1 / 18

Evidence Based Practice: Unit II Asking and Answering Clinical Questions: Intervention

Evidence Based Practice: Unit II Asking and Answering Clinical Questions: Intervention. Mount St. Mary’s College Doctor of Physical Therapy Program Faculty Online Instruction. Asking Clinical Questions. Objectives: Understand the difference between background and foreground questions.

Download Presentation

Evidence Based Practice: Unit II Asking and Answering Clinical Questions: Intervention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evidence Based Practice: Unit II Asking and Answering Clinical Questions: Intervention Mount St. Mary’s College Doctor of Physical Therapy Program Faculty Online Instruction

  2. Asking Clinical Questions Objectives: • Understand the difference between background and foreground questions. • Understand the need for background and foreground questions in physical therapy education. • Given a patient scenario write an answerable question related to diagnosis, prognosis, intervention and outcomes using the PICO method.

  3. . • Domain V • Evaluate Use of evidence • Assess EBP skills and use of evidence. • Share and store critical appraisals • Monitor literature for new evidence Identify Learning or Developmental Need . • Domain I • Ask Focused Questions • Identify category of evidence (Diagnosis, Prognosis, Intervention) • Formulate four-part clinical question Client/Patient Problem EBP begins and ends here! Domain IV Apply Findings Interpret evidence in the context of the specific issues related to the client/patient problem. • Domain II • Search for Evidence • Use evidence hierarchy to guide search: • Search for meta-analyses, systematic reviews first. • Search primary literature • Domain III • Critically Appraise Evidence • What is the level of evidence? • Is the evidence valid? • Are the results important? Modified by Slavin, 2005

  4. Client/Patient ProblemEBP begins and ends here! • A patient problem that cannot be answered with existing knowledge. • A challenge to one’s own existing knowledge– does literature support our best judgment??

  5. Identify Learning or Developmental Need • Diagnosis • Prognosis • Therapy (Intervention)

  6. Evidence in Practice • Is there evidence that performing joint manipulation under local anesthetic block might be more effective than continuing a program of joint mobilization, stretching, and mobility exercises in a woman with recalcitrant adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder? • Whitman, Fritz, Boyles. Physical Therapy . Volume 83 . 2003. pp 486-496.

  7. Domain IAsk Focused Questions • Intervention • Formulate a focused clinical question • P atient • I ntervention • C omparison groups • O utcomes

  8. Domain IISearch for Evidence • Use evidence hierarchy to guide search: • Search for meta-analyses, systematic reviews first. • Search primary literature • PubMed’s Clinical Queries & Cochrane Library are useful tools.

  9. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Randomized Controlled Trials Cohort Studies Case Control Studies Opinions, Letters Animal Research In vitro Research

  10. Domain IIICritically Appraise Evidence • What is the level of evidence? • Is the evidence valid? • Are the results important?

  11. Number Needed to Treat (NNT) • How do we make decisions based on p values? • How do we REALLY know which treatment wins?

  12. NNT 1 NNT = Pi - Pc TiTc

  13. McKenzie vs. Mobilization Schenk et al., J of Man & Manip Ther. 11:95-102, 2003

  14. Therapy • Was the assignment of patients to treatment randomized? Was the randomization list concealed? • Was follow-up of patients sufficiently long and complete? • Were all patients analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized?

  15. Therapy • Were patients and clinicians kept blind to treatment? • Were groups treated equally, apart from the experimental therapy? • Were the groups similar at the start of the trial?

  16. Domain IVApply Findings Interpret evidence in the context of the specific issues related to the client/patient problem.

  17. Domain VEvaluate Use of evidence • Assess EBP skills and use of evidence. • Share and store critical appraisals (CATs) • Monitor literature for new evidence

More Related