewegen, Simon Huggard, Holly Mercer, Roxanne Missingham, MaliacaOxnam, Anne Rauh and John Wright. 2017. Research Information Management: Defining RIM and the Library’s Role. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. doi:10.25333/C3NK88 Bryant, Rebecca, Annette Dortmund, and Constance Malpas. 2017. Convenience and Compliance: Case Studies on Persistent Identifiers in European Research Information. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. doi:10.25333/C32K7M Bryant, Rebecca, Anna Clements, Pablo de Castro, Joanne Cantrell, Annette Dortmund, Jan Fransen, Peggy Gallagher, and Michele Mennielli. 2018. Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research.  https://doi.org/10.25333/BGFG-D241 Ribeiro, Lígia, Pablo De Castro, and Michele Mennielli. “EUNIS-EuroCRIS Joint Survey on CRIS and IR,” 2016. http://www.eurocris.org/news/cris-ir-survey-report. References

44. Discussion Rebecca Bryant, PhD, Senior Program Officer, OCLC Research bryantr@oclc.org@RebeccaBryant18 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3881 Jan Fransen, Service Lead for RIM Systems, University of Minnesota fransen@umn.edu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0302-2761 oc.lc/rim